Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Something like this is fine if you have access to a workshop full of tools and plenty of spare parts laying about,not to mention some major fabrication and mechanical skills needed to build something like that and make it reliable.

How reliable is it?

A worked V8 built with off the shelf parts would net you more usable torque/power and reliablitity without the need for custom bits.

Of course some prefer just to be different for differents sake.. :thumbsup:

Something like this is fine if you have access to a workshop full of tools and plenty of spare parts laying about,not to mention some major fabrication and mechanical skills needed to build something like that and make it reliable.

How reliable is it?

A worked V8 built with off the shelf parts would net you more usable torque/power and reliablitity without the need for custom bits.

Of course some prefer just to be different for differents sake.. :thumbsup:

its actually very simple to rig up if you can weld. Just a y pipe from charger and turbo (one way plumber valve on charger side so boost does not push back on charger)

its actually very simple to rig up if you can weld. Just a y pipe from charger and turbo (one way plumber valve on charger side so boost does not push back on charger)

But isnt the boost feeding through the charger?

with a vortex style charger I see how that would work but the one in the picture is a roots style which would require the feed to go through it..

The intake manifold would be the easy bit but then theres pulleys custom manifolds all sorts of mounts and linkages..Even in your workshop this would take a solid week at least, in the average humble garage we are talking months of work for no great result..

Edited by Arthur T3

But isnt the boost feeding through the charger?

with a vortex style charger I see how that would work but the one in the picture is a roots style which would require the feed to go through it..

The intake manifold would be the easy bit but then theres pulleys custom manifolds all sorts of mounts and linkages..Even in your workshop this would take a solid week at least, in the average humble garage we are talking months of work for no great result..

ijm talking the rb i spoke about earlier, that v8 with the roots will be more like 800rwkw and yes flow goes exhaust-turbo-FMIC-charger-intake mounted cooler-intake- engine.

Trent, motor in the pic looks monstrous :)

Just like to mention Josh that we have identical motors and with a good choice of turbo you can still get close to 10psi @ 2000rpm with good top end...

I dont have my last dyno sheet in soft copy at the moment, can upload tomorrow if your keen, but with a gt3076r with a .63 bum I have 9psi @ 2400rpm and 18psi @ 3000rpm in 4th. For added response, the turbo is assisted with a gizzmo boost controller and exhaust cam gear, thats it, on a standard manifold.

gl if you want to really try, but i would look at the new gtx3071 for even better response and all that for alot less headache :)

  • Like 1

I wonder how that guy deals with compressor surge on the big turbo. If the small turbo makes 20psi down really low, there's no way the big turbo could not surge at 20psi when it's not even spooled up yet. Very impressive!

Edit: I paused the vid and answered my own question lol. The big turbo is before the small turbo on the inlet side.

I wonder what the shaft speed on the smaller turbo would be with all the airflow from the bigger turbo going through it.

Edited by bradsm87
  • Like 1

Trent, motor in the pic looks monstrous :)

Just like to mention Josh that we have identical motors and with a good choice of turbo you can still get close to 10psi @ 2000rpm with good top end...

I dont have my last dyno sheet in soft copy at the moment, can upload tomorrow if your keen, but with a gt3076r with a .63 bum I have 9psi @ 2400rpm and 18psi @ 3000rpm in 4th. For added response, the turbo is assisted with a gizzmo boost controller and exhaust cam gear, thats it, on a standard manifold.

gl if you want to really try, but i would look at the new gtx3071 for even better response and all that for alot less headache :)

Good to see gear from some people with a positive attitude! And Trent that motor does look epic! Adam, been reading through your progress in the DE+T thread and must say i'm duly impressed with your work! thumbsup.gif

This isn't so much of a should-I-do-it thing, just been browsing/searching and looking at different set-ups people have tried, and figuring that everyone wants boost from idle through redline (from a performance POV), could this be a happy medium? As Trent said, the setup he mentioned cost $1500 with the right knowledge and tools/equipment (obviously minus labour etc. etc.).

Most people are doing a DE+T for less than $1k, so surely the parts to complete this wouldn't exceed $2k, no, it's not going to make 11ty killerwasps, but to drive with such a mid-range punch? Maybe I'm thinking too much... rolleyes.gif

(And as i've said repeatedly, this is purely from a theoretical point-of-view using the aforementioned set-up as an example to express an idea.)

Something like this is fine if you have access to a workshop full of tools and plenty of spare parts laying about,not to mention some major fabrication and mechanical skills needed to build something like that and make it reliable.

How reliable is it?

A worked V8 built with off the shelf parts would net you more usable torque/power and reliablitity without the need for custom bits.

Of course some prefer just to be different for differents sake.. :thumbsup:

Check and check.. laugh.gif

its actually very simple to rig up if you can weld. Just a y pipe from charger and turbo (one way plumber valve on charger side so boost does not push back on charger)

I think this would be the major issue with a set-up like this, physically fitting two turbos to a car has been done (duh), but getting everything to work in the correct sequence, such as stopping the smaller item to allow the big one to take over, whilst not losing exhaust flow, and also keeping the smaller item going so it doesn't have to start again on a gear shift, and also preventing any kind of loss back through the system.

geta rb25det..

+10 for originality and value of input...

So much easier to build an RB30DET..

RB25 turbo on my 30DET spooled from idle (had to tighten the bov right up as it was pushing open at idle), made 12psi by 2200rpm and 183rwkw at ~4600rpm (compared to the same turbo on my old 20DET which made 12psi by 3500rpm and ~180rwkw about 6500rpm).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...