Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

TD06-25G is the big brother of the T67-25G

has the same comp cover and wheel with a bigger turbine

TD06-20G is smaller than a t67-25G by using the 20G comp wheel

then there is the TD06-20GL2 Which has the 20G comp and the same small turbine of the T67-25G

Hope you havent had too many beers when trying to work that out hahha

T67 is it what Simon has and no way will it fit low mount td06 is smaller

yeh I have a t67 on mine too, it goes like this in size from small to large:

td06l2-20g

td06(H,SH)-20g

t67-25g

td06-25g

Edited by battery

Well, my TD06-20G is not an L2. I had an L2 but gave it to a friend with my old manifold etc to try. There is an identical RB20 to mine running the same mani/gate and tuner - dyno but L2 and he made 0.5kw less then me on the same boost with almost the exact same response. Mine was actually a bit more responsive. So I dont think there is really a big difference between the TD06 and L2 version of the turbine. The L2 turbine is common with the T67. I am not sure about the TD06H, but i know my TD06-25G is actually a TD06SH-25G. Here are some pics of the TD06L2 vs the TD06SH

med_gallery_462_50_261066.jpg

med_gallery_462_50_26556.jpg

As you can see the TD06SH wheel is a lot bigger

If you need I can take some wheels of the T67-25G wheel on the weekend and also my TD06 wheel. My turbz are all Greddy/Trust jobbies but imagine they are all the same wheels, if not housings

Joel

Send your thanks to Roy

What is a little bigger than the td06sl2 20g and would fit low mount

The "non" L2 version might be able to flow a little more through the turbine, but as per Roys quote above there is SFA difference,

the issue with the T67 not fitting isnt the sheer size of them, but rather the much smaller turbine housing, a spacer plate could be made to suit, as the Comp cover is around GT3582 size, which does fit low mounted to a Rb25.

I would show you pics but some flamin mongrel stole my TD07 last year

isnt the problem that the stock manifold simply wont flow enough for a t67 to do its best...

Thats why i didnt bother with it..

Stao from hypergear said aftermarket manifolds reduced response and didn't increase power at all with his turbos around the 300kw mark.

maybe spend abit more and get a gt3076???

Thats what has to be weighed up, TD06 + ext gate and fabrication may cost more than an Internal gate GT3076 + dump

My case is different due to 1JZ needing a new manifold no matter what

isnt the problem that the stock manifold simply wont flow enough for a t67 to do its best...

Thats why i didnt bother with it..SL2 seemed like a better match..I can always hide a gate..

I tried to fit my t67 on the stock manifold just to see if it would fit but it was hitting engine mounts and A/C lines looked like alot of work and bordering on impossible.

Are you going to plumb the gate back into the exhaust?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
    • Hi guys . Can someone help me  I bought an Android screen for my Nissan fuga but it won't turn on   
    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
×
×
  • Create New...