Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think what Ash is trying to say is: 550rwhp is way to much grunt for the S14 chassis already and combine that with an inexpirenced drive on the track.

I tend to agree, you will be faster to begin with with 400rwhp or less and learn the finer points of going quick on a circuit.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's a fair point, and I appreciate the concern and suggestion for track purposes. Let's hope I'm a better driver than you're giving me credit for, considering I started out on karts at age 5. =D

*edit*

Talk to me a little bit about the factory redline on the RB25DET, what it can be safely increased to without modifications, and the steps required to increase it beyond that? Is increasing the redline required for more power on the engine or should I be seeing my max power more in the 6400 RPM range like the stock setup? I'm obviously seeing my max power at the redline currently, but I think that's because of the turbo compressor map not being ideal for the engine. I suppose the engine flows about 50 at 7500rpm?

Edited by radianation

Also, back to the possible issue of valve float, if you watch in this video, right about the time where the dip is in the power on my dyno chart you see a puff of black smoke from the exhaust. Any clue?

Black puff out the exhaust could be ping causing the carbon to be cleaned off the combustion chamber and coming out the exhaust :(

I am sure if the guy is fine with the car at 420whp, he's got the peddling to deal with a high power S14 and has an idea of what the chassis copes with a bit of power like.

For the higher power level you are after I'd have thought bigger cams etc would be a good idea too.

honestly i agree with the 3076 idea...

run e85 and you can see ~350rwkw with brilliant response

i run an HKS 2835 pro s and on e85 i see 323rwkw (432rwhp) with 20psi by 3400

the on/off throttle response is blistering for a 2.5 litre and a 3076 with a good manifold on sugarcubes should see you to ~470rwhp with similar response

ima post my dyno graph to show the difference between 98 and e85.

this is the same tuner, same car, same dyno, same day, different fuel:

med_gallery_36777_3194_124976.jpg

with the 3076 setup you'd end up with something similar to this response wise but with more power

I could always take that in steps. If the power isn't there on pump gas after the turbo swap I just change fuel... Or do you think I should change fuel now and see how the current turbo does?

I had a friend consult Garrett Marketing/Engineers directly and here is their suggestion / response:

So, we made some assumptions about the engine.

It is running an air-to-air intercooler.

4 valves/cylinder for .9 volumetric efficiency

It will be using pump gas (though I did try the match with a few different A/F ratios)

It will be used near Louisville with an average barometric pressure of 14.37 and an average temp of 55* F

Actual crank horsepower is approximately 675 accounting for a 20% drivetrain loss to give the 550 RWHP target

Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC) of 0.46

From what we can see, a 2.5L will have a difficult time making 675 HP at 20 psi without running really rich (I got it there at 9.2:1). However, a more sober 10.5:1 A/F ratio delivers the power at a pressure ratio of 2.8, or 25 psi gauge. This will give the target 675 crank HP at 7500 RPM. Intake manifold temps should hover around 129*, and torque should be 473 lb/ft.

Now, which turbo? Both of the choices Andrew listed would work. The GT3582R will make the power, but the bigger wheels are going to make it a little laggier. Plus, I don’t feel like the added volume is totally necessary given that it is a 2.5L and back pressure shouldn’t be an issue. My choice would be the GTX3076R, not only because it is the hawtness right now, but also because it will be faster reacting and will still deliver the power at ~73-75% efficiency. You’ll be closer to the choke flow line of the map, so the real power will be right smack dab in the heart of the map where you want it. Also, there are three A/R’s for turbine housing sizing. I’m feeling like the larger 1.06 might be the best way to go, but it is kind of guess and check with the turbine housing A/R sizing. The only caution I would have in using the GTX3076R is to watch for surge. I don’t think that it will happen, but there is a better chance of it occurring with this turbo than the GT3582R.

I think I'm going to go with the GTX3076R per the recommendations both on this forum and from the manufacturer. However, I'm not sure which A/R at this point.

Stop have a look at the airwerx series by borgwarner first

The s200sx is like the 3076 but the extended tip allows it to spool sooner.

Its also not ball bearing so you can rebuild it if you need to

Stop have a look at the airwerx series by borgwarner first

The s200sx is like the 3076 but the extended tip allows it to spool sooner.

Its also not ball bearing so you can rebuild it if you need to

If I wan gonna get a BW, It'd be the newer EFR series 4 sure.

Later they added this comment, which is more inline with what I was thinking...

Two small notes about the turbo, one change and one advise.

Rather than the 1.06 A/R, I’ve looked at back pressure numbers and a 0.82 A/R would be fine and get into boost between 500-1000 rpm sooner. A little back pressure isn’t necessarily a bad thing for track and autocross either.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
×
×
  • Create New...