Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Ppls,

Previously I thought the extra throttle body type device was a traction control thing which shut when wheelspin was evident.

I have since been told that this is actually a Variable Intake Flow thingo which acts to increase airflow speed at low rpm by closing like a normal throttle body, and then opening up at high rpm to give bulk airflow.

Now, PowerFCs are suppose to control all features of the engine management, and I would assume that this is a very important part of the Neo 6 engine.

To those who know, does the R-34 PowerFC allow you to control the activity of this throttle body device........??

I would assume that you could adjust this similar to the way you can with the NVCS.

Having said that though, it might have a link to TPS in order to give the best results depending on a lot of other variables......

Anybody with any experience??

Cheers

BASS OUT

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34851-r34-neo-straight-6-power-fc-question/
Share on other sites

Are you talking about the bit that sits across the inside of the plenum? it's open at low revs, then closes at high revs...speeds up the flow of air at high RPM. If you disconnect it you'll notice the car runs like a dog from about 3200-5000ish,then picks up in the last bit of the range.

Yep, that's the bit.

Any definent answers??

when I disconnected the plug to it last night, the Engine Warning light came and on the Slip/TCS off light lit up and I took it for a drive.

I didn't really notice a lot of difference but the car was cold and I couldn't really give it a good thrashing.

Guest RedLineGTR

The thing that is in front of the throttle body, is for the Traction Control System :D its what limits your revs when u are wheels spinning from the line, hence if you try to launch with the TCS on then you bog down quite bad. Hope it answers you question.

Guest RedLineGTR

The Power Fc will control everything the same as in other skylines (in one way or another) the Neo engine is tuned for more power (more R&D) over the past models. The TCS Has a Seperate ECU for what it does and u cant change any items of how it behaves with the power fc nor do i know any companys that have Tuned it in one way or another.

Guest RedLineGTR

I hope this is what u mean by your question. When the TCS is activated it is activated and if the car starts to slip highly then it kicks in just like i throttle body, like if you are on the pedal to the floor the TCS can ajust its throttle and limit your revs. If the system is off then the air flows how its meant to without any interuption.

My experience with the traction control is as follows.

Going around slight corners and nailing it, the car will pull lose power and then accelerate once grip is gained again.

But in the wet the car will drop spark and the engine will 'strobe' (for want of a better word) for a second and then accelerate, at which point traction will be lost again, and then it will strobe again.

I think maybe in moderate losses of traction, the blade might close, butin big ones it drops sparky and really pulles the reigns in.

If it only works for traction control, I wonder it there is any merit in using it as a variable intake diameter type device????

What makes you think it "drops sparky"? It just closes the valve completely starving the engine of air and probably cuts the fuel at the same time. If you cut spark it would backfire when you gave it back.

At it's most basic it just cuts power so you can get traction back and if you keep your foot down then it will spin the wheels again, thus restarting the whole process.

Abo Bob.

The sound it makes it identical to the sound that my car makes when misfiring on plugs that haven't been gapped properly.

That's why i made the assumption.

But I have been wrong before!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...