Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Because a car racing game where the developer release a way to start races when you're not there must be jam packed with racing excitement.

never had this issue...why sign up for a race, if your not gonna be there?? and i love the way you can get a group of friends together and everyone can just screw around on the track while waiting for the others to show up (people are always late)

i think its called anticipation, hence why the thread was started. im pretty sure the initial release was always gonna be around this time anyways (thats what i heard from day one of the PS being released) and it was always said it wasnt going to be released till crazy eccentric Japanese developer guy was happy with it. people just got impatient and started complaining..

and there were what 3 forza's in that time?? quantity over quality, the xbox way :cheers:

ahahaha what do you mean?

given that GT5 was GT4 with a new set of shoes on (seriously most of the cars looked like straight ports), I fail to see WHERE these extra years of development went. I was expecting something mindblowing, I got GT4 with cars that refuse to turn, with graphics on par with Forza 2.

never had this issue...why sign up for a race, if your not gonna be there?? and i love the way you can get a group of friends together and everyone can just screw around on the track while waiting for the others to show up (people are always late)

i think its called anticipation, hence why the thread was started. im pretty sure the initial release was always gonna be around this time anyways (thats what i heard from day one of the PS being released) and it was always said it wasnt going to be released till crazy eccentric Japanese developer guy was happy with it. people just got impatient and started complaining..

and there were what 3 forza's in that time?? quantity over quality, the xbox way :cheers:

Delusional.

Forza 2005, Forza 2 2007, Forza 3 2009. Two years is quantity over quality? I think that's just being able to finish a project.

Some of the BS I have seen people spout about Forza 3 it's just mind dumbing, either they have such a huge hardon for GT5 it gets in the way of them playing Forza 3 or they've just never played it.

Edited by DivHunter

In an interview with some game reviewer company. One GT5 developer said that GT5 was pushed back due to other projects (eg. GT 5 Prologue & PSP GT5).. So i don't think it was all about making this awesome game.. That was prob alot of rumour due to how long it was taking and alot of PS3 users bought the console mainly for GT5

And what do you mean the xbox way? The same developer of games make the PS3 ones also.. Your argument for why xbox is shit is invalid. They are both good at being consoles.. But quality over quantity? Is that why alot of games have better quality on xbox? eg. COD Black Ops

ahahaha what do you mean?

given that GT5 was GT4 with a new set of shoes on (seriously most of the cars looked like straight ports), I fail to see WHERE these extra years of development went. I was expecting something mindblowing, I got GT4 with cars that refuse to turn, with graphics on par with Forza 2.

Most people (especially xbox or pc fans or just gt haters) get completely messed up when calculating how long it took to make gt5. They assume that gt5 went into production the moment gt4 was finished. They also forget that there were 3 mini gt5 games released before gt5 plus gt for psp. They also ignore the fact that the physics engine from gt5 prologue was scrapped and wasn't used in gt5. And finally, gt5 only had 2 official release date delays. The first from march to November then the few week delay then. Any other 'delay' was purely off rumoured release dates. If i start a rumour saying that forza 4 is coming out tomorrow then if or when it comes out i can rant on about how delayed it has been like all the forza fans do about gt5.

Does anyone remember the old nissan patrol ads with the old guy saying "i've always been a cruiser man". Well that is what the ps3 vs xbox or gt5 vs forza debate will always be like (with either side being the grumpy old cruiser owner who is refusing to acknowledge any good points about the other console/game).

Despite polyphony digital bringing out other gt games between gt4 and gt5, it still took too long.

Look at mgs for instance. They brought out 3 games and mgs4 still came out on schedule mid 2008. Same goes for gow3; who started from scratch and after a team structure change also. Both games are awesome and it is VERY obvious that a lot of work went into them. Gt5 otoh isn't as obvious as one would think.

Btw, I'm not bagging gt5, I like the game... I was just expecting a LOT more than a polished gt4 with some weather effects.

Does anyone remember the old nissan patrol ads with the old guy saying "i've always been a cruiser man". Well that is what the ps3 vs xbox or gt5 vs forza debate will always be like (with either side being the grumpy old cruiser owner who is refusing to acknowledge any good points about the other console/game).

I don't think either console is shit.. They are both good for playing games. Saying PS3 or Xobx is shit by comparing Farza and GT5 is stupid. That's like watching a DVD movie and not enjoying it. Then turn around saying the DVD player is shit because of that..

Haters gonna hate

i never said forza or xbox are shit (and if i did, twas only to get a rise)....i just preffer the PS3 and GT5......played em both and all. love all forms of gaming, be it console or PC.

just love seeing you guys fire up about it. why do you care so much???

Edited by boiracer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...