Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey was wondering if any one could tell me if iam able to use my micro tech afr meter to tune e85 and if I switch it to the alcohol setting

and what afr ratio should I target

and will my nitrous fuel jetting need changing as I am running a direct port kit and a single fogger kit and do not want to hit the gas and it to be lean

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348913-e85-tuning/
Share on other sites

aslong as your afr meter is hooked up to a proper wideband and not one of those useless gauges that uses the stock o2 sensor. if your not sure about target afr's and lambda the least confusing way is to leave the wideband set to petrol and tune to petrol afr's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348913-e85-tuning/#findComment-5607847
Share on other sites

from my own research and tuning experience ive seen the following work on e85 cars using gas widebands...

idle = 13.9-14.2 afr

accelerating in vacuum = 14.7-15 afr

light load (0-5psi) = 12.5-13 afr

moderate load (6-20psi) = 11.5afr

full load/WOT (20psi+) = 10.5-11afr

whether or not that is conservative or aggressive is your job to figure out but in my opinion e85 can run those gas afr's comfortably.

i'm currently in the same boat as you - im tuning e85 with a gas wideband till i do my research on buying a lambda wideband.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348913-e85-tuning/#findComment-5607956
Share on other sites

thats pretty rich for e85. you can farely safely go a bit leaner than you can with petrol (by leaner i mean higher afr number/lambda, still more physical fuel than petrol).

but whats best power wise is debateable, richer can take more timing but takes longer to reach peak pressure, resulting is peak pressure at pretty much the same time as a leaner mix with less timing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348913-e85-tuning/#findComment-5607961
Share on other sites

from my own research and tuning experience ive seen the following work on e85 cars using gas widebands...

idle = 13.9-14.2 afr

accelerating in vacuum = 14.7-15 afr

light load (0-5psi) = 12.5-13 afr

moderate load (6-20psi) = 11.5afr

full load/WOT (20psi+) = 10.5-11afr

whether or not that is conservative or aggressive is your job to figure out but in my opinion e85 can run those gas afr's comfortably.

i'm currently in the same boat as you - im tuning e85 with a gas wideband till i do my research on buying a lambda wideband.

What's a gas wideband? Wideband meters measure presence of oxygen not afrs and express the result as an afr so there is no need to adjust for E85 you can just use the same "afr" targets.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348913-e85-tuning/#findComment-5607978
Share on other sites

if you're talking lambda then yes, you could use the same gauge (but not the same lambda values). a gas calibrated afr gauge will always show the afr's for gas, its not showing the true values for e85.

for example;

gas stoich = 1 lambda (14.7 afr)

gas moderate boost = 0.85 lambda (12.5afr)

e85 stoich = 1 lambda (9.76afr)

e85 moderate boost = 0.71 lambda (6.92afr)

what your afr gauge does is multiply the lambda values by its target fuel's stoich which is how we get our target afr's.

so on a gas afr gauge you arent seeing the 9.76 stoich of e85, you're seeing the 14.7 of gas (e85 stoich will always be 14.7afr on a gas wideband as you are still multiplying by 1, but that is where the similarity stops).

therefore, on a gas calibrated afr gauge you will multiply e85's lambda values by 14.7.

e85 moderate boost = 0.71 x 14.7 = 10.43afr on a gas calibrated wideband.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348913-e85-tuning/#findComment-5608135
Share on other sites

All highly confusing but correct. I had the same issues when converting mine to e85, I decided, as I was planning to swap back to petrol occasionally, that I would leave the wideband in petrol AFR's and tune it to much the same values as Security. Its been running fine now for nearly a year so the tune must be fairly safe, EGT's never go above 650c.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348913-e85-tuning/#findComment-5608170
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...