Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for a turbo for a high compression, high flowing 3L motor (Subaru EZ30 horizontal 6) that will make 300awkw on as low boost as possible.

All the new single turbos suitable for that power range on low boost aren't very exciting in terms of compressor efficiency island width because they are all designed for high boost (eg. Garrett GTX, GT and BW EFR)

For example at 0.75 bar, the GT3582R is at least 68% efficient from 22lb/min to 48.5lb/min, a range of 26.5lb/min. The GTX3582R is from 22 to 54, a range of 32lb/min

BUT twin GT2860R 707160-5 is at least 68% efficient from 23lb/min to 62lb/min, a range of 39 lb/min! So it's efficiency starts at the same spot as the GT3582R but ends 14lb/min further!

I want this kind of thing out of a single turbo and I can't see ANY. Is there anything out there?

Edited by bradsm87
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350072-any-good-low-boost-single-turbo/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I wish I damn could but generally a turbo that can flow efficiently for 300kw at say 1.5 bar will struggle to efficiently flow 250rwkw at 0.75 bar, no matter how big the engine. Look at how the compressor maps move up and to the right instead of straight up.

Eg. a GT3076R will make 300rwkw no worries on an SR20 at 1.6 bar but it generally won't make 300rwkw on a 3l motor at 0.8 bar, u need a bigger turbo or more boost.

Also I can't push the turbo to it's very limits because charge air will get too hot because it's going on an unopened engine with 10.7:1 comp cast pistons so I wouldn't want it going past the 70% efficiency mark. It'll need E85 and low cool boost to stay alive!

Edited by bradsm87

I think you will struggle to find anything that will make the power you want at such low boost.

it could be done but would need to be up around the GT40 range. but the lag would out way the benefit of making 300awkw imo.

What about a GTX3582 twin scroll rear and 1.06 it should keep the heat out of it and will close to your power goal on E85..

problem is a GTX35 will be laggy as well. it might make the power but it isn't going to feel crisp at all. it will drive very lazy.

that's the problem with small displacement though really.

i doubt there is any normal turbo that can achieve such an aim on a 2.5L

problem is a GTX35 will be laggy as well. it might make the power but it isn't going to feel crisp at all. it will drive very lazy.

that's the problem with small displacement though really.

i doubt there is any normal turbo that can achieve such an aim on a 2.5L

In the OP he stated the engine is a EZ30 (3L),

but yeah it wont be an ideal set up but will give the numbers he wants and thats about it... :mellow:

Well they are on a 4ltr lol, that's s fair increase[ over a 3.

In the OP he stated the engine is a EZ30 (3L),

but yeah it wont be an ideal set up but will give the numbers he wants and thats about it... :mellow:

ah yr, missed that.

either way even with a 3ltr its not going to come easy.

the only way would perhaps be some hybrid turbo, and we all know the lucky dip that goes there.

how sure of this are you? al has a 3076 on his 3 litre and it makes tons of power everywhere and it makes over 300rwkw

why on earth would you go for a Gt35xx when a GT30xx will do what you want, earlier, more power everywhere and should have enough peak

are you saying the 3076 is too small? ref; "wont make 300rwkw at 0.8 bar, need bigger turbo or bigger boost"

if you size the housing correcly then this shouldnt be a problem

ie dont fit a mega small housing and choke, fit a larger size housing

issue is low boost as possible, thing is even with a 3Lwith a 3076 you are still looking at what, 18psi or so?

depends on ones definition of low, but in mine... that's now low, but there is no stantout alternative.

how sure of this are you? al has a 3076 on his 3 litre and it makes tons of power everywhere and it makes over 300rwkw

why on earth would you go for a Gt35xx when a GT30xx will do what you want, earlier, more power everywhere and should have enough peak

are you saying the 3076 is too small? ref; "wont make 300rwkw at 0.8 bar, need bigger turbo or bigger boost"

if you size the housing correcly then this shouldnt be a problem

ie dont fit a mega small housing and choke, fit a larger size housing

That only solves the problem on the exhaust side. The 76 compressor won't flow 300rwkw at 1 bar. U need to size up turbos to make same power on lower boost, regardless of engine size. eg. The Perrin EZ30 used a GT3582R to start with and made 300-320awkw with a GT3582R at 15 psi.

Looks like the extra cash for twin -5's might be worth it. It would allow shorter exhaust runners being a boxer engine, just a lot more stuffing round with oil/water lines and pipe work.

Edited by bradsm87

yeah agreed... when OP said low boost he meant really low .75Bar

If it was my car i would put the GTX35 on in. then see how much boost it can hanle :rofl:

might even make 400awkw :banana:

LOL at seeing how much boost cast 10.7:1 pistons and pinkey finger sized rods can take.

LOL at seeing how much boost cast 10.7:1 pistons and pinkey finger sized rods can take.

seriously though, your engine wont last forever making that sort of power and will need a rebuild before too long...

keep that in mind when choosing your turbo.

I know you didn't ask this, but IMHO you shouldn't be worrying about flowing over 50lb/min on .8bar - even on an EZ30, unless you have got pretty fancy with it. Also if you are going to be using a lowish boost level and E85, a few points of compressor efficiency aren't going to break the thing - I'd be worrying more about minimal exhaust manifold pressure.

Look at the compressor map for the Borg Warner S300SX 83-75, I would be leaning towards one of those with the 1.00a/r twin scroll T4 turbine housing if I were doing what you are looking at doing.

People have done cool things with low boost on EZ30s but they are pretty fragile. A mate of mine actually has a forged/turbocharged EG33 in a GC8 which so far makes pretty decent power on low boost though its pretty hard to keep cool haha.

-9 would be the better choice for 300 wouldn't they?

roughly around the 15psi mark is all you should need given a 2.6 needs around 18

this is all subjective as head and flow have a fair factor here too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...