Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been thinking about fuel for my rb30. I was going to go e85 but we can't get it at the pumps where I'm at. I was going to ship it by the barrel, fill up for races(time attack, drag, HPDE, etc), and use pump gas for the street.

BUT! If I'm going to be shipping fuel and making an alcohol safe fuel system, why not use methanol? According to my math, even at 75/25 meth-to-pump it should make more power than E85. It should also run cooler, be easier to find (lots of drag cars here,) and be cheaper.

Anybody gone done this road before?

Interesting fact- in china, where corn is expensive, flex fuel vehicles run M85!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/
Share on other sites

Nobody has any experience? I keep looking around and all I'm finding is a lot of bs about methanol being dangerous and toxic. It's actually less dangerous and toxic than gasoline.

I think the only reason it isn't used is because Injectors large enough to use methanol and still idle and run normal only recently became available. (id2000)

Unless someone has a good reason not to do it I'm gonna give it a shot.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5630372
Share on other sites

I can add that buying E85 at the pump will only give many inconsistent results.

Preferred race fuel is C16 or Aviation fuels as they prove to be more stable throughout the year.

As for Power, Methanol makes a bigger bang but more costly to obtain. You will require some form of license in most developed countries.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5630563
Share on other sites

I've been thinking about fuel for my rb30. I was going to go e85 but we can't get it at the pumps where I'm at. I was going to ship it by the barrel, fill up for races(time attack, drag, HPDE, etc), and use pump gas for the street.

BUT! If I'm going to be shipping fuel and making an alcohol safe fuel system, why not use methanol? According to my math, even at 75/25 meth-to-pump it should make more power than E85. It should also run cooler, be easier to find (lots of drag cars here,) and be cheaper.

Anybody gone done this road before?

Interesting fact- in china, where corn is expensive, flex fuel vehicles run M85!

What is the engine built for? Compression, expected boost, is it intercooled, what is the injector location?

Edited by rob82
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5630810
Share on other sites

I can add that buying E85 at the pump will only give many inconsistent results.

Preferred race fuel is C16 or Aviation fuels as they prove to be more stable throughout the year.

As for Power, Methanol makes a bigger bang but more costly to obtain. You will require some form of license in most developed countries.

Pump e85 is fine provided you tune for the variations. We can match c16 but @ $1 a litre....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5630944
Share on other sites

If you are talking about E85 vs meth, why not go WMI? You get pretty much the same power boost as you would when tuning for E85 and the methanol cooler running = the best of both worlds. And you won't use much unless you are boosting, don't need huge injectors, can run on pump fuel everywhere, don't need to upgrade any fuel lines or systems and there are some great packages out there for it. Plus you can vary the amount of meth by juggling with nozzle sizes and multiple nozzles. It is on tap just waiting for you to boost it!

As an example I used probably 100-150ml in 400km of highway driving and I have a 3.5 litre reservoir. I know that when you race with it it is used heaps more, but you can top up between laps etc.

And mixed 50/50 WM in a container is pretty much inert.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5631965
Share on other sites

One bad thing I've seen with methanol is it burns with almost invisible flames, though E85 could be the same.

All those burnout cars that run it seem to set their tyres and half the track alight though. I also saw an evo with big cams shooting 1m flames on the overrun after it supposedly had been tuned, whether this was the car or the fuel I do not know.

Anyone know more ?

Edited by Rolls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5633915
Share on other sites

One bad thing I've seen with methanol is it burns with almost invisible flames, though E85 could be the same.

All those burnout cars that run it seem to set their tyres and half the track alight though. I also saw an evo with big cams shooting 1m flames on the overrun after it supposedly had been tuned, whether this was the car or the fuel I do not know.

Anyone know more ?

The 15% fuel in the methanol would cause the flame to be visible :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5633942
Share on other sites

BoostedR's build data from the -5 vs GTRS thread

I have built a RB31/26DETT 824hp -engine hp

264 9.8 HKS

Tomei Dumps

3" x 2 (no mufflers)

530ft lb @ 2800rpm

22psi max

Garrett -10's

Ported std manifolds

BP98 with 10% methanol

Motec

That result proves you can lean on the engine a lot more with just 10% methanol. A water/meth injection setup would produce a similar result.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5633983
Share on other sites

I have an aquamist hfs-6 on the car right now. It works good but won't give the same performance as mixing meth. It's also something else to break at the track.

The 15% gasoline is supposed to add color to the flame also. I might try a 50/50 mix and move up from there.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5634225
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...