Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I kinda just jumped into this because I accidentally starved my HX35 7blade of oil :( . A word to the wise, don't us F'ing stock Nissan oil feed fittings! There are _THREE_ hidden ninja restrictors! So I landed a brand new billet 5557 T3 .82 a/r rear for a good price. It will be going in my s13 with 25DE/30 with a tubular manifold (unfortunately its a T4 divided manifold so i will have to make an adapter :( ). Damn shame I don't get to put the twin scroll to use!

Looking for a very responsive street setup and a relatively quick 1/4 mile dragger (hoping for 11s!).

I know the new generation of Precision turbos is relatively new, but what do you guys think; Will i accomplish my goals above? Should I have gone larger so I could utilize a T4 divided setup? Is the T3 .82 going to run out of puff?

Thanks guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/351669-precision-5557-in-an-rb30/
Share on other sites

But how can such a big turbo have the response that I'm looking for? The guy says "The GT4088 could be up your street, good responce and I dont think it ran out of puff." Good response? A GT40!?!?

Edited by ST240

I kinda just jumped into this because I accidentally starved my HX35 7blade of oil :( . A word to the wise, don't us F'ing stock Nissan oil feed fittings! There are _THREE_ hidden ninja restrictors! So I landed a brand new billet 5557 T3 .82 a/r rear for a good price. It will be going in my s13 with 25DE/30 with a tubular manifold (unfortunately its a T4 divided manifold so i will have to make an adapter :( ). Damn shame I don't get to put the twin scroll to use!

Looking for a very responsive street setup and a relatively quick 1/4 mile dragger (hoping for 11s!).

I know the new generation of Precision turbos is relatively new, but what do you guys think; Will i accomplish my goals above? Should I have gone larger so I could utilize a T4 divided setup? Is the T3 .82 going to run out of puff?

Thanks guys!

I have a 5557 on an rb25... It chokes the 25 and only makes 245rwkw at 20 psi... Sell it.

Did you read that link I posted?

"a 1.06a/r T4 twinscroll housing builds boost faster than a .82a/r open T3"

"From that result I'd be picking a 1.05a/r twin scroll T4 EFR8374 to be an absolute torque monster on an RB30!"

Read through the RB30 dyno results and pick a turbo from there.

Would be such a shame to not use the T4 twinscroll manifold!

If your after maximum response and dont care about wasting your twinscroll T4 manifold then go a 3076 0.82. Can make a super responsive 300rwkw, check out Al's setup first dyno on Page 4 of RB30 dyno results.

If your after maximum response and dont care about wasting your twinscroll T4 manifold then go a 3076 0.82. Can make a super responsive 300rwkw, check out Al's setup first dyno on Page 4 of RB30 dyno results.

You can get a GT3076R in a 1.06a/r twinscroll - that'd be insane. EFR7670 would be crushing, GT3582R power with better than GT3076R spool

You can get a GT3076R in a 1.06a/r twinscroll - that'd be insane. EFR7670 would be crushing, GT3582R power with better than GT3076R spool

Forgot about the 3076 in 1.06 twinscroll T4! Dont know much about this EFR7670, will have a read.

I have a 5557 on an rb25... It chokes the 25 and only makes 245rwkw at 20 psi... Sell it.

Serious? The thing is rated at 525 crank hp. What rear do you have on it?

If your after maximum response and dont care about wasting your twinscroll T4 manifold then go a 3076 0.82. Can make a super responsive 300rwkw, check out Al's setup first dyno on Page 4 of RB30 dyno results.

Wow I can't believe a T4 1.08 twin scroll spools faster than a T3 .82!!!

Isn't a 5557 somewhere between a GT3071 and a GT3076? I have the .82 rear. I saw Al's setup and thats what I'm pretty much hoping for.

Damn. Looks like I might be selling it :( .

Edited by ST240

Jeez Justin I just read your posts in the Precision Billet Turbo thread. Disappointing indeed.

I would be quite pissed if I ran the 5557 up to 20 psi on my 30 and didn't make 300 kW. I wonder how inefficient that compressor is at its "525 HP rated" capacity...

Maybe I should just be a guinea pig and run it ;) .

Serious? The thing is rated at 525 crank hp. What rear do you have on it?

Wow I can't believe a T4 1.08 twin scroll spools faster than a T3 .82!!!

Isn't a 5557 somewhere between a GT3071 and a GT3076? I have the .82 rear. I saw Al's setup and thats what I'm pretty much hoping for.

Damn. Looks like I might be selling it :( .

I have a .82 rear... drops off 21psi to 18psi from 6k-7.8k rpm and wont make any more than 250rwkw on 98... The response isn't particulary awsome for the power either..

Sell it!

I have a .82 rear... drops off 21psi to 18psi from 6k-7.8k rpm and wont make any more than 250rwkw on 98... The response isn't particulary awsome for the power either..

Sell it!

Hmm...no wonder they never really put any test results of this combo up on here.

I have a .82 rear... drops off 21psi to 18psi from 6k-7.8k rpm and wont make any more than 250rwkw on 98... The response isn't particulary awsome for the power either..

Sell it!

I coulda sworn I saw you say you had a .63 in that thread...

Well sports fans.

I'll post up the dyno sheet tomorow.... However-

I ended up making 245 odd rwkw on 98 at 20psi (that drops off to 18psi at 8000rpm) from my 5557 .63 exh housing. All the usual supporting mods, no major restrictions.

I was a little dissapointed. For the lag I would have expected 255/260ish rwkw at that boost level.

It seems high boost is needed for the numbers with these turbo's. I just didn't want to run anymore boost on a stock 100k rb25.

I'll be going to a td06...

J.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hang on. Let me get this straight. The desire is to have coilovers, BC in particular, to be MORE comfortable on Sydney roads than stock suspension? Well, that's obviously not right. BCs have crude damping design at the very best, and typically hard spring rates. BC stands for Billy Cart. And then, the desire is to put in some shitty old worn out stockers, to get it blue slipped and then put the BCs back in? And then.....what? Not worry about getting pulled up by the Plod? Because you seem to have raised a worry about paying for engineering (which actually does solve all your legality problems) and still getting pulled up.... but the only problem there is that if/when that happens you have to show your paperwork at the inspection station. Whereas, if you just swap in borrowed shitty old stockers to get it slipped now, and then you get defected in the future, you have to go find more shitty old stockers then too. You course of action looks like this set of options: Buy brand new stock type dampers, and springs. probably cost a bit more than $1k all up, but will last for the remaining life of the car. Put them in, pass inspection, drive on them forever more. Hell, they could even be really nice Bilsteins and Kings or other lower&stiffer springs if you wanted. Get the car engineered as is. ~$1k. Buy new Shockworks coilvers (or MCA) and also pay for engineering. You're spending a lot more here. But these will be the best things that you could drive around on.
    • Might be worthwhile hitting up Facebook's groups, I know most of them contain terrible people and scammers - however you might be able to find someone that's in Sydney with factory suspension you could purchase and/or hire. Just do not send any form of money anywhere, in person cash only.
    • Thanks @Duncan Ride height is fine. I think it's almost stock tbh. Happy to share a pic. I don't actually have a regular mechanic as haven't lived in Sydney too long. Could you or anyone recommend any shops in Sydney?
    • You just need a different blue slip shop (preferably one you regularly use as a mechanic), and make sure the coil overs are as close as possible to standard height
    • yeah the sugar refining companies were pushing for the same in Oz originally, all fuels were going to have 10% ethanol to make them "cheaper" (noting, that the loss in l/100 might be greater than the decrease in price). I guess they won that fight in Canadia
×
×
  • Create New...