Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok mates

So I'm building my rb25det motor, and I'm planning on pushing it to the limit.

I'm building 2 motors one with a stock head and one with a built head.

I'm using 87mm cp pistons and eagle rods in both motors. The comp is 8.5:1 for both motors,

The one with the built head is a 240sx and the one with the stock head is an r33 skyline.

Now the skyline has the following work done.

1. ACL main and rod bearings

2. N1 oil and water pump

3. ARP main and head studs

4. Crank collar and block to head restrictor ( one in the middle, lash lifters)

5. AMS GT950R turbo And 6boost manifold with 44mm tial waste gate.

6. Custom intake with top mount fuel rail and Sard 800cc injectors

7. Split fire coils, with HKS twin power.

8. MLS head gasket Cosmetic 1.2mm

9. Full exhaust with FMIC

10. External fuel pump and regulator

11. Power fc

Ross crank pulley

Clutch master twin plate aluminum fly wheel clutch kit.

Now that's the skyline. From what I've learnt from SAU I have tried and applied to this build.

Is there any other things I should do for this build, I'm planning on 500hp.

For the 240sx all of the above is basically the same just the head is built and the turbo is a GT42R with 60mm Tial waste gate. Planning on 800hp.

The oil pump in the 240sx is a greedy unit, I'm using a high volume sump, Haltech PS2000, Other than that the rest is the same.

I have left the head detail's out, But it will have valves and angle job, guides, cams , port and polished.

Please feel free to make a suggestion thanks in advance. the pics are of the old motor in the r33 skyline

post-37293-0-35908000-1296617041_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-05075800-1296617096_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-94472300-1296617152_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-34257700-1296617227_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-27398300-1296617294_thumb.jpg

Edited by MJTru
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/352533-building-2-rb25-motors/
Share on other sites

From what i have heard the N1 oil pump for rb25 is good for 7500rpms mate. But in my last motor i sometimes ran it to 9000 and it lived. After taking the motor apart the pump looked fine, but i know at those rpms for a long time would kill it. The skyline motor failed do to detination. I ran about 26 psi on pump gas. All the signs are there. But this time will be different. 110+ octain for shore mate. I also am adding the oil drain kit from spoolimport to both heads, on both cars.

Does anyone know of some good 1000cc injector, with all info (ms accross different voltage points) Using Haltech ps2000.

thanks

Has anyone used the spoolimport oil drain kit for the rb25det and 26 heads.????

Will this control my oil problem. When i push the car hard the oil would fill up the catch can, at about 26 psi, for long high rpms. What i have done is put the oil restrictor in the block only in the middle cause i still have the lash lifter set up, and the spool oil drain kit.

post-37293-0-47347900-1296781916_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-54922500-1296781931_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-11569400-1296781999_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-00213100-1296782049_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-59086500-1296782108_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-72875100-1296782157_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-34728500-1296782199_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-99638100-1296782254_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-77357400-1296782302_thumb.jpg

post-37293-0-87639700-1296782392_thumb.jpg

Edited by MJTru

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...