Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest RedLineGTR

From what i have seen of some dyno results the Series 2 for the 95 model gtst's are superior to the series 1 ecus because the 95 series ecus have a better air/fuel ratio pretty much a better factory tune. I'm not sure about the 96 series 2 ecus etc but in general year after year of production of these cars they usally fix little bugs and clean up fuel maps abit etc. Try and find one that is specific to your model, if you cant find a series 2 one try and go for whatever you can get if you need quick. My 2 Cents

From what i have seen of some dyno results the Series 2 for the 95 model gtst's are superior to the series 1 ecus because the 95 series ecus have a better air/fuel ratio pretty much a better factory tune. I'm not sure about the 96 series 2 ecus etc but in general year after year of production of these cars they usally fix little bugs and clean up fuel maps abit etc. Try and find one that is specific to your model, if you cant find a series 2 one try and go for whatever you can get if you need quick. My 2 Cents

i thought series II only start from 96 models up?

because i think i have a late 95 model, and i;ve only seen 96 models and above which start having extra air bag, different interior, kit and etc.

or is there actually a 95 series II ?

i thought series II only start from 96 models up?

because i think i have a late 95 model, and i;ve only seen 96 models and above which start having extra air bag, different interior, kit and etc.

or is there actually a 95 series II ?

The '95 model is often referred to as the series 1.5 because it looks like a series 1, but has many series 2 components, such as ECU, engine, AFM, etc. If yours is a late 95 model, it's definitely a series 1.5 and has the improved bits in it.

The '95 model is often referred to as the series 1.5 because it looks like a series 1, but has many series 2 components, such as ECU, engine, AFM, etc. If yours is a late 95 model, it's definitely a series 1.5 and has the improved bits in it.

ok, thought so too, but that still doesnt asnwer

if there is a 95 model series II?

The '95 model is often referred to as the series 1.5 because it looks like a series 1, but has many series 2 components, such as ECU, engine, AFM, etc. If yours is a late 95 model, it's definitely a series 1.5 and has the improved bits in it.

i think that answers your question perfectly. its a 1.5 so No there is no or highly unlikely that there is a 95 series 2.

I have an october 95 series 2... has the different squarer headlights, bonnet, grill, bumper, passenger + drivers airbag, update interior, colour coded skyline badge on the boot instead of the clear one that matches the indicators and so on. Mine has the mesh grill instead of the letter box grill, apparently an indicator of early series 2.

yep got a nov 95 series I but shit load of series II stuff like motor, exterior bits but no second airbag, talking bout airbags my light on the dash constantly has the airbag light on anyidea how to get rid of it and yes i don't have the stock steering wheel any more so no airbag

I have an october 95 series 2... has the different  squarer headlights, bonnet, grill, bumper,  passenger  + drivers airbag, update interior, colour coded skyline badge on the boot instead of the clear one that matches the indicators and so on. Mine has the mesh grill instead of the letter box grill, apparently an indicator of early series 2.

there we go :)

From memory when looking into my ECU ('95 Series 1.5) their are 7 different R33 GTS-t ECU models. The ECU I had was in the middle of that list (4th or 5th). I'd love to know what the difference is of each individual model.

Here is a pic of my Stock ECU: http://skylines.pnc.com.au/ecu.jpg

If your looking for ECU get your self a Power FC direct replacement ECU. Less hassles of wiring, uses original sensors and is tuneable up to 600hp, what I like about this ECU is the detonation warning light which is really handy for monitoring purposes. It's about $1600 brand new incl. GST with warranty and tech support if needed. I beleive the price is only for the ECU excludes hand controller.

The dates the jap use (for years) are based on eras. The last one, under emperor Hirohito was Showa, the current one is Heisei under emperor Akihito. The era began in 1989, so that year is Heisei 1, 1995 is therefore year 7

You can find the build date on your jap compliance plate, if you have the original books, you will be able to find the delivery date too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...