Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys just finishing off my intercooler piping on the vl. the kit i bought had 3" cold side piping from intercooler to throttle body. however on the hot side it had 2.5" but the cooler is 3" in and out. i have one more pipe to make which is not in engine bay is from the hot side of cooler. now i was going to make this pipe 3" so it would go into intercooler easier or should i buy a reducer for cooler and have it go into cooler using 2.5" like the rest of the hot pipe?

would it boost in anyway making it 3"

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/353363-opinions-on-hot-pipe-for-cooler/
Share on other sites

im going to be chasing around 300rwkw aventually but by then im going to get custom piping done. the kit had 2.5" from the turbo to the cooler however it was a vlt kit so i have had to modify it a little. thats why im asking if i should make the pipe from under air box to the cooler on the turbo side 3" or 2.5" considering from the turbo is aready 2.5".

sory for the confusion but this is not for the inlet of the turbo its for the hot pipe from turbo to the intercooler

Edited by luvpsi

make it the same size as the turbo outlet

have a look at the R.I.P.S. F E D . from turbo to water box is only like 2.5(looks tiny ) from water box to throttle is 100mm . god knows what power that makes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...