Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A little while ago I was punting around a corner I know very well. Sometimes, when I'm feeling frisky, I hit it hard in 1st (tiptronic) and can get a smooth drift til traction catches up with me. This was with 235/45ZR17 tyres.

Now tonight was different because it was the first time I'd hit that corner since I got the 225/40ZR18 tyres on.

I had actually decided to go quickly but within traction around the corner and changed into 2nd gear before I got to the apex so I was barely on boost but with next to no warning the back let go in the same fashion as it would have if I'd meant to drift it. I didn't lose it, just grabbed it back the way I usually would but I was surprised.

Now my question is; Is it just my imagination or do lower profile tyres by their nature give less warning at the limit of traction or is it possible that the width was an issue?

As a side; Can anyone translate the full codes I posted above?

PS. I felt the slide was smoother with these tyres.

235/45/R17:

235=tyre width in mm;

45=thickness of sideway as a % of the trye width (ie: 45% of the tyre width.);

R17=17" tyre, Radials.

Yes a smaller profile tyre will have less flex and be more responsive. Having less width will also have less traction. Different Brands/models will have different road holding characteristics, due to the different compounds. Finally whether and foreign residue on the road will also play a major part on road handling.

It also depends on the compound of the tyre.

Being different brand (I presume) they will handle differently.

Some tyres give you heaps of warning before they let go, some stick really well right to the end and then let go really fast.

J

OK Sarpi, last 1 first.

225/40ZR18 means a tyre 225mm across the tread, 40 means the height of the tyre from the rim to the tread is 40% of 225mm (=90mm in this case). Z is the speed rating (= lots, not sure exactly but over 230), R is radial (they all are these days) and 18 is the size of the rim they fit on.

So the main thing about your new tyres is they are 1 cm narrower and on 1inch bigger rims.

As for "feel"....

firstly, are they the same brand and type of tyres? that's the main factor, there is a huge range in feel when tyres let go....generally the worse the tyres the more warning you get...with top ® tyres they basically stick like mad until they very suddenly let go.

If they are the same type of tyres you might be noticing the difference in sidewall height....but both 17s and 18s are big wheels which will have minimal sidewall flex.

Also make sure your tyre pressures are right for the tyres, normally up to 45 hot is about right.

Being a lower profile tyre, the sidewall is narrower. Therefore there is less flex available in the sidewall to absorb distortions. The tyre presumably puts a smaller footprint on the road. So the limit of adhesion (forwards + sideways) is going to be different (presumably less) with the 225/40ZR18 than with the 235/45ZR17.

If it is a little bumpy, you will find that there will be a tendency toward 'sudden' traction loss on hard cornering due to the reduced sidewall flex.

This is why I went from 235 30 ZR17 to 255 40 ZR17 for daily driving

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...