Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, my water pump split the other day and drained most of the coolant, i noticed quite quickly that there was a problem, but with a very tight inlet cam and some other tests done, its confirmed, my head is warped >_<

What i'm looking at is using a engine crane to lift the body over the engine( no i don't have a hoist), leave the motor and box together mounted on the subframe, replace the head, reasemble and refit.

I'd like to know if you guy recon its the best way to tackle the situation.

only thing i was thinking is lifting the car that high, would the rear bumper hit the ground....maybe??

any help from people that have removed the engine out the bottom without a hoist would be appreciated also.

you might not get it high enough to clear the engine and that, easiest way is just to pull the engine and gearbox out as one that way you can still push the car around and steer it easy without having to fight an engine crane aswell

You could try and put the car up on ramps with the back wheels and stands at the front. Wheel a trolly under the engine and gearbox and lift the trolly up to the engine and gearbox, then lower it down to the floor. Then use your crane to lift the front of the car up high enough so you can roll the trolly out. The ramps under the rear wheels will ensure you dont scrape the back end of the car on the ground. Using a block and tackle to the roof to lift the car is another approach ive seen.

Its a lot of hard work if you havent done it before, so its a good idea to get someone involved thats has done it to make sure you dont un-necessarily remove things that dont need to be removed. You'd be surprised just how complete the whole assembly does come out.

You could take the head off with the engine still in the car..

But you have an engine crane obviously.. why try lift the car up? just take the bonnet off and pull the engine out the normal way.

I have thought about it both ways, done some searches on SAU too, i was originally thinking i would remove the head in the car, but after some reading it seemed some people thought it was easier to just remove the whole engine.......

Initially i was going to remove all head bolts and pipes etc and try are remove the head with the turbos and plenum intact, obviously using an engine crane or block and tackle, reassemble all gear to the new head, with jun cams,:thumbsup: and refit.

I have removed this motor before and plenty of others amongst buiding a few rb30's, so i'm no stranger to the whole engine thing, just the 32 GTR engine / engine bay is kinda tight, just trying to see thoughts on the easiest way.

Dropping the whole subframe from a GTR is the hard way of doing the engine.

Leave the box in and only pull the engine.

Heads in situ are not not hard.

Leave the turbos in place and undo the two four bolt flanges, manifolds stay bolted to the head

Strip the front and remove timing belt etc obviously.

Remove alternator and starter motor so you can get the intake side off easier.

With the intake side off the rest is simple.

I don't ever recall pulling an engine to do a head, I know it's common practice but unnessisary.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...