Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got this spare with a car i bought, someone told me its a vlt rear housing (.63) and has the same stud pattern, but i dont know what the specs are, aside from the fact that it has been high flowed.

also, does anyone know if the highflowed components (wheels, housing etc) would be interchangeable with an r33 s2 rear housing? as ive already had a custom dump pip made to suit it.SAM_0041.jpgSAM_0039.jpg

SAM_0040.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356595-what-kind-of-turbo-is-this/
Share on other sites

do not use this turbo on a skyline. they are shithouse old design. i had one and it was rat shit.

You might be able to get the standard housing machined out to suit depends how big the rear wheel in that turbo is.

Sell it and get a better turbo, its just not worth using the old VL design the stock turbo will be better.

That "thing" , and I'm being nice , is the dreaded bastard hi flow bitzer turbo . The housings look a bit like RB20 on the compressor side and T3 on the hot side . The hub of the turbine looks a bit like a Hitach HT18S one .

Probably bore everyone but .

1)Comp housing inlet bored out a lot so a big wheel for a smallish compressor housing .

2)Hitachi turbine big which is fine for a Ser 4/5 RX7 Rotary but iffy on a bastard hi flow .

3)Note the size of the waste gate outlet hole on the T3 turbine housing . Maybe Ok for a dinosaur 70s era 150 Kw T3 but not for any current (in the last 20 yrs) performance engine .

I would rather run your engines std turbo if in good nick than that thing .

A .

well actually its an rb30e+t in an r31 that it would be going onto, but now im thinking ill just keep the 33 s2 turbo on, even tho it may be a bit small for the 30, anyone offer a suggestion of what that highflowed one would be worthe to sell 2nd hand?

It would probably prefer the Hitachi BB VG30 turbos larger OP6 turbine housing if you can find one .

From memory an RB30ET made 153 Kw from its 50 something comp trim small turbine series T3 turbo in 0.63A/R turbine housing form . An RB 25 with the above mentioned turbine housing made I think 206 fly Kw in an R34 GTt .

A .

it appears to be:

.63 VL turbo's turbine housing with a R32's comp housing, bush bearing setup

Standard VL turbo turbine wheel or TB34 turbine wheel with a 8~12 degrees crop running a 56T 71mm comp wheel. It should be ok for about 250~260rwkws on Rb25det with average response using a strong actuator.

Need a none restrictive oil line for Rb2x engines. You will need his dump pipe as the internal gate part is in it.

anyone have any advice on if this turbo would be any good for an rb30et, drove to the dyno the other day (very sedatly), got out and the turbo was leaking oil and smoking. f**k. so im thinking about putting a rebuild kit thru the hi flowed one and putting it on instead before i head back to the dyno, what kind of rebuild kit would i even have to get? or would it just be a mix and match on seals and wheels?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...