Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm looking to buy an r33 gtr, but i'm not sure why the blue plate is so faded?

See the image post-49206-0-97479300-1299751891_thumb.jpg

Does this look dodgy, how can i check?

Paint on that one is pretty bad, but at least those rivets used to attach the plate look the same as on my one, and the numbers don't look dodgy - not sure mate, make a call or inspect more R33's and see how their build plates look.

Thanks for all the feedback guys.

Luckily I can still read the numbers on the build plate so I'm going to do a VIC roads check for $24.

I just find it strange that the build plate is faded, it looks unnaturally faded when compared to the surroundings.

engine-bay-02.JPG

Also, Is it normal for the VIN number to be pop riveted near the passenger side strut tower?

VIN-number-01.jpg

compliance-plate.jpg

Thanks for all the feedback guys.

Luckily I can still read the numbers on the build plate so I'm going to do a VIC roads check for $24.

I just find it strange that the build plate is faded, it looks unnaturally faded when compared to the surroundings.

engine-bay-02.JPG

Also, Is it normal for the VIN number to be pop riveted near the passenger side strut tower?

VIN-number-01.jpg

compliance-plate.jpg

Looks same as my one, even the aluminium plate with the 6T91 number looks the same, my one is rivetted near the front right headlight. I think that's how they used to do them when complianced - your is Sept 2000.

^^^like he said, cleaning can kill anything. and the white rivets that hold it in are not reusable, and generally a good sign that the plate hasnt been tampered with. although that is a strange spot for the VIN plate. but it is an old import i guess.

Mine is actually engraved into the strut tower. It's a compliance thing and nothing to worry about. By law they have to put the aus vin number (with 6U900 in it) somewhere in the engine bay. Some compliers will even just engrave it below the jap vin on the firewall but strut tower is very common

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...