Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

anyone here running these ? saw them on evolutionm.net and Supraforums.

just wondering what is needed to drop one in a R32 GT-R

$165.00 USD shipped it says on the site(awdmotorsports), probably talking about the US but seems like a good price for the Aeromotive

Application guide can be found here for the Aeromotive:Drop in for bunch of cars but doesnt say Skyline though ;/

http://static.speedu..._2_appguide.pdf

The aeromotive 340l/ph fuel pump is a mirror image of the walbro 255l/ph. What that means is the pulls (+/-) are reversed. If you're going to install this you will need to swap the pins on the fuel pump jumper harness so it goes to the wiring harness in the proper polarity.

$169.00 USD here

Aeromotive 340LPH IN-TANK Pump - TopSpeed Inc. Store

340hppump.jpg

The Aeromotive 340 Stealth Fuel Pump is a high-output, in-tank, electric fuel pump that fits most popular EFI applications. The Aeromotive 340 is a compact, lightweight pump that bolts into most existing hanger assemblies. (to find your vehicle, see the applications guide below)

What sets the 340 Stealth Pump apart is its superior flow throughout a wide pressure range. Compared to a typical 255 lph pump at 40 psi, the 340 boasts 340 lph at the same pressure. Over 30% more flow. This pump is ideal for applications requiring more flow while retaining the factory lines and mounting provisions available in the Original Equipment (O.E.) configuration. The 340 is also perfect for use as a universal replacement for applications that require more flow to support forced air power adders such as turbo and supercharged applications.

• P/N 11140 is the same configuration as the GSS340

• Fits most vehicles where a 255 lph is applicable.

• Center Inlet

• Designed for in-tank use only

• Can be used in Carbureted or EFI applications

• Turbine pump mechanism increases durability and can be used in pulse modulated applications.

These include the Filter kit and everything below..

Includes Pump & All Drop Parts:

• Pump

• Filter

• Wiring Pigtail

• Rubber Hose

• (2) Clamps

• Rubber Grommet

Deatschwerks 300+ lph pump seems to flow about the same and costs also $169.00 USD

Click the link to see more info and what cars its direct drop in

DeatschWerks.com | 300+ LPH High Flow In-Tank Fuel Pump | Fuel Pumps | DeatschWerks

Side by side on paper the Aeromotive and DW300 look almost identical. At 90 psi fuel pressure both seem to pump out 200LPH. According to deatschwerks this pump gains significant flow from higher voltage.

Outflow the Competition.

Introducing the highest flowing in-tank pump yet. Surpassing the competition 300LPH at a time.

  • Flows 300+ litres per hour
  • In-tank application specific fitment
  • Ethanol compatible
  • 3-year no-fault warranty
  • Quiet and reliable turbine impeller

Universal pump kit includes:

  • 2"x2" sock
  • Electrical connector
  • 4" of fuel line
  • Miscellaneous hardware

RK23300lphin-tankpump-1-1.jpg

DW301MarketingTechData2.jpg

well they are not quite as good as you might think. looking at the first one yes it flows 325L/ph but only at 40psi. BASE fuel pressure in a skyline is 3bar = 43.5psi. add the average 20psi boost to that and you get 63psi, call it 65psi. at 65psi it flows approximately 275L/ph and note that's at 13.5V. at 12V (which most pumps get if lucky) it will be quite a bit less. that is less flow than a nismo drop in pump which have been found to easily flow their rated 276L/ph even at 12V and with normal operating pressure around 60psi. 275L/ph is enough to supply only 750cci injectors safely. so the first pump is good for 750cc injectors or around 700hp.

the deatchwerks pump is about the same. at 13.5V (again a bit optimistic for most cars) and 65psi it flows something like 270L/ph. again enough to supply 700-750cc injectors and support around 750hp. if you're going to use one you need to either test what voltage your pump supply is getting, and if not enough you'll need to do a direct power feed to the pump to get it some more juice.

anyway, they look ok overall i guess and are built to a price. still for piece of mind in my own car if I needed to supply some 700cc injectors there is only 1 pump choice for me. nismo (or sard/tomei they are the same). the 3 year warranty is nice on the deatchwerks pump and aeromotive do make good products but for a skyline with solid, reliable bolt in options like nismo that is what I chose.

I looked into these when i was doing my e85 conversion.

but like BeerBaron said with the base fuel pressure being over 40psi i was going to run 25psi of boost pushing fuel pressure to over 65psi.

i have 1000cc injectors on e85 so it needs quite a bit of fuel flow.

i went the twin walbro pumps mounted in tank, running a second fuel line down the car and merging into a single -8 feed into the rail i think from memory?

i dont get any issues with flow running two fuel pumps.

I've also had them setup to a direct feed from the battery so they get full voltage.

Thanks for the reply BeerBaron ;)

I looked into these when i was doing my e85 conversion.

but like BeerBaron said with the base fuel pressure being over 40psi i was going to run 25psi of boost pushing fuel pressure to over 65psi.

i have 1000cc injectors on e85 so it needs quite a bit of fuel flow.

i went the twin walbro pumps mounted in tank, running a second fuel line down the car and merging into a single -8 feed into the rail i think from memory?

i dont get any issues with flow running two fuel pumps.

I've also had them setup to a direct feed from the battery so they get full voltage.

Yeah i was just looking for some more info on them since they are a lot cheaper then say Nismo etc and Deatschwerks come with 3 year warranty which is nice

saw this posted over on Supraforums by Mario @ Titan Motorsports

This is his personal Supra with 3x Aeromotive pumps on E85

The car just made 1152WHP on the pumps, stock alternator, stock wring, and plenty of room to make more power. I think this will be good for 1250whp on e85 and probably 1400whp on gasoline. Base fuel pressure was 45psi and the injectors were precisions 225lb/hr
base fuel pressure was 45psi, running e85 out of the pump, and there is plenty of room for more power, unfortunately we reached the limits of my turbo. These pumps do what they advertise 100%. Also note that i'm running a stock TT alternator, stock wires, and dual electric fans.
The flow bench data on the hanger proves they flow more than walbros, people are maxing out walbros @ 1150 on gasoline with similar setups. there is no doub't this pumps flow more in the bench and the real world than the walbros. You can make the case on the densos, as they are closer in flow capabilities to the aeromotives, but then you also have to take into account the densors are much louder, bulkier and draw more electricity.

one more quote that was posted on Supraforums 570 whp with a single 340 on E85 with room for more sounds pretty good given that E85 needs about ~30% more fuel

I'm liking my Aero 340, mine is wired direct to battery power and with 800cc sidefeeds I hit ~570 rwhp on E85 using a single 340 pump and was still maintaining fuel pressure at this level. Didn't think this would be possible on E85 since it needs 25-30% more fuel, but we did it and would've turned boost up more but clutch would not have been able to hang.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
    • Literally looks like direct port nitrous haha
×
×
  • Create New...