Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

looking at upgrading my injecotrs and fuel pump b4 i get a tune and needing advice

in tank vs external which better? walbro vs bosch? looking for something that will fit in relatively easy without paying 3+ times the price to get a nismo one that will drop straight in.

what size injectors needed?

looking for 300awkw max but prob for better fuel ecomony and reliability will go closer to 250awkw.

300rwkw you might find will be OK with stock injectors. Some cars are, some aren't so as Jez said - just go with a fuel pump for now mate.

If you need them, get them. Otherwise you can tune to 280/290rwkw and save $700-$900 (purchase/fitting).

What turbos do you have? 300rwkw means non factory so you could probably make more if you did get injectors, you will need AFM's though.

not really keen on spending $600 on nismo pump which is more than 3 times price of bosch or walbro pump just coz its bit easier to install. from sounds of it unless i find a cheap set of injectors stick to what i got coz from what i can see like $600 sard 550cc injectors though the price to go to 1000cc injectors isnt much more.

so for fuel pump in tank vs external which better? walbro vs bosch? looking for something that will fit in relatively easy without paying 3+ times the price to get a nismo one that will drop straight in.

i got the N1 turbos, i tired searching several different topics nothing seems to come up but i get this alot guessing im just not using right words.

I have tuned a gtr 312kw stock injectors but a fuel reg.

250 kw is nothing for stock inj. Just get a fuel pump

What base pressure and afr bro?

But yea 250awkw is poossible with stock 444cc inj, even a little more......I'm doin roughly that now with them at 88% duty with 11.0 afrs,,,,and i'm sure your tuner wouldnt go that rich

Oooh ....an a walbro pump too....not in a gtr tho so i'm not sure about fitment

What base pressure and afr bro?

But yea 250awkw is poossible with stock 444cc inj, even a little more......I'm doin roughly that now with them at 88% duty with 11.0 afrs,,,,and i'm sure your tuner wouldnt go that rich

Oooh ....an a walbro pump too....not in a gtr tho so i'm not sure about fitment

I tuned it at 11.5 afr. I never set the base pressure myself so i can answer that one sorry.

Inj hit 105%

There is a new fuel pump, just released not long ago. It flows nearly 350lph at 45psi. 290lph @60psi all at 13.5v.

Basically it flows just over 30% more then a failbro 255, denso etc.@ 13.5v. As another comparison

the walbro and denso need 16.5v to run close to this pump at its 13.5v flow on 0.7 SG.

Nismo quotes 276lph @ 3 Bar pressure, no SG or voltage quoted

The only downside I can see is that it will probably surge on under 1/4 tank on a bnr32- more of a design prob of the

tank then pump.

Its a 100% drop in, in tank pump and the best part is, cost is about $250

I will be getting mine in a few days and post findings

What brand? Anyone needing more than 255LPH is going to be aiming for serious power and won't care about a couple hundred $$ saved, and will probably NOT skimp on it given how much was spent on the engine.

But, see how it goes :)

There is a new fuel pump, just released not long ago. It flows nearly 350lph at 45psi. 290lph @60psi all at 13.5v.

Basically it flows just over 30% more then a failbro 255, denso etc.@ 13.5v. As another comparison

the walbro and denso need 16.5v to run close to this pump at its 13.5v flow on 0.7 SG.

Nismo quotes 276lph @ 3 Bar pressure, no SG or voltage quoted

The only downside I can see is that it will probably surge on under 1/4 tank on a bnr32- more of a design prob of the

tank then pump.

Its a 100% drop in, in tank pump and the best part is, cost is about $250

I will be getting mine in a few days and post findings

would like more info on this pump and also you findings

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...