Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There is only one way to go.

Bosch EV14's (Injector Dynamics, X-Spurt) and then pick your flavour. 1000cc,1400cc or 2000cc. None have a downside in the application that you are going to use them. They work fine with PULP/Ethanol fuels. They still work fine a low RPM/Idle. The 1400/2000 will have more headroom than you will (probably) ever need.

Also the new 1400's are stainless and scottynm35 says that's better for running ethanol fuels.

Just pick one and go with it :)

There is one other downside to the bigger injectors.

Transitions from one load cell to the next when the delivered fuel amount is interpolated produce a more inaccurate fuel delivery. I see this in the low end of the RPM scale with my setup especially.

My engine idles at 2.07ms with a 14.7 afr. At cruise in 6th gear/60km/h the injector pulse is only around 2.34ms, again at 14.7 afr. When the ecu load point moves from a single cell across 4 and the MS value is interpolated, I inevitably end up with a value into the low 14's when running open loop.

Closed loop mode resolves this a little but its far from perfect, and granted my old Power FC djetro is the other issue due to its low load point cell resolution.

That is more of a djetro/MAP sensor thing with ITB's as you are going from vac to zero vac just by opening the throttle a touch more.

You can rescale and use tps voltage enrichment to help but you will always have to compromise a bit. The normal power fc doesn't have this issue.

End of the day if your accelerating you want that extra fuel, the timing is more important and is more compromised. I.e if your accelerating though a low rpm, zero vac though the gears with no knock, but come to a typical suburban 90 deg corner, 2nd gear that is up hill it will knock. This rpm zone is also usually 2k at 60klm in top gear and wont knock.

If I were you I would be aiming for high 13's on that enrichment, but you don't have a 2.6 anymore so that extra bit of power will mean fk all to you so you will just be wasting fuel...

If you want to get really anal, you can also drop your base fuel pressure a bit to gain more control at the lower duty cycles, obviously if you have the head room for it. If your at 90% it wont make fk all different to top end running it at 95% max if your aim is to gain more control down low. Its not like any of you are stupid enough to run a wide band close loop while on boost, and even if you did your trim wont come into effect quick enough for a boost spike/overboost anyways. NB if you have 2000cc and only using 45% max inj duty you wont be able to lower base pressure much, you will dribble fuel.

Edited by sucram

I didnt mean interpolation while under acceleration, I mean when maintaining a steady speed and the load cell is interpolated from multiple cells.

Im running 45psi base pressure on the ID1000's. Duty cycle at idle < 2 percent on the MFD.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...