Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys just a quick question I just acquired an Apexi SAFC, now I know this unit is not as good as a nistune or a PFC but it was given to me buy a mate so it was free. My car is fairly stock , it has a front mount cooler, 3.5 inch turbo back exhaust, walbro fuel pump, HKS Pod and a turbo smart boost controller. My car will stay like this for quite some time so I dont see the need in getting a nistune or Power FC at the moment. Im about to start looking for someone that can tune this for me but first i have a couple of question for you guys.

1. My car hits fuel cut sometimes as my boost is set at 12 PSI, Can the SAFC eliminate this problem?

2. For a car as stock as mine does it realy need a tune? or am I wasting my coin

3. I have been told that i should get better fuel economy from my car after a tune do you agree? (I dont care if the car gets better fuel economy or not, if i did care i would of brought another car)

4. If you have an SAFC who did you get to tune it

Any help or extra input would be great guys thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/
Share on other sites

1. My car hits fuel cut sometimes as my boost is set at 12 PSI, Can the SAFC eliminate this problem?

2. For a car as stock as mine does it realy need a tune? or am I wasting my coin

3. I have been told that i should get better fuel economy from my car after a tune do you agree? (I dont care if the car gets better fuel economy or not, if i did care i would of brought another car)

4. If you have an SAFC who did you get to tune it

My car has similar mods to yours & this is from my experience:

1) Most likely, I'm runing 10PSI through my bleed valve with a SAFC 2 & I've no R&R problem when I go WOT at over 6k rpm

2) If you have R&R (& you saying you have) it is worth a shot trying to fix it with SAFC, other opinion is to lower boost & see if it fixes the R&R.

3) Most likely won't be noticable (I didn't notice much).

4) I got mine tuned at All Star Garage (a import shop in WA), SAFC is a pretty basic signal bender unit & hence any 1/2 decent shop should have no problem.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5787116
Share on other sites

If you're not planning any mods SAFC will be better than nothing ( I had one once). Should fix your R&R but get it tuned on a dyno just to satisfy yourself that everything is safe (shouldn't cost too much). And you are unlikely to get better economy - if it goes better you will go faster!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5787497
Share on other sites

Get a wideband with a serial output that you can map onto your PC, let your tuning adventures begin :)

AEM UEGO is a good neat unit you could get for cheap or Innovate LC-1 Gauge Kit since the USD vs AUD is fantastic!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5788312
Share on other sites

Get a wideband with a serial output that you can map onto your PC, let your tuning adventures begin :)

AEM UEGO is a good neat unit you could get for cheap or Innovate LC-1 Gauge Kit since the USD vs AUD is fantastic!

Hey johnnilicte are you sugesting to give it a go myself? Tuning is one job i always thought should be left to the pros?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5788403
Share on other sites

Hey johnnilicte are you sugesting to give it a go myself? Tuning is one job i always thought should be left to the pros?

that's a myth, I've street tuned my friend's EVO 8, CA18DET Pulsar ET and my previous R33 none of them kapow'ed yet and still going strong.

It's about knowing what to do, doesn't necessarily mean you need a pro. When I didn't know anything about tuning, I paid a tuner to tune my car. He made a dog's breakfast out of my tune. I had WOT A/Fs at 12.7:1 with about 14 degrees of timing dialed into row 15 and even more timing dialed into rows 16. Nevertheless, it was then I went "fk this" I'm going to learn how to do it myself.

He didn't even touch my Injector latency settings or anything either, he said "I always leave them at 100%"... I took his word for it.

Just start reading up, but a SAFC is a great way to learn, as it only deals with the A/F.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5788936
Share on other sites

whilist i agree just be careful with the SAFC and understand what it is doing and how it affects the ECU

be sure to note it BENDS the AFM signal to the std computer and it uses this way to make the car rich/lean and more/less timing

so if you can get your head around that (not hard) then its easy

the computer looks at the airflow meter signal and throttle body sensor to work out how hard the engine is working

based off "how hard" the engine is working it then computes ignition timing and air/fuel injection control (ie what ratio to aim for)

the SAFC sits between your airflow meter and the std computer to "BEND" or "Fake" the signal

the the SAFC will say the engine is under less load that it really is, which in turn makes the computer throw in less fuel and/or more timing

so you get a leaner ratio (more power) but you also get more timing (not always good). so its juggling act, balancing both.

on a system like a powerfc or nistune you can edit both maps seperately - the ignition and fuel injection maps

and say whatever XYZ degrees at XYZ RPM and XYZ AF/R at XYZ rpm etc etc

on the SAFC you simply say bend + or - XXX increments from 2800rpm to 3200rpm

so say -2 at 2800rpm to 3200rpm

then -4 at 3200rpm to 3600rpm

so you basically juggle the beinding to get the best comprimise

back in the day, everyone had SAFC'S and got good reuslts and not many hand standalones

a lot has changed since then and most just go straight for stand alone ECUS like nistune or powerfc

but the SAFC is cheap, easy to setup yourself and away you go, good results for fraction of the price (just remember the comprimise/juggle operability)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5788991
Share on other sites

thanks for the input guys, I have never given tuning a thought but maybe ill have a look around on the net and do some reading and see what i can learn. Mayuri Krab I know the tuning for an safc is very cheap the most i got quoted was 250 but at the moment no one has touched my car everything that has been done to it has been done buy me or mates and in our garages id like to keep it that way at least i can say i built this (or blew it up) and not that i payed for this!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5789558
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...