Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is there anything we can do to help reduce the number of poor police officers?

I'm not complaining about being pulled up by every RBT or anything... I'm more talking about the police like the highway patrol today who went out looking for modified cars to defect; then showed no mercy.

I feel like they need to be told that they're giving the other top cops a very VERY poor name... People giving good officers crap because they got pulled over by a bad one the other week... I just want it to stop.

you can't blame police for people having modified cars. sure they might have been showing no mercy, but if people didn't have illegal mods then they wouldn't have anything to defect. it's a bit of a chicken vs egg situation. as long as people are doing illegal mods to their cars then there will be police out to book them for it. also, don't forget that the cops usually have targets set by some pencil pusher that they have to meet or they get disciplined.

If your car is legal and roadworthy they cannot defect you, if you modify your car and dont get it engineered you will be defected, too many cars out there that are dangerous, over powered under braked, panels held on but cable ties and bald tyres, if you dont want a defect then get your car sorted.

And dont cry poor, the $1000 dollars it costs to get your car safe and legal isnt alot of money, a set of tyres cost more.

A better question would be "what can we do to stop dangerous drivers and cars" the less dangerous cars and drivers on the road the better.

I'm keen to know all your opinions on this one...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=242YqeItGnE&feature=player_embedded

The URL contained a malformed video ID.

LOL, linky is broken me thinks

If your car is legal and roadworthy they cannot defect you,

I disagree. They can defect you, it just wont stand up to scrutiny. Doesn't mean you wont be inconvenienced by the process of clearing it.

Remember, cops are not automotive engineers, and they may not know the details of the legislation well. If they have a hunch you have something defectable, there's no reason for them not to write it up as there's no real downside for them. So its best not to be a jerk when you get pulled over :)

I know what your talking about. You want to be able to modify your car

and enjoy it without fear of an officer giving you a fine and demerit points.

Like the others have said, you need an engineers certificate, or move to Dubai.

I'm keen to know all your opinions on this one...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=242YqeItGnE

Whether the cops targeted them or not guy got what he deserved. Saw the cop, cop hit the lights and still runs.

Not too impressed with the police driving the way they did either but end of the day they were enforcing the law.

As for swearing woopty doo. I would be the same. Cops just after some excitement and they got it.

1. cops on patrol

2. bike mucking around

3.bike doing 87kph in a 50kph zone?

4.does the runner

5.cops have blues and twos on

6.bike jumps gutter

7.still doing runner in a 50kph zone

8. cops pushing through lights as do ambos and fire brigade

What I saw was a video of the cops at work chasing a bike that done the runner, there was some script in the video trying to make excuses about the cops swearing but not commenting on the illegal and dangerous antics of the bike.

At one point they said they were not breaking the law, except for the noise pollution laws, WTF, LOL.

My bike is noisy as I find it is safer that way but I dont gas it up and down the road and then do a runner if I get caught.

Do the crime and do the time I say, but then its easier to blame others for our own mistakes it seams.

The bike doing the runner has risked the lives of himself, anyone the bike hit if he crashed, and the cops and other punters in the way.

I disagree. They can defect you, it just wont stand up to scrutiny. Doesn't mean you wont be inconvenienced by the process of clearing it.

Remember, cops are not automotive engineers, and they may not know the details of the legislation well. If they have a hunch you have something defectable, there's no reason for them not to write it up as there's no real downside for them. So its best not to be a jerk when you get pulled over :)

Ive been pulled over and when they start looking around I pull out the engineers cert and say yes that mod is legal and would they like to have a look at the cert, which they do, they check my sticker make a radio call and then I go on my merry way, easy as.

I like the idea of the police getting crap cars of the street, make me feel a bit safer, all they need to do now is get rid of the crap drivers.

Not that i am proud of it- far from it actually, but i got chased on my r6 when i was 19. The cop said he clocked me @ 220 just before i stopped, and i also went through 2 red lights on the highway (one with a paddy wagon holding back traffic) and he still got close enough to get my number plate, so i stopped. Was a 7km chase, and obviously he broke all sorts of laws chasing me down. Because of this, he backed off the charges to orange lights and 180km/h. The thing is, as a young idiot motorcycle rider i thought i couldnt be caught and ran anytime they tried to stop me. If he hadnt done what he did i would have killed myself, and most probably others. Also, if you are going to be a f**kwitt like i was, then you CANNOT complain about others endangering the public. Its not like i could stand up in front of the judge and speak of the wrongdoing the police did.

Also i tend to agree with what the others have said about getting an engineers certificate. Most police i have encountered are really great blokes if you are not a dick or a smartass (including the one who chased me on my bike) and if you dont have illegal mods, in MOST cases you dont need to worry. Obviously their are exceptions, but the majority are just doing their jobs trying to protect the public from idiots with shitty mods, driving like wankers. (Also i should point out, the road the police chased me on was a highway, only two sets of traffic lights, one had a paddy wagon holding back traffic and in the whole 7km chase we only overtook 14 cars. It COULD be perceived that what the cop did wasnt all that dangerous.)

The one thing i disagree with cops doing is holding back and hoping for you to do stupid shit. The cops should have pulled them over immediately eg for putting hands out and legs and driving dangerously. Cops secretly want you to run so they can chase and have a reason to treat the roads like a go kart track all for the reason of "chasing down".

Stupid bike rider =P, always check behind for a commodore or falcon before having a lil fun on the roads....

Abuse of power by the law, they had his plates.

So if your car was stolen and the cops had the plates its OK for them to call of the chase so the theives can strip your car in the comfort of a garage somewhere ?

So if your car was stolen and the cops had the plates its OK for them to call of the chase so the theives can strip your car in the comfort of a garage somewhere ?

And if they just go by plates, they wont get the drunks, people who have just committed a crime (may have evidence of the crime on them), etc. Doing a runner is very sus - the police have to chase, otherwise any crim knows all he has to do is run and he's only going to get done for running, rather than something more serious.

Running the plates means nothing, Ive had 2 cars and 1 bike stolen, it was hours before I knew they had been pinched and I was able to report the theft.

Actually when they pinched my bike I was away with work and it was a month before I got home and opened up my garage to find it gone.

1. cops on patrol

2. bike mucking around

3.bike doing 87kph in a 50kph zone?

4.does the runner

5.cops have blues and twos on

6.bike jumps gutter

7.still doing runner in a 50kph zone

8. cops pushing through lights as do ambos and fire brigade

What I saw was a video of the cops at work chasing a bike that done the runner, there was some script in the video trying to make excuses about the cops swearing but not commenting on the illegal and dangerous antics of the bike.

At one point they said they were not breaking the law, except for the noise pollution laws, WTF, LOL.

My bike is noisy as I find it is safer that way but I dont gas it up and down the road and then do a runner if I get caught.

Do the crime and do the time I say, but then its easier to blame others for our own mistakes it seams.

The bike doing the runner has risked the lives of himself, anyone the bike hit if he crashed, and the cops and other punters in the way.

I echo this sentiment exactly. And who cares about swearing? I curse like a sailor at work, why is it different for police when they're in the privacy of their HWP car?

So if your car was stolen and the cops had the plates its OK for them to call of the chase so the theives can strip your car in the comfort of a garage somewhere ?

In this situation they were stalking these guys and waiting for them to slip up, so I dont think that was very neccessary to drive on the wrong side of the road and push traffic into a red light on a busy intersection just over someone who dicking around on a bike.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...