Jump to content
SAU Community

Beginners Camera Choice


Mangune
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey guys thought id drop on by as i dont know much about the whole photo scene. Always keeping my eye on thread and thinking there some really nice pictures in here. I think we are catching the bug (yes the missus aswell lol).

So im looking for some advice on a dslr to begin on. Just looking for something basic to do some cars and scenery not much moving pictures really. I was browsing around and i notice the nikon D3100 and the canon D1000 are roughly the price rangish where i think it would be a good place to start. Cannon is coming with a twin lens kit an the nikon a single (more mp and a little more in price not much though)

So im thinking between one of these two to start on but other comments would be very handy :)

Also as for a program is there anything else on the market other than photoshop? or is it a case of you just cant go past photoshop.

Cheers damien

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think for entry photography that is fine but the issue you face is the want to upgrade so quickly and losing out.

I bought Canon 500D early this yr (Purely for HOBBY USE) not knowing if I would enjoy it that much or not and have ended up loving it.

This has now got me to buying lenses, filters, hoods, tripod, more memory cards, batteries, battery grip, tripod, Photoshop.

All these other essentials that are needed (I believe) when you get into photography add the costs up quickly!! (especially if on a budget)

Even if you could purchase a second hand 500D - 550D with a few bits and pieces you can get a superior camera for the same price as a D1000 with kit lenses.

I'm looking at going to 60D as mrs wants DSLR so she can take mine.

This is my brief view on it and how I got into photography but I'm sure some of the people in the industry will have some great advice especially with Nikon as I will not bother commenting on them. Sure they are good but would not have a clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going local for sure... I have bought everything local except my camera bag. I want the Full warranty just in case but also have it insured. You won't find out if it's worth the saving of a few hundred until you own it for as long as the warranty would of lasted. Few hundred more gives me peace of mind and local shops staying in business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're looking at a Canon, the 1100D has just been brought in to replace the 1000D, and the 600D has been brought in as a slight step up from the 550D.

Whichever way you go, buy a camera body you'll be willing to keep for a while, then upgrade lenses as and when your budget/needs require them. Your first new lens should be a "Nifty Fifty," which is a cheap (but excellent value) prime (i.e. non-zooming) lens.

Once you make your purchase, use the camera as often as possible, and experiment with different settings to see how they affect your shots.

As for editing programs, Photoshop Elements should be fine and it's currently up to version 9. There are plenty of free programs too, but I couldn't tell you what's good to use.

Oh, and some essentials you should account for in your budget:

- a decent, sturdy tripod (don't get anything too cheap or it will almost be pointless);

- UV filters for ALL your lenses;

- a spare battery;

- extra memory cards; and

- a decent bag that will fit everything in with some room for new stuff later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice job on the 1100D, its a nice place to start with. One of my friends had the 1000D, his only problem with it was that he quickly found that he couldnt get the kind of quality that he was looking for so he upgraded to the 550D. I would have recommended going for the 600D, but each to their own.:happy: Try investing in some decent glass as you will be able to use it long after you replace your current camera body. All the best and have fun, photography is an awesome hobby :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decent glass also does not depreciate very much. I'm talking L lenses.

Post up if you have any dramas with your camera that you don't understand too ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick question, this canon 50mm here.

I can get this for $98 brand new from a store with 1 year warrenty. good value or not?

Yes this is "Nifty Fifty" that GoldZilla was refering to in his post above, I have this lens and it has been on my camera more than any of my other lenses. It is a great lense for the costs, you have seen the review of it on 'The-Digital-Picture' so you know what you are paying for. It is a great place to start off. So I guess I am saying... BUY IT. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah well I though for $98 its either good value or really really crap. but I think its just a good find for the price, I had a good look at the review and I was pretty happy with what I was looking at.

Just always like to ask for peoples opinions still :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yer that's prob the only thing I was goin to ask I got 2 is lens with the kit 18-55 I think an 55-250

So it's worth getting this nifty fifty?

Also do you all shot in raw only or L and Raw?

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nikon 3100 is a great camera but the lens it comes with is pretty average not sure on the Canon but like most people have said you would be wise to also buy a 50mm lens like this: http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/5014af.htm

Then you will be able to take some great shots... I think you will find once you put the 50mm on you won't bother with the lenses that came with the camera at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick question, this canon 50mm here.

I can get this for $98 brand new from a store with 1 year warrenty. good value or not?

Do it, John! It's a great value lens and was one of the first lenses I bought beyond the kit lens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yer that's prob the only thing I was goin to ask I got 2 is lens with the kit 18-55 I think an 55-250

So it's worth getting this nifty fifty?

Also do you all shot in raw only or L and Raw?

Cheers

Yep, as stated by bluey already, it is definitely a worthwhile purchase - you'll not only learn to "focus with your feet," but you'll also think more about composition and get a better understanding of how aperture can affect your shots.

Personally, I shoot only in RAW - the file sizes are larger, but the ability to manipulate the image in PP is much greater, and it won't lose quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, at the moment im shooting in both, due to i heard that Raw has a better PS abilty.

I might have a to head out and get myself a 50mm :) Does everyone buy stuff from online or do they hunt good deals in the shops?

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...