Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So finished rebuilding the engine , got Arias custom made pistons in it for neo engine ! when it was freshly finished it showed 120, 120, 130, 125, 130, 120 psi in all six cilinders . drove about 700km and now in all 6 cilinders is 120psi, same in all!! i have putted tomei poncams as well ! gasket is standard size standard has 9:1 as far as i know what number i have now? is it too low?

my friend owns RB26 he did same (forged it) and his car shows 145psi in all six?

so am i ok or in trouble? :))))

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/369488-rb25-det-neo-just-forged-it/
Share on other sites

Normally bigger cams will drop your compression when you do a test, in comparison to standard. But not that much, especially with poncams. Did you build it yourself or an engine builder do it for you?

You did have the throttle fully open when you did the test?

my healthy neo with pon cams reads 100 psi all round lol

This is why I was persistently asking you about this.

110psi across all six here, with a new engine with poncams which I thought was pretty low but it runs great.

Using the same tester on an a standard RB26 which had 165-170psi across all cylinders then a built RB26 with big cams; 160-165psi :mellow:

Edited by aleks

Normally bigger cams will drop your compression when you do a test, in comparison to standard. But not that much, especially with poncams. Did you build it yourself or an engine builder do it for you?

You did have the throttle fully open when you did the test?

didn't touch the throttle and didn't cut the fuel :) lol i'll try to do that way :)

Glad that here is people running that low CR with no problems:)

thx

you sure?? cause mine is as high as 170 and 175,

100psi is low, that must be pretty unresponsive on low revs??

I really doubt its compression is actually almost half of yours, if it did it would drive like absolute shit, either completely wrong pistons or blown rings. The reality is it is probably one motor was cold/hot, different tester, different rpm, different cams etc.

My old rb20 measured 90-95 on all 6, made 155kw on 11psi stock turbo and blew no smoke, all that matters is it is close.

Edited by Rolls

thats just it.. too many variations to be able to compare one to another.. the main thing is all cyns are the same, and comp testers fall into the same bucket as dynos.. just a tool.

well i wouldnt be happy them just all being the same, id want to know its perfect after spending all that money rebuilding an engine,

a compression guage shouldnt be more than 5% different to the next , thats like saying a tyre guage says its 40psi but another is saying 30psi?

must be quite a big gap with forged pistons when there cold and the cam must be quite long duration to justify a 70psi drop after a rebuild, but just my opinion,

but if your happy with it then great..

thats like saying a tyre guage says its 40psi but another is saying 30psi?

actually happens a lot more than you'd think and more than 10psi a lot of the time, especially at servo gauges

also dont forget, static compression is different to dynamic compression, way too many variables to go comparing readings. as said aslong as they're all within 5-10psi and its not using more oil than fuel its fine.

Edited by JonnoHR31

well i wouldnt be happy them just all being the same, id want to know its perfect after spending all that money rebuilding an engine,

a compression guage shouldnt be more than 5% different to the next , thats like saying a tyre guage says its 40psi but another is saying 30psi?

It isn't just the compression gauge though, it is cam timing, actual compression ratio due to pistons, if they are forged, if they rings aren't yet bedded in, if you have a big cam, all of these will change the compression.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...