Jump to content
SAU Community

  

72 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I have found that if I do put v-power in the Gtr feels a little docile, but I have also since found that the exhaust cam was buggered and timing was all over the place.. The clincher for me was a mates 180, he is running about 280rwkw on standard cams and valve train, and is one of those freaky natural mechanics who just gets cars, he has found that v-power tends to foul plugs more than anything else, there were 1 or 2 other issues, but I am not sure what they were, so I won't make claims. It is always ultimate for me

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As has already been said... 98 is 98 and the most likely reason a car loses perfomance on a 98 fuel is it's probably stale from sitting in the servo's tanks for longer than usual simply because there isn't enough people using it quick enough. If you buy your 98 fuel from a servo that would sell a lot of it you can bet it will be as good as any other servo's 98 fuel. It is hard to know which servos go through enough 98 to have to keep topping up with fresh fuel but thats where it's hit and miss.

ahh, there's no crap to suck in, there's a sock that covers the fuel pump no? and either way, the pump is at the bottom, so crap surrounds the pump whether at high or low levels.

but running the fuel level low might introduce bubbles into the system

Topic has been discussed a billion times.

I would say the best fuel would be any 98RON fuel from a Caltex/BP/Shell/Mobil petrol station that is usually very busy; which means fuel supply has a high turnover rate.

Can't remember where i read it, but someone mentioned BP and another brand of petrol comes from the same refinery.

Edited by sloutch

you will be sucking crap from the bottom of the tank no matter what, it's just that when the fuel level is lower the conecntration of crap is higher, that said, if you run your tank low a few times in a row then you will have sucked up a fair bit of crap and most of it will end up in your fuel filter, so it won't be so much of an issue down the track. that said, everytime you fill up you would also stir up any crap at the bottom of the tank and to a lesser extent this also happens when you drive over rough roads.

I always get Caltex 98, but only because it's the most convenient for me to get to.

To be honest... I've tried 95 and 98 octane from several different retailers and not really noticed any difference in performance.

george, you do realise you a wasting more fuel driving around?

Of course, but being a cheap arse Asian every time if I do go to a further away station I did the math using my car's average fuel consumption (12.5 - 13.5L/100km), the extra fuel it will use going the extra kms to that station compared to the closet one, the estimate amount of fuel I'll be putting in and the extra cost minus the difference in fuel price between the stations & overall if there is still a net saving I will go, otherwise I will go to my usual Caltex near Osborne Park.

BTW, I not sure if the other states have it, but the WA government have fuel watch website where it lists all the fuel prices for today & tomorrow so I use that to get all the prices of the main servos in my area before I do the math.

the missu and I kept having an argument over fuel in her honda, i kept telling her to put bp ultimate in it but she doesnt want to listen and keeps putting 91 or e10 cause its cheap and aparently all the same, so i made her do a little test..

Filled it up run till the light come on..

BP ultimate 550 kms on i think was 55l..

E10 did about 450km for the 55l...

With the price difference in the 2 km per dollar was almost identical didnt bother testing 91 yet. Cause i dont use it but i will do that test next for curiosity sake but i expect to get around 500km

But it just goes to show there is no reason not to run premium fuels as the extra mileage makes up for the extra cost and buying a fuel on price alone is naive..

i actually prefer to run e10 in her car for its cleansing properties but if I take a long trip I use Ultimate for the extra mileage...but it really doesnt matter..I would use BP all the time cause it definately makes more power but that means argueing with a woman so I settle for e10, i dont drive the thing so who cares

Of course these tests have nothing to do with power..for power In my 33 I believe BP ultimate is the best but I do like Vpower as well it feels snappier and more livelyy under throttle though probably not as fast as BP..

the missu and I kept having an argument over fuel in her honda, i kept telling her to put bp ultimate in it but she doesnt want to listen and keeps putting 91 or e10 cause its cheap and aparently all the same, so i made her do a little test..

Filled it up run till the light come on..

BP ultimate 550 kms on i think was 55l..

E10 did about 450km for the 55l...

With the price difference in the 2 km per dollar was almost identical didnt bother testing 91 yet. Cause i dont use it but i will do that test next for curiosity sake but i expect to get around 500km

But it just goes to show there is no reason not to run premium fuels as the extra mileage makes up for the extra cost and buying a fuel on price alone is naive..

i actually prefer to run e10 in her car for its cleansing properties but if I take a long trip I use Ultimate for the extra mileage...but it really doesnt matter..I would use BP all the time cause it definately makes more power but that means argueing with a woman so I settle for e10, i dont drive the thing so who cares

Of course these tests have nothing to do with power..for power In my 33 I believe BP ultimate is the best but I do like Vpower as well it feels snappier and more livelyy under throttle though probably not as fast as BP..

i did a similar test in the missus SSS. this wasn't just 1 tank either. i ran each different fuel for a few months so that i could rule out any possibly differences from driving style, terrain or trip type, because basing your results over 1 tank of fuel isn't a good idea and could see you wasting a lot of money for no reason in the long run. this was based on 2 different 98 fuels, 2 different e10's and 1 91 octane. the difference between them all was much less than 1L/100kms. i've done similar tests in other cars i've owned, but generally only for a few tanks rather than for a few months, and always had similar results. with the price difference being about 10% and the fuel savings generally being below 5%, it isn't worth it in my situation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...