Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Goodafternoon fellas',

Im having some issues with my car, before i go on, i would just like to say that my car standard apart from:

- Front pipes

- Hi-flo metal cat

- Apexi cat back

- K&N Pods apexi intake

Now my problem is, my car isn't lacking power, but it just chews fuel and i mean $50 petrol and im lucky to get 200kms if i drive like a granny possibly 250km. Now something can't be right? Is this just a normal occurance with GTRs? I've read on here that people get way better fuel economy. The car is due for service in another 500kms so looking at changing sparkies, oil, oil filter ect.

I've done my search, but nothing really hits the nail on head with my case. When the car got here, it was 100% stock except for the Apexi catback, Stock airbox front pipes ect ect.

Really would appreciate any feedback advice, and or whatever. Seeing as the car is my daily for the meanwhile its smashing me sick in the wallet.

Thanks guys.

If the O2s are the same ones from factory I would change them, then give the AFMs a good clean too. While you're at it, tighten up all your FMIC piping hoses, etc.

im getting 15l/100 on mine. have changed the o2 sensors as well. i do alot of around town driving though

Thats decent, mine works out to be 16.5l/100. Thats mixed driving; freeway and in and out of the suburbs.

$50 of 98 isnt that much these days, 200km from that isnt that bad.

i managed to get under 300km out of a full tank once.

get a new ecu for it (nistune, pfc etc...) and youll be able to tune it for much better economy

has the fuel economy gotten worse ? or have u just got the car and expected it to be better?

gtr's CHEW the fuel dude

Hrmm i dunno bro, I mean i've owned that car since last year August. I never remembered it being this bad. I mean it was thirsty but now its just stupid. It is kinda standard after all, expected it would be better :S?

I guess what im trying to ask is there anything i can do to, increase fuel economy?

$50 of 98 isnt that much these days, 200km from that isnt that bad.

i managed to get under 300km out of a full tank once.

Lol, but is it normal to say go from 4th to 2nd to say overtake then stretch the gear a bit, and once your in 5th cruisng you look at the petrol needle and see that it has drop? haha

plenty of factors to consider when looking at fuel economy. generally only use others economy as a rough guide as there are so many variables. here's a list of things to consider:

- do you let the car idle to warm up? (an idling car will use a few litres per hour)

- how long does the car take to warm up? (if more than a few mins when driving then get a new thermostat)

- how much time do you spend sitting in traffic?

- how hilly is it where you drive?

- how often do you go into positive boost?

- how much throttle do you apply at low rpm? (fuel economy has little to do with revs but throttle percentage. you can rev it out to 5000rpm using light throttle and get better economy than someone who only revs to 3000rpm but floors it to get there)

you can check a few things to help get better economy. o2 sensors are a good place to start. also worth jacking the car up and spinning the wheels to make sure you don't have a sticking brake caliper (or hand brake) or damaged wheel bearing.

plenty of factors to consider when looking at fuel economy. generally only use others economy as a rough guide as there are so many variables. here's a list of things to consider:

- do you let the car idle to warm up? a few mins is enough (an idling car will use a few litres per hour)

- how long does the car take to warm up? warm up meaning halfway mark?

- how much time do you spend sitting in traffic? Not alot

- how hilly is it where you drive? Not at all

- how often do you go into positive boost? A fair bit, just normal driving

- how much throttle do you apply at low rpm? (fuel economy has little to do with revs but throttle percentage. you can rev it out to 5000rpm using light throttle and get better economy than someone who only revs to 3000rpm but floors it to get there) Quite alot, i normally am to lazy to drop a gear sometimes, so i just give it more gas

you can check a few things to help get better economy. o2 sensors are a good place to start. also worth jacking the car up and spinning the wheels to make sure you don't have a sticking brake caliper (or hand brake) or damaged wheel bearing.

I'll be getting the o2 sensors and checking all these things in the coming weeks. Thanks mayn.

Also, I would see if the engine's thermostat is working. It might be seized and always opened. The ECU will dump in more fuel when the water temp is low, does your car's water take forever to warm up?

As Marc said, driving habits are the first thing to address if you want to see better fuel usage.

As for oxygen sensors, again, they do absolutely NOTHING if your driving style is heavy.

Do some Googling re-oxygen sensors and you'll see there are many factors that must be satisfied before the ecu will even go to closed loop.

For the majority of time you're running in open loop (no feedback) and the oxygen sensor input is ignored.

Biggest joke out, replacing oxygen sensors and then driving pedal to the metal.

As your problem is somewhat recent, my first look would be coolant temp sensor.

But don't just replace stuff willy-nilly, pay the $$$ to get everything professionally checked.

Also, I would see if the engine's thermostat is working. It might be seized and always opened. The ECU will dump in more fuel when the water temp is low, does your car's water take forever to warm up?

Come to think of it not really, about 4-5 minutes before the needle moves. This is in 5 degree weather (Melbourne)

I'll be getting the o2 sensors and checking all these things in the coming weeks. Thanks mayn.

boost is the enemy of fuel economy. by the sounds of it o2 sensors won't help your economy much as your driving style is causing your poor economy.

I personally get about 400-450ks to a tank on low boost (14psi/340rwhp) in a mix between driving 80ks a day a least with mixture of country back roads and highway driving nice and casually... but If i bump the boost up to highboost(21.5psi/467rwhp) it will chew very badly about 200-250 per tank.

So about 12.5/100 on a very very good run still not as thirsty as my mates Ve ss his worse fuel consumption was about 23/100 stock :S

I have changed the following

Power-Fc

2860-5s

Tomei Dumps

100 Cell Cat

Nismo 600cc Injectors

Nismo Fuel Reg

Nismo Fuel Pump

HKS Hard piping for intercooler

Cooling-pro Front Mount.

I am still running the stock AFMs but clean them regularly!

Clean your AFMs and Airfilter, Change your plugs etc.... My question is have you recently changed the oil brand/weight lately? I only ask as I changed my oil from 0-40w Castrol edge to Royal Purple 3-35w and I noticed a mass drop in response and reliability... so I changed the oil out a week later I also could hear the oil slapping on cold start.

Edited by EAT26

I personally get about 400-450ks to a tank on low boost (14psi/340rwhp) in a mix between driving 80ks a day a least with mixture of country back roads and highway driving nice and casually... but If i bump the boost up to highboost(21.5psi/467rwhp) it will chew very badly about 200-250 per tank.

So about 12.5/100 on a very very good run still not as thirsty as my mates Ve ss his worse fuel consumption was about 23/100 stock :S

I have changed the following

Power-Fc

2860-5s

Tomei Dumps

100 Cell Cat

Nismo 600cc Injectors

Nismo Fuel Reg

Nismo Fuel Pump

HKS Hard piping for intercooler

Cooling-pro Front Mount.

I am still running the stock AFMs but clean them regularly!

Clean your AFMs and Airfilter, Change your plugs etc.... My question is have you recently changed the oil brand/weight lately? I only ask as I changed my oil from 0-40w Castrol edge to Royal Purple 3-35w and I noticed a mass drop in response and reliability... so I changed the oil out a week later I also could hear the oil slapping on cold start.

Its going for a service soon, so hoping to change oils. Ive been using Motul 8100 5-40w fully sen since i started driving it on the road. So maybe a different oil could help? What do you guys reccomend?

Im also going to buy an ECUtalk cable of ebay, sus out shit some more, get a better idea of whats happening.

BTW, thats great fuel economy dude

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...