Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On a separate note, I was told by the precision guys that a .82 T3 open housing flows the same as between a .58 and .68 T4 open housing. Can anyone confirm? Sounds quite dubious.

That does sound VERY dubious. Why would the fact it has a T3 or T4 flange change the flow unless the T3 flange was actually limiting flow??

Whereas a twin scroll T4 turbo for example has 2 smaller separate paths for air to flow all the way through the turbo, not just at the flange.

My understanding is the flange just has to be big enough so as not to be a restriction in comparison to the flow the turbo can deliver.

I dont know of any rb30s with precision turbos. What do 2JZ supras with precision turbos run?

That does sound VERY dubious. Why would the fact it has a T3 or T4 flange change the flow unless the T3 flange was actually limiting flow??

Whereas a twin scroll T4 turbo for example has 2 smaller separate paths for air to flow all the way through the turbo, not just at the flange.

My understanding is the flange just has to be big enough so as not to be a restriction in comparison to the flow the turbo can deliver.

I dont know of any rb30s with precision turbos. What do 2JZ supras with precision turbos run?

There may be some merit in his comment no? A T4 of the same a/r when compared to a T3 by definition should flow more; more area, larger nozzle = more flow. He did also agree with what was mentioned above in that a divided housing would flow roughly equal to one size lower in open flange form (not that i didnt believe that ;) )

Here's an interesting 2JZ auto dyno with a 6262 .68. However even his seems restricted. 19 psi run (im choking hard on 15). Source: http://www.clublexus...-automatic.html

PT6262_NOV09.jpg

Edited by ST240

That looks like a horribly mismatched turbo, full boost at over 5k on a 3L and torque starts dropping off straight away and it only makes ~320rwkw?

What a heap of shit lol. A gt3076 on 18psi would be on song by 3.3k and make ~300rwkw on the same boost on a 3L

Edited by Rolls

Like i said I have a divided manifold with the appropriate runners in each port. What I lack is dual wastegates.

On a separate note, I was told by the precision guys that a .82 T3 open housing flows the same as between a .58 and .68 T4 open housing. Can anyone confirm? Sounds quite dubious.They also told me they dont offer any larger turbines because they "feel you should be moving to a 6265 if youre flowing that much". Lol. Guess the GT35R with a 1.06 is a silly idea then :rolleyes: .

Don't happen to have a sensor bung at all you could measure the pressure with in the exhaust manifold? :)

That would give you the answer very quickly.

Also done runs without the exhaust on the car? (dump only etc?)

That looks like a horribly mismatched turbo, full boost at over 5k on a 3L and torque starts dropping off straight away and it only makes ~320rwkw?

What a heap of shit lol. A gt3076 on 18psi would be on song by 3.3k and make ~300rwkw on the same boost on a 3L

You aren't the first person to say this. Another member on here ran a Precision 5557 on his 25det and had similar results; lots of boost and not a lot of power. Define horribly mis matched? It has almost the exact same specs as a GT35R! I'm really starting to wonder about Precision.

Don't happen to have a sensor bung at all you could measure the pressure with in the exhaust manifold? :)

That would give you the answer very quickly.

Also done runs without the exhaust on the car? (dump only etc?)

I was thinking of doing this thru my egt port but figured it was kind of moot as per this discussion and nistune load tapering off :) . What is it again, backpressure equalling 2x your boost means its restricted? I have not tried dump only.

Edited by ST240

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • (Rb25det intake manifold) I’m having a hell of a time trying to find the full part or part number of this coolant hardline so far I was given these (Below) but they aren’t what I’m looking for and was told it’s the IAR or aac valve but that doesn’t seem to be it either. If someone could point me in the right direction it’d be greatly appreciated. Or if anyone has it for sale that’d be great too. I have recently purchased a greddy manifold and I can’t seem to find my old one to pull it off.  (Front Heater Return / Water Pipe (under intake): Primary part: 14053‑21U10 (front return pipe assembly for R33/R34 RB25DET) Alternative listing: 14053‑21U00 (same pipe, sometimes interchangeably referenced)   Heater Feed Pipe: Listed as 14075‑04U00 or feed-related variant 14053‑AG500)    
    • This sounds cool. But, as per usual, anything really complicated like that, that I take on, constitutes a steep learning curve that I never actually "learn". I just get it working, install it and start using it. Then, when it breaks a few months later, I've got no memory of what I did, how I did it, or even the bloody IP address I gave it. I'm having more or less exactly that problem right now. My Proxmox machine was discovered to be non-responsive, and the VMs on it were ditto. Power cycle it to a stream of loud Dell beep codes - which was unpopular at midnight, I can tell you. Move it to the lounge room so I can HDMI it to the TV for a screen, see the boot messages complaining about the /PVE/data having all sorts of LVM problems, saying it needs to be fixed manually. And I'm like....great. How am I going to work out what I need to do? At least it wasn't the stupid Silicon Power SSD shat itself. Mental note for all readers - DO NOT BUY SP SSDS! They are shit. I have had one take out an entire VM setup already, and this one could have done the same. Maybe it actually has. Cheap Chinesium shitbaskets. I won't cheap out again, even on play projects with no budget. Because my time budget having to fix shit is worth far more than the cost of proper parts.
    • I do typically agree. These days even the screens most people use have more of a boot time than the main device. However, I've seen an interesting use of the RPi in vehicle, however it involves effectively building your own OS and MBR, as then it boots up exceptionally quickly, as you don't have everything needing to start up, and you can then also run it up as an RTOS, while still having more compute than an Android can give for things like display, and processing. A very huge task that would be though for Duncan, I'm not sure that's his skill set (or Arduino programming and wiring) ha ha. If end goal is definitely just water cooling, Arduino would be the simpler setup especially for a rookie. If he wants extra display stuff though, bashing some code in Python on an RPi may be the better result for both systems.   Unfortunately the new device I'm building at work which runs a display, is too slow of a display for dashboard style purposes. More extreme low power, update only a couple of times a day type system
    • I don't like "actual computers" for in car use. They take time to boot up, have OS annoyances, and so on. Arduinos etc are ready to go a few seconds after power on, don't mind being agressively powere cycled, because everything is non-volatile, don't mind being shaken and stirred.
    • As Fred would tell us, it's all about interpreting the rules. It's not a water sprayer, it's a water mister... But everything else you've said, 100%! Even a raspberry Pi would be great, use HDMI out for a display, and add a raspberry Pi CANBus hat to read values out from the ECU.
×
×
  • Create New...