Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all I read some contradicting information yesterday the cams manual (book) for 3D stated that the maximum engine capacity for a turbo multi valve engine was 2520cc but the online specs state 3529cc and do not mention anything about a different spec for multi valve engines.

Have the specs changed?

Also there is a multiplication factor for multi valve engines (1.3) and the 1.7 for forced induction.

Have cams removed the multi valve engine bit for sports sedans? Or do you still have to do the 1.3 x cc x 1.7 and it is not on the online specs.

Cheers,

Ryan

I've approached them about my F6 engined R34 skyline thats coming along. I've been told I'll be able to run it providing there is no objections from current competitors.

I'll tread carefully but seriously it's not going to do low 29's at the creek so they are safe in their dinosaur 6L Chevys for a while yet.

Just have to be cautious around ex taxi owners.... :P

I've approached them about my F6 engined R34 skyline thats coming along. I've been told I'll be able to run it providing there is no objections from current competitors.

I'll tread carefully but seriously it's not going to do low 29's at the creek so they are safe in their dinosaur 6L Chevys for a while yet.

Just have to be cautious around ex taxi owners.... :P

They do eastern creek in 1:29's ????? wtf

absolutely, irs a shame more of the 3D cars don't take supersprints like the World Time Attck Challenge ™ more seriously. They could run 2-3 sec quicker on the right tyres for sure.

Remember lap records like "low 29s" only count when set in race setup, during a race. Not a single lap with no fuel on super cheater tyres.

Put a national level sports sedan on a super soft r comp tire even with their limited aero and it'll smack the shit out of the worlds precious time attack cars.

Why the hate. noone ever said they were the fastest cars on the planet. Time attack is simply another form of motorsport That a lot of pople on this forum and others enjoy immensely.

I bet a gt500 with r compound tyres would smack the shit outta those sports sedans too....oh wait. :rolleyes:

No hate here, I like time attack cars there is 4 of them in my workshop currently.

I just can't stand the hype about smashing v8 lap records blah blah.

How can you compare a tube chassied mid engine sports cars on slicks the size of 44 gallon drums to cars built on factory chassis runnig r type compound.

If they couldnt beat a time attack car they should hang their head in shame.

And either I am blind or the sports sedans I am thinkig of have more aero than a 747.

And Noel...don't forget "Time Attack" means something to you banana benders that is different to the rest of the country :P

I agree Duncan. We, along with parts of the usa and britain embraced the ethos of japanese time attack to a greater degree than the rest of the country as evident by the big dollar builds and the popularity of the time attack/sprint series we run up here.

So I'm guessing its all log booked now Rytech?

nice one :)

now AASA log book it too, and enter the next MRA in October...you too Brad.

and you too Druncan.

yep yep all good woohoo.

now just weighing up engine options as i want to stay aligned with the regs so it is an official legal SS blocker hehe

thanks for the info.

yep yep all good woohoo.

now just weighing up engine options as i want to stay aligned with the regs so it is an official legal SS blocker hehe

thanks for the info.

We have been running our R33 in Sports Sedan - state (NSW) for a couple of years, just competed at national event (breifly) at Eastern Creek, Shannons Round as Sports Sedan.

Qualified 4th in the wet - gear box lasted a lap and a half in the dry / another!!

State point score / class is based on times whereas national is based on full floor and have separate 4wd class - have had for quite some time.

Our taxi is 4 seconds quicker at EC on touring car control tyre, but ran out of bits to compete engine build for Shannons last week, if anyone has got a hollinger / GTR please PM

Cheers

Stuart

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...