Jump to content
SAU Community

40kw @ all 4! - Dyno day pix and results...


Recommended Posts

Thanks to Nick and Sam for hosting us for a fun day :P

Not a huge turnout considering we were keen to do some fundraising for MAS, but many thanks to all those who came along. Ash arranged some fantastic trophies (can someone post a photo, I forgot) and the 'How much power does the Lada have' comp was great fun and helped raise a bit of coin :)

So...

Best power 4WD was JagR33 (Jack), best power RWD was Slayer_1971 (Rohan). Can't remember exact numbers - Rohan, Ash has your trophy.

The Lada made 40kw at all 4 wheels - with a top speed of 136km/h :)

Snowman (Andrew) was closest at 37kw!

The raffle was not run, as not enough people were there - so we'll hold it at AutoSalon, buy tix from the stand, to draw on Sunday arvo when the dyno comp finishes.

Thanks again to everyone who came along :P

Just a couple of photos:

getreal.jpg

lada1.jpg

lada2.jpg

lada3.jpg

lada4.jpg

James

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37213-40kw-all-4-dyno-day-pix-and-results/
Share on other sites

if some people didnt know me i was the guy who turned up in the red ford raider that would easily put the lada niva gtr to shame (a mazda engine is better than a french engine/commy engerneering)

i had to leave because today was a greek festival and it was my final performance after 13 years, so yeah had to rest for that, and i also met steve bracks, but didnt hit him, he shook my hand....sorry guys :P

Wow...Didn't think I'd win a trophy for the best power RWD....I beleave my best run was about 161KW.....Had to leave early but James I've deposited some money into your account as a donation.

Thanks to all the organisers

Rowan

hahahahaha 40kw at all 4 :(

sorry couldnt make it... had to fix up mine and josies car

i have some things for the raffle... those bendix metals for the rears of a 32... kinda stupid if u dont have a 32 but u could always sell them for some bling bling :D

btw james i xfered the $10 into ur account for the shirts for me an josie cause i only gave u 50 at the last MAS meeting

And the trophy probably would have suited you too INASNT :(

Correction: there were plenty of people who turned up - its just that not a lot actually dyno'd their cars. Including me because I don't want to start all over again with dyno's - better to stick to same brand AND workshop for comparing future mods etc. I know it was a fundraiser but I didnt have the cash to do a dyno just for the sake of it.

Was good to catch up with people and talk to a couple of new people too :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...