Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Really need to start squatting myself...have neglected my legs bad over the last few years...although I do run, which helps a bit.

Used to do dumbell squats side by side. I liked these because you could go as deep as your ass on the ground, with relative ease. No need to screw around with the squat rack and a bar across the top of your back. They give your grip and and traps a good workout too.

150kg for 8 reps. I weigh 75kg :P

Have only been training legs for 3 months now. But have recently changed my entire program to do less intense leg work but hit them 4 days a week. I know.... To much or what ever, but this is my first week on it and I've read a lot of different stuff on the matter so I'll see how it goes.

Too much controversy when it comes to squats and guys at my gym have stupid ego but zero form. I smash my legs twice a week at the gym with 1 day involving heavy lifting and the other day involving hypertrophy training. I can only squat 60kg + bar @ 10 reps but I sacrifice weight with perfect form and ensuring my arse is almost touching the ground. You can perform half squats which have shown to work other muscles of the legs. In time I will slowly ramp up the weight until I maintain form everytime I do my squats.'

Any leg training day by far is the most intense but also number 1 for best gains overall :D

Really need to start squatting myself...have neglected my legs bad over the last few years...although I do run, which helps a bit.

Used to do dumbell squats side by side. I liked these because you could go as deep as your ass on the ground, with relative ease. No need to screw around with the squat rack and a bar across the top of your back. They give your grip and and traps a good workout too.

I used to hate doing squats due to the upper back/neck pain pain associated with it, until the new gym i joined up has a Mantaray on their squat rack.. Squats have now become my favorite workout choice. Squats is the most effective and efficient workout method for legs bar none. Legs press/curls on machines is just a waste of time i reckon.

If they dont have a Mantaray at your gym just buy one, its relatively cheap

mantaray_02.jpg

you have to have good flexibility in your ankles/hips to go really low (otherwise you lose balance)... I can't touch my butt to my heels but I go as low as I can

Barbarian: the bar in the squat racks is usually 20kg, so that would put you at 100kg

JKR-32: 150kg is a good squat for someone who weighs 75kg, that's twice your body weight dude, nice!

I'm 85kg so haven't got to double my bodyweight yet... although I still have a few kilos to lose so my lean bodyweight is probably around 80kg

I'm doing 160kg for 6 but I don't go super deep, somewhere between a 'half squat' thighs parallel to the ground and a 'full squat' butt touching heels

if your leg strength is okay but your struggling to keep your back from rounding (your back should stay 100% locked in the same position) you need to do some more back work... rows, glute ham raises, deadlifts etc

I agree that it's the most efficient. I did get some good results from 45 degree leg presses a few years back though. It's essentially the same motion, just without the core stability. Twas my most noticeable increase in muscle out of my whole exercise routine, in fact, but that's most likely because leg exercises are.

I like the dumbells because you can do them anywhere and with little equipment.

Too much controversy when it comes to squats and guys at my gym have stupid ego but zero form. I smash my legs twice a week at the gym with 1 day involving heavy lifting and the other day involving hypertrophy training. I can only squat 60kg + bar @ 10 reps but I sacrifice weight with perfect form and ensuring my arse is almost touching the ground. You can perform half squats which have shown to work other muscles of the legs. In time I will slowly ramp up the weight until I maintain form everytime I do my squats.'

Any leg training day by far is the most intense but also number 1 for best gains overall :D

Word up.

If you want a good form and great physique, doing squats in a calm fashion is the way to do it. I do at min 10reps + 4 sets. By the time im finished my legs are throbbing and it feels great man.. haha

Another advantage of leg/squat workout is it also works on your core area. Its just been recently i've gotten back in to gym again and had a developed a little belly over the few months, a muffin top if you call it but after hitting the legs for the pass couple months my stomach is flat, showing some ab cuts underneath.

Doing cardio for a good 20 mins before leg workout also helps

yeah if your going to compare squats they all have to be at the MINIMUM parallel otherwise keep pulling your dick :)

Also the bar is always included in the total weight so you don't have to say plus bar.

Squatted 120 for 20 atg last week, haven't done any 1rms for a few years now(best was 180 at 78)

they have a padded roll at my gym that helps make it a bit less painful... the girls fold up a towel as well but those Mantaray things look really cool

if your traps are relatively well developed they help keep the bar off the vertebrae which is what's most uncomfortable about squatting IMHO

got this guy at my gym who is always doing exercises with maybe 25% of the full range of motion... he was doing weighted pull ups and hardly moving up and down more than 20cm... same with the T Bar rows he was doing... maybe he knows something I don't but it looks ridiculous... he's one of those guys who's very lean, looks great but no mass and is always trying to lift way too much with hardly any range of motion

I agree that it's the most efficient. I did get some good results from 45 degree leg presses a few years back though. It's essentially the same motion, just without the core stability. Twas my most noticeable increase in muscle out of my whole exercise routine, in fact, but that's most likely because leg exercises are.

I like the dumbells because you can do them anywhere and with little equipment.

But your limited to around 100kg which is nothing when it comes to squatting. Good as a supplementary exercise but it cannot

replace barbell squatting.

It only takes a couple heavy sessions for your traps to get used to the bar and then you can't feel it.

Another good leg strength exercise is the farmer's walk...just carrying a couple of dumbells by your side and walking with them. It's so simple yet effective...simulating the weight of a fat person without actually being fat = strong legs. And because you're not standing in a static position, ala squats, you create some really useful strength (athletics, sports etc.). Probably a good idea to use them in conjunction.

But your limited to around 100kg which is nothing when it comes to squatting. Good as a supplementary exercise but it cannot

replace barbell squatting.

It only takes a couple heavy sessions for your traps to get used to the bar and then you can't feel it.

120kg at my gymnasium. When you're doing full ass-to-ground squats with that, and your goal isn't to become a power lifter, that's plenty.

120kg at my gymnasium. When you're doing full ass-to-ground squats with that, and your goal isn't to become a power lifter, that's plenty.

No it's not at all. The only reason everything thinks that is because no one trains legs as much as they should.

Most people are benching around 100kg, then struggle to squat 100kg. That is DISGUSTING!

If people actually trained like they should, 120 atg squats would still be warming up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
    • Ceste, jak se mas Marek...sorry I only have english keyboard. Are you a fan of Poland's greatest band ever?   
×
×
  • Create New...