Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I found this inlet manifold adaptor to fit Rb26 inlet plenum and ITB's on the Rb25's plus they do a Rb20 version

At first I thought they did the old cut and weld option onto a rb25 inlet runners, but it is different

Then I thought they had done a cut and weld onto a rb25 greddy style inlet manifold, but no

I think they have made up a new casting with mounting plates to bolt the ITB's onto and have made a remote seperate IAC box. It does away with the rb26 injector section of the inlet.

The attached pic's are are R34 Rb25det version.

Having a close look at the adpator it looks the same a greddy style manifold around the injectors ports and mounts. The flange onto the ITB's looks to be a 1 piece casting, ie not welded onto the runners.

Also the reason I think it is not a greddy style manifold is the angle of the radiator hose connection.

It is square like a factory manifold and not at a angle like the greddy.

The main negative problems with either the Blitz style adaptor plate is the angle of the injectors and the cut and shunt to stock manifold is the different runner spacing and angles.

With this version they seem to have solved those issues, I can not see any problems or disadvantage with this design

Cost is not cheap at approx $700-750 plus post form Japan etc.

Does not include the rb26 setup, so add $300-400.

Your thoughts??

I have Neo rb25det with greddy style manifold already, but would luv ITB's with VCT

post-14923-0-32770100-1312334463_thumb.jpg

post-14923-0-24473500-1312334473_thumb.jpg

post-14923-0-94677300-1312334480_thumb.jpg

Edited by darrinspencer

I found them on Yahoo. I think it will be close to $950-1000 landed

http://www.importmonster.com.au/view?url=http://page6.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/f101401033&thumb=http://f6.auctions.c.yimg.jp/img321.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/users/2/4/5/6/assemble2006-thumb-1297139207470101.jpg&title=RB25 NEO6 GTR KIT

As mentioned, they do a Rb20, R33 Rb25 and R34 Neo kit.

No mention on the company who makes them

They look similar quality to the other cheap chinese greddy styles manifolds.

They only cost approx $150 wholesale price in china for example.

Might try and find the supplier/manufacture as I have a few contacts and inport some parts from china now.

I currently run the greddy style copy on my Neo with gt3076r

I am very keen to try one of these out and do back to back test.

It won't be be for at least to 6-8 weeks thuo.

I can't really see any negatives with this setup?

Anyone have any idea's??

Edited by darrinspencer

i mean when you run the rb26 ITB's it apprently eliminates the vct.

I think that would happen when you use the full Rb26 intake with injector section and an adaptor plate as it would foul the VCT solnoid>

This kit is cast the same way, ie rad hose connection as the Rb25 manifold so it will clear the VCT. win win.

I have just email Aaron at IM to see if he can contact the seller and find out more info.

i found these on yahoo yesterday also after posting my comment.

although i could only find kits for rb20 and neo rb25

my rb25 is a s2 r33 engine.

definitely do more research into where the manifold is made, im eager to purchase asap

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...