Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all. Yet another noob question to ask. How do you tell if the standard shocks on the R33 are stuffed and need replacement? When i said tell, i meant by the way the shocks handle bumps and whether they are noisy. My ride's shocks go squish on all four whenever I go over a hump and I'm not sure if that's how they are or they're stuffed. Also, my R33 seem to have a slight bodyroll on cornering at 40km/h. Are my swaybar bushings shot or am I asking a stupid question as my understanding is that ALL cars will have bodyroll at a certain speed onwards and performance cars WILL have some sort of bodyroll even with swaybars on, except that the difference being between having a sway bar and not having one.

Opened up a new thread on this as I couldn't find a similar thread asking this. Will appreciate all responds.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373206-standard-r33-shocks/
Share on other sites

Hi all. Yet another noob question to ask. How do you tell if the standard shocks on the R33 are stuffed and need replacement? When i said tell, i meant by the way the shocks handle bumps and whether they are noisy. My ride's shocks go squish on all four whenever I go over a hump and I'm not sure if that's how they are or they're stuffed. Also, my R33 seem to have a slight bodyroll on cornering at 40km/h. Are my swaybar bushings shot or am I asking a stupid question as my understanding is that ALL cars will have bodyroll at a certain speed onwards and performance cars WILL have some sort of bodyroll even with swaybars on, except that the difference being between having a sway bar and not having one.

Opened up a new thread on this as I couldn't find a similar thread asking this. Will appreciate all responds.

Cheers

Check for leaks and also if when you go over bumps the car bounces up and down excessively that is generally a sign that they are wearing out, or simply push down on the car to test. In regards to the body roll the standard shocks on R33's are really shit. Worthwhile saving up and buying a shock/spring combo or adjustable coilovers.

You can get free inspections done at suspension specialist shops if you're unsure.

To check the condition of the shocks, "bounce" the corner of the car. A good shock should stop the bounce in about 1 cycle. And going "squish" is a sure sign that the shocks are not healthy. Also, you will find that the (current) ride quality is actually harsher than if you had new uprated shocks fitted.

ALL cars, even F1, have body roll in corners. It is a result of the weight being transferred to the outside of the corner. It's all about physics. You can reduce the body roll by fitting upgraded sway bars (DO NOT use springs / shocks to control body roll).

In theory you should replace the factory shocks after 50-60,000 kms, personally I haven't replaced mine, and I work in a suspension shop, but these will be the first main change my car will be getting once I get around to doing it, you really can't put a price on shockies.

I know a set of bilsteins I bought were f**ked because when I went over a dump, they were so soft and flat the front of the car would thud on the ground.

They should feel springy, not sloppy. Bilstein shocks are the best replacement and fine some nice springs for them. All depends what you do with the car. If you go adjustable coilover, make sure you get one with a big resevoir or external one so you can control the ride feel. Ive got height adjustable teins, bumpy as shit on the road.

As for the body roll, Ive taken turns at about 60km and you can feel that any more than that the car is just going to roll. Depends what kind of a turn you are talking about, surface of the road etc. Sway bars are the way to go. 16 year old cars here, the bushings are probably dry, cracked, leaky etc.

Edited by SargeRX8

(DO NOT use springs / shocks to control body roll).

I have always been told the opposite, springs and shocks should be primarily used to control body roll while swaybars are there to assist the springs / shocks. Reason being that springs / shocks will control roll in all axes but swaybars will only control left/right

I'm just guessing that in physics, bodyroll is caused by the sudden shift in weight of the body of the car. Maybe Cassbo is right in saying that shocks and springs can control the bodyroll and the swaybars will only assist in the process. But at the same time, I also guess that people tend not to rely too much on only shocks and springs is that in normal street driving, the spring rates are not as high and will NOT support as much bodyroll as higher rated coilovers do on the track, thus the major emphasis is on swaybars to do the job for cars that are mainly driven on the street.

Someone confirm this for me or correct me if I'm wrong?

Have a think about why swaybars are called swaybars...... Springs and shocks are there to work in tandem to control bumps and undulations in the road surface to keep the car level and swaybars control the sway in cars around corners. Simple as that guys.

Look at how a sway bar works and consider its proper name: anti-roll bar. If you go over a judder bar just to be extreme the left and right arms go up in unison and down in unison just swivelling in their mounts and thus have no effect on the car. Its is only when you throw the car into a turn that the arms move in opposite directions and exert a twisting motion on the bar which will tend to return to its original shape thus reducing roll.

To test a shock as above ^^^: push heavily down on a corner of the car and let go. It should bounce back up and stop dead. If it starts to go down again of its own accord its stuffed. Alternatively some suspension shops will repeat this test for free with a meter attached which will measure the the rebound and give you a printout.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...