Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

you haters are crazy.

id love to see 2 r33 turbos in a twin set up.

less laggy, more useable power on the street then a big big single.

who cares if they end up breaking, they are cheap as piss to replace.

And you can build the setup for under a grand easily.

you haters are crazy.

id love to see 2 r33 turbos in a twin set up.

less laggy, more useable power on the street then a big big single.

who cares if they end up breaking, they are cheap as piss to replace.

And you can build the setup for under a grand easily.

Not less laggy. More laggy. You're using turbos designed for 2.5L and only running them with 1.5L. And then you still have crappy ceramic wheels that can't reliably take more than 12psi at the most.

And who cares if they blow? You realize there is the possibility of taking the motor with them right?

Edited by Hanaldo

I agree. More lag, and much more risk of losing an engine. If a wheel explodes when you're offend throttle at high revs, with the throttle body shut, and the ability for the engine to suck back from the exhaust, if it pulled some bits of turbo into the cylinder, boom.

You'll have about a $3k rebuild on your hands. New pistons, rings, bearings, bore, hone, etc.

Standards really are a bad idea. Especially with unknown kms

i disagree, for starters, whats wrong with just running 12 psi?? you have the potential to make minimum 300kw and it will definately make that power earlier in the rev range then a big single will.

also, a huge amount of people push more then 12psi through 33 turbos all day anyway with no issue, chances of damaging motor... slim.

i think its a good idea, cheap easy driveable power.

go for it!

Not less laggy. More laggy. You're using turbos designed for 2.5L and only running them with 1.5L. And then you still have crappy ceramic wheels that can't reliably take more than 12psi at the most.

And who cares if they blow? You realize there is the possibility of taking the motor with them right?

Lol of course I have "done my homework" and if I wanted to (and kept the missus happy) I could go out and buy whatever setup i chose tomorrow, paid in cash. I've already posted how much this is going to cost. I don't pay a mechanic or a welder/fabricator to work on it as I have extensive experience in these industries. The flanges are in the mail as I type and should arrive this week. It will be built as soon as all the parts arrive. As most are aware the r33 s2 turbo spools up real early. Maybe some have forgotten what a stock turbo feels like on a 25. On a 30 it will be way to small. Hence 2 turbo's. I just went for a drive to see how early the single spools up. 4th gear from about 40 kph. 12 psi at 2200. 14.5psi at 2500 rpm. I could probably get it to spool 100 rpm earlier with a change in the tune but it might be a bit hot. Also that is with only a bleed valve and a spring on the outside of the actuator that holds 9.5 psi. Those pressures are at the manifold btw. I tried holding the brake and it went to 14.5 at 2300. Have a look here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYW_7gltGVo Its a bit wonky but if you pause it you can see it. If you see my other one its a bit old.

If you want original, why not three?

Believe me I had that idea already. Intake and exhaust piping isn't that much more difficult to knock up so to speak. It would be a tight fit tho. I haven't researched 3 either, ie :which turbos to use. I'll stick with 2 for now. I've sussed it all out and it should work pretty good.

88cameron88, this was actually a 2.5 litre. With a well set up gt3076, water meth injection, and lots of tuning to perfection done by me, it was a weapon.

I think in the lower gears it was a little higher. More like 4,000 rpm to make 12psi.

But, I think our friend here that says he's done his homework doesn't realise that when my gt3076 is making 12psi, it's a lot more flow than his standard turbo at 12psi.

Hence why all if the reasoning here is poorly thought out.

Standards early? No.

R33 bush turbo spooling earlier than a ball bearing Garrett? No.

Laggy? Yes.

Risky? Yes.

Time wasting? My opinion, yes. More time wasted stuffing around with a setup that won't work instead of driving it on a track.

well I reckon we can start placing bets on this.

I'll take 'Its never gunna happen' for the win :laugh:

Ok bud. You're on. But since you wont pay up when you lose so you can just look like a cock instead. :thumbsup: I'll keep ya posted lol

Whilst I still side with the majority on the silliness of the idea, one point comes to mind ref the boost limits and safety.

If 12psi is the sensible limit on the standard turbo on 2.5 litres, then you will be able to run much more boost at the same shaft speed when it's only working a 1.5 litre half engine. Just like using a 25 turbo on a 20, only better. Higher boost = higher exhaust temperatures of course, especially with tuning that is leaner than standard, so perhaps you can't drive them up to silly high boost (or what seems silly when talking about these turbos), but it should at least be a lot less likely to spit turbines off at 12psi than we've all been assuming so far.

That said, if you (the OP) are still intent on doing twins, for christ's sake, don't use Nissan turbos. The TD04s I talked about are just as plentiful, just as cheap, physically smaller and better suited to pairing up on a 2.5L.

Geez calm down everyone. I'm going to do this no matter what. I couldn't give two f**ks if its better or worse than anything else. Its just something to do that cost bugger all. Refer to the initial question.Tha'ts all I was thinking about. I have researched out the arse. I know that other setups work better. I don't care either. IVF works better than sex so are you all going to give up rooting? I thought not. :iluvff:

Only if you're trying to make babies. And if you're aiming to do that every time you have sex, then you're doing it wrong.

I think there's a message in there for you.

We're actually trying for a baby atm. But tha'ts a bit off topic isn't it. This twin setup isn't anything that I or anyone should lose sleep over. I'm doing it for fun. It will work no doubt. Might not compare to new ball bearing turbos. Doesn't matter tho. Just out of curiosity....who here has done this or are we all guessing, no matter how educated the guess may be?

But, I think our friend here that says he's done his homework doesn't realise that when my gt3076 is making 12psi, it's a lot more flow than his standard turbo at 12psi.

Mate if you reckon that then how could I have any idea about how to do this? What am I 15 :no:?

Hence why all if the reasoning here is poorly thought out. Who mentioned reasoning? Like I said its for cheap fun.

Standards early? No. Never said it would be. Guessing about 4k at full boost with ebc.

R33 bush turbo spooling earlier than a ball bearing Garrett? No. Never said this either

Laggy? Yes. Slightly less than twice as much as standard

Risky? Yes. Half as risky as standard.

Time wasting? My opinion, yes. More time wasted stuffing around with a setup that won't work instead of driving it on a track. Not interested in a track mate. If doing car stuff is a waste of time catch a bus or walk.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...