Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Recently got a 33 series 2 gts. The front bar is a bit flaky, previous owner said he got it resprayed 2 years ago but its flaked again.

Now i noticed that there is no struts or anything on this thing, so if i grab it, i can sorta squish it.

Seems to me, that over time when the cars moving, the bumper is moving around/expanding/squishing in slightly, which is causing the paint to flake.

Is there supposed to be more support or is this pretty common for skylines to have it sorta just hanging off?

post-60878-0-44529500-1312991814_thumb.jpg

post-60878-0-96311600-1312991837_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373654-r33-series-2-gts-front-bumper-query/
Share on other sites

My car had a poor condition bumper which I bought second hand to replace a aftermaket front bumper. The paint wasn't cracked. I merely bumped, BUMPED, those f**king concrete stops at the end of a parking slot and the paint cracked left right and center. Plastic will bend and the paint on it is not very flexible so it cracks. Fiberglass bumpers on the other hand just f**king deteriorate into shit so be glad you've only got the stock bumper there.

I wouldn't paint it either. My car had one of the front quater panels painted(It was driven up a kerb caused some damage, not by me). It doesn't look obvious but its noticeable. If you respray the front, there is NO WAY you can blend in the 15 years of exposure the paint has had and the front is going to look different. Just leave it.

The R33 doesn't have much holding the front bumper, go to any car dealer, look at any R33 GTS25T and give the bottom corners of the front bumper a wobble, they jiggle alot lol and if you can squeeze hard enough I'm sure you can squish them.

Some people go Series 1 front bumper on a series 2 as it sits higher on a lowered car and not as much chance of scraping, I wouldn't do this as series 1 front end looks like dogs balls compared to series 2.

I wouldn't paint it either. My car had one of the front quater panels painted(It was driven up a kerb caused some damage, not by me). It doesn't look obvious but its noticeable. If you respray the front, there is NO WAY you can blend in the 15 years of exposure the paint has had and the front is going to look different. Just leave it.

Sorry about the hijack,but i had my rear quarter painted recently,stuck to the original paint code and it looks darker than the rest of the car,it sticks out so fkn bad. There is absolutely no way to blend in?

Thanks for the advice guys! Appreciate it :)

Yeah previous owner had it pretty low, Ive since then raised it a bit. I noticed if i feel underneath it definitely has scraped something at some point, so thats prob what caused it.

Or the respray wasnt done properly. Could be a combination.

Hmm thanks for the tip about respraying, i was thinking of getting it done, but if its gonna stick out like you guys said, ill prob just stick with it. It looks fine as is. Might just touch up a few spots and leave it.

Get a good paint shop and you won't have problems - especially with white as it doesn't fade like the other Nissan factory colours. I've had my bumper resprayed twice over the last 5 years and it's been matched perfectly each time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...