Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi,

ive just replaced my old turbo with my new one and for some reason it wont boost at all as ive only changed the turbo and everything was put back to the way it was as in intake pipe and plumped bov and as soon as i try to hit boost it wont go past 0.

im thinking it might be actuator stuck or something but not sure.

I have taken the intake pipe to see if turbo is seized but spins nice and freely also checked all exhaust bolts all fine.

any ideas on wat it could be? or to no if its the actuator is working or not?

any help would be great.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/377815-new-turbo-installed-but-wont-boost/
Share on other sites

its a split dump pipe,but its a straight bolt on turbo to suit RB25det.

what can be done for this to be sorted out?

do i need a new dump pipe or can i buy one like from just jap or something like that?

Just had a look and at the dump pipe and not sure wat it is. all i no and can see is the back dump pipe bolts on to the turbo and there a lil groove were the dump pipe bolt goes but cant see it being split.

so dont think its a split dump pipe.

looks like the ones they sell on justjap but not stainless steel

start the car and let it idle, pull actuator line off but so its still connected on actuator end, put and air blower in the hose and force some pressure into it, if it opens ull hear it, if it doesnt then it probably stuck on something

i blew air into the actuator line and it moved back and forth so that seem to be working.

Dont really no what else it could be as all ive done is replaced the turbo with a bigger one, i even checked the oil liine if it was getting oil and thats all fine and good.

even reving it on idle it makes a lil sound from the pod but nothing like the stock turbo as u can feel just from idle and reving it,it doesnt seem or feel right,it just sounds like blocked or something.

hopefully someone can help cause im out of ideas.

Massive restriction on intake side or massive leak on pressure side. If you've already checked that the wastegate is functioning and the turbo is spinning then has to be one of these

Could also possibly be an exhaust gasket. Did you replace them with new items when you put the new turbo on? (T3 flange gasket will cause more problems then the dump pipe gasket)

the only thing i have done diff from the stock turbo and intake and pressure side is for the intake to turbo put a 3 inch to 3inch rubber silicone hose which on the stock one i had 3inch to the turbo intake 2.5inch and from the other part that goes to intercooler is a 90 degree bend which ofcourse the factory one wont work and i put new gaskets,bought a gasket kit from autobarn.

the turbo does spin freely and nice with my fingers but cant reall see if its spinning on idle without the front intake coming off and then wont idle ofcourse without the intake/afm.

anyway around seeing if the turbo spins on idle withouth the intake with afm that goes to turbo?

what turbo is it?

Where did you get it?

Was it brand new or used?

Did you use new gaskets on the exhaust side?

Are you sure the wastegate is sealing, has it got enough preload on the wastegate?

i kind of put on the actuator rod tight on to the wasgate pin thingy as in adjusted the rod so it can hook on but made it tight so i have to pull the rod a couple of mm to hook on as thought it would close the waste gat flap as i as told.

is that wat you mean by preload or is it something else?

It wouldn't be actuator related. cos if the actuator was blocked, it would overboost.

does it sound like the exhaust is leaking?

what boost gauge are you using? stock? aftermarket? is it hooked up correctly?

double check your BOV. if the BOV was somehow forced open it would recirculate all the air straight back to the turbo.

you can take the AFM off and blow through it, the car will run like shit but you'll be able to see if the turbo spins. just blow lightly like idle.

try to post a pic or vid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...