Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey ive searched but not found my answer ..

i have a gt2871R with 56trim, it has r33 housings on it, ive been looking thru silvia forums and guys on there are getting figures of upto 260kw's using this turbo but in smaller trim and .63 turbine housing, so my question is if this turbo was fitted with a .86 housing (garrett)

and run on 18-20psi ( apparently its most efficient pressures) will it achieve upto 260kw or even more? if a silvia 2L can make 260kw with supporting mods with smaller specs can an rb25 make the same or more or will the bigger engine hit big exhaust restriction with the smaller 53mm turbine wheel??

also worth noting is hypergear uses 2871r and 3071r for its highflows ( correct me if im wrong) so anyone know what the full output can be on an rb with all supporting mods etc..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378197-gt28-potential/
Share on other sites

Dude you can't just whack a bigger rear housing on, wind up the boost and make it just make more and more horsepower.

The size of the compressor is the limiting factor, and in this case, I'm pretty sure anything past 260rwkw will be very difficult. I doubt you'd even make much more power anyway. The compressor will be choked up.

Solution? Get a bigger compressor. This means a gt30 series.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378197-gt28-potential/#findComment-6031152
Share on other sites

The 56 trim wheel in the GT2871r is the same compressor as the off the shelf GT3071r but in this case its the turbine that restricts the turbo as it can't drive the compressor hard enough to reach it's potential. The 0.86 rear (probably 0.82 if It's a T3 housing) will help to not choke the turbine but you will still be around 20kw down on the same compressor mated to a GT30 turbine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378197-gt28-potential/#findComment-6031177
Share on other sites

so it is the same 71mm compressor, i wouldnt expect the same as a gt30's output, was just curious to if it can make 250-260kw, the silvia's seem to be making it so i thought why not on an rb.. on the garrett website it says 475hp so that would be 280-290 , but im not saying it would do that..

maybe i should be asking, what is the max output on a gt28 housing with cams etc assuming it can hold high boost for short periods..

Edited by SliverS2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378197-gt28-potential/#findComment-6031223
Share on other sites

Dude you can't just whack a bigger rear housing on, wind up the boost and make it just make more and more horsepower.

The size of the compressor is the limiting factor, and in this case, I'm pretty sure anything past 260rwkw will be very difficult. I doubt you'd even make much more power anyway. The compressor will be choked up.

Solution? Get a bigger compressor. This means a gt30 series.

the horsepower i am talking about is what is quoted on the garrett page, 475hp apparently but i dont know what the real world figure is.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378197-gt28-potential/#findComment-6031227
Share on other sites

GT2871 is ok for Rb20dets. it maxes 230rwkws on stock r33 housings and gets red hot. If you are looking for high flowing our current std or pu options will perform lot better.

isnt a .86garrett housing alot bigger than a stock r33 though, so maybe another 20 -30kws more

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378197-gt28-potential/#findComment-6031253
Share on other sites

Your forgetting that Garret's rating is fly wheel horse power. Not rear wheel horsepower.

yeah its 475flywheel horsepower times 0.75 =356kws at the flywheel then - say minus 60kw to give 290kw at the wheels.. thats if the garrett site is accurate

is that calculation correct?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378197-gt28-potential/#findComment-6031278
Share on other sites

well, from what i have heard, the gt30 variant is better, more power with less lag. i only know them as the 49,51 and 53mm comp inducers. the tiny little gt28 turbine is a major bottle neck. much like the older gt2540r.

on a s15, the 51mm aka -10. came on at 3800, changed to gt3071 same comp wheel, came on at 3300. and made more power.

so if you are thinking of getting one, get the gt3071. great turbo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378197-gt28-potential/#findComment-6031294
Share on other sites

that sounds alright, whats the top end like ? how much boost?

Revs nicely to 7400rpm, doesn't really let off til 7100rpm - a lot of that is in the tune though of course (ignition timing).

Truth be told, my gate control is REALLY crap atm, real hack job so no doubt could be much better but other responsibilities now prevent full setup changes etc.

Boost is at a max of 1.34 bar so approx 19.5 psi.

But with the current offerings from hypergear, i know what turbo i would prefer! ( one of those ss1 or ss2 items for sure and almost full bolt on)

As for your calculation, 356kw at engine = approx 250rwkw after drivetrain losses. I'm assuming a drivetrain loss of 30% which i think should be about right considering the period of our drivetrains and age of the box etc.

I'm about to change over to caltex e-flex so expecting 275rwkw on the same low reading dyno with the tiny turbo lol and that should do me happy - 245rwkw was already spinning second if the tires weren't properly warm (245 ku36's but on 1.2 negative camber)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378197-gt28-potential/#findComment-6031315
Share on other sites

Your forgetting that Garret's rating is fly wheel horse power. Not rear wheel horsepower.

your forgetting 280kw isnt 475hp.

i dont see any reason a rb25 couldnt make a healthy ~260rwkw with the proper garrett housing, you'll need to run a little more boost than you would with a gt30 but thats no big deal.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378197-gt28-potential/#findComment-6031561
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...