Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

When talking SS prices, be sure to be comparing like for like. There is 304 vs 316 (L grades of each) plus all the other grades of 300 stainless, that are often more suitable for exhausts. You then have various standards for tubing. Your 304 is typically welded tube fit for arhitectural hand rails etc (A554 etc). Some use it no problem in exhaust. Other standards are for pressure piping (A369/270 etc) , heat exchanger tube etc and are far more expensive.

Then on top you have wall thickness....so may not be a case of one place cheaper then others...usually just different. Anyone use Carringtons in western Sydney? They used to be cheaper then Midway, Atlas, Austeel, Sandvik, Prochem, Geordi etc etc

Nice work on the dumps...have to be happy with that :)

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yea very happy with it mate, very happy with what i paid for it all as well as i expected it to be alot more for the amount of effort that was put into it

cant remember what grade of Stainless was used, it was the good sh!t though, very smooth internally and the bends were the same diameter as the rest of the pipe..

wasnt 304, 316 possibly? dont know my stainless very well :thumbsup:

LOL, there are more important things in this world to know then grades of stainless :) My industry uses a lot of it so know a little, I am more interested in what lesser grades of stainless people use and get away with. I used 321 but not sure its worth the expense?

As with most of these things, they have different grades for a reason. A higher number doesn't mean it is better for the job.

304 is typically used in exhaust systems due to the fact it is more malleable and the higher grades like 316 and 321 will polish much shinier but are more brittle so are prone to cracking in high heat situations

Oh man...this is all from memory...so happy to be corrected. 321 is on paper better then 304 at elevated temperatures due to the inclusion of titanium in it and improves its mechanical properties at high temps. You can get high carbon variants of 304, which are termed 304H. Not 304, and certainly not 304L which is a low carbon version as like 316L they have reduced strength at high temperature so not used for structural/pressure applications at elevated temperatures.

We never use 304 in heat exchangers etc. Quite often we use 321 or other high carbon or stabilised austenitic stainless steels. In an exhaust you dont care about the corrosion properties of ss, rather things like the creep strength, thermal expansion and structural stability/embrittlement which is where the 321 is better. Though they are all about the same with regards to withstanding general corrosion at higher temps in only air.

Years ago I was my old employers boffin on stainless and material selection. That was 12 years ago and now moved more into management so have forgotten the ins and out of the metallurgy of how the grain structures change/react to temps etc. :(

But at the end of the day if people are using 1.2mm thick welded 304 tube in their dumps and lasting then who gives a shit what texts say. The proof is in the pudding. The lads where i used to work all used 321 for their crazy race boat headers and manifolds etc. The downstream exhaust was often 304, but the manifolds 321. I think you will generally find thats common practice in the old school world of header design and racing. Overkill? I dunno :(

ps...it was either Prochem or Atlas that had pretty good tech data which may be of interest to anyone that cares

This is exhaust tubing.

You regular stainless tube sales company that supplies to the automotive and/or light engineering or building industry is not going to be that technical on the grade to the point that you are explaining.

321 contains titanium but it would never be found at places like Tubesales or Right Price Exhausts. The difference between 304 and 316 is the inclusion of Moly in the 316. Their strength is much the same and they have similar corrosion resistance but when you subject 316 to hot and cold cycling close to the melting point, eventually the 316 becomes more brittle than than 304.

321 and 304H are not really used for exhausts. There is no point and they cost more.

304 wouldn't be used in heat exchangers because it is less resistance to corrosion than 321 so with steam, heat or presence of minerals and salts, it will withstand better.

Most of the above has nothing really to do with Joey's exhaust, however. The tube will be 304 or 316 (most likely the latter) and the specific details of the composition of the metal aren't going to change much for him between exhaust shops/fabricators

Dont exhaust boys purge weld stainless? I purge everything when it comes stainless pipe and tube it welds nicer and there aint no grinding dags inside pipe or tube ever

The material wont change the cost much, I would go stainless, especially if you plan to go e85.

I think $1500 would be the starting price for a good job, there is an easy 2 days doing it all properly, grinding the inside smooth takes time but nets the extra gains. Dont skimp as crunching the fabricator and making him cut corners will cost you power.

Its not just an exhaust shop you're going to is it? A good performance workshop/fabricator is required imo.

Most exhaust shops dont purge weld stainless because they more often then not MIG. Half the time you look inside and there is pterodactyl shit all over the ID. The other half there is nothing as there isnt full penetration with the weld. I suppose its all post turbine so not often viewed as being worth the expense of using the gas and having the extra regulators/hoses/bungs set up.

Elite, If exhaust places are making dumps out of 304 then good to know. It seems to be the guys that are more into the competition car prep/race fabrication that go for the 321. So probably overkill for road cars. Though if a burner and its coil bundle use 321, LOL I know my dump will outlast the rest of the car :)

The price of a mild steel mantle bend is around the 12 dollar mark for a stainless one it's around 65 for one bend. I don't see the big huff about stainless exhaust ends up looking like mild steel anyway after dyno time it would be around the 1200 mark because of so much stuffing around

Ya set up looks nice Joey :thumbsup: hopefully you dont get my spot on the dyno haha had boost leaks with mine last Thursday so gotta go back AGAIN once i fix it pinch.gif

Yea the work he does is great, really happy with it

I'll be onto yavuz and putting the pressure on to get it done :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...