Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, Firstly, i recently bought my first skyline, a 96 R33 GTST series 2. The only mods it has is a cat back exhaust, bov, and a switch to make it run on 7psi instead of the 5/7 @ 4500rpm (although the difference between it being on and off i cant even notice) and it has 131xxx km on the clock (whether they are real or not who knows, although it does feel like a car with low km's the way it drives etc)

Prior to owning the skyline, i had a 5L SS and before that a fairly modded up WRX. The wrx went like a rocket, especially compared to the skyline. Ive always loved skylines, so even though mine is stock as, im pretty happy to have one now. I am pretty stoked with the car, it seems to run well and nothing seems to be worn out. everything is tight, no vibrations, no noises anywhere, engines runs very smooth.

My only issue is, it really doesnt go that quick. I mean stock, i didnt have much expectations, but to me it doesnt feel like it pulls any harder then my 5L VT anchor. I did some searching on the forums, and i couldnt really find much information regarding stock turbo's only naturally aspirated.

So my question really is, are they just not that quick stock? Did i have higher expectations then i should have? I think the part i notice most is when boost comes on its like it doesnt even really take off, i hear the spool etc but it doesnt get up and go like id expect. When comparing this to my wrx, the wrx would fly like a bat out of hell. Although it was relatively modded, i had expected to have a bit more balls, especially on boost.

Edited by deadweight

Yeh, they are nothing special stock, thats why most people get a good full exhaust, FMIC, manual boost controller, possibly larger fuel pump, cam gears and a ecu programmed or controllable ecu (Powerfc) and it will get you on or close to 200rwkw instead of about 150rwkw.

After that it gets pretty expensive (Turbo, Injectors, possibly bigger fuel pump, afm... list goes on), but the power increases alot with larger turbo.

I think you'll find your 5L had alot more torque then the skyline, which is what makes it feel faster.

as above, they aren't exactly rockets. bog stock they do the 1/4 mile as fast as my v6 magna did (high 14's). with a few simply mods (exhaust, cooler and boost increase) you can easily knock a second off that time.

as for the lack of tack off when they come on boost, they run a pretty small, ball bearing turbo, so they come on boost pretty early and smoothly, so they have more low end power and don't have the sudden kick of power like a car with a bush bearing turbo, or a larger turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...