Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

How much power do you want? How much money do you plan to spend?

1. Get a high flow filter for your airbox.

2. Get a 3in exhaust from the turbo back (up to 300kw) or bigger if you want more.

3. get a Nistune chip or aftermarket computer such as a Link and find a good tuner.

4. Bigger turbo, injectors, new fuel pump

5. Beefed up auto or change to manual with a good clutch

Better rotors, pads, Motul RBF600 brake fluid, braided lines, mastercylinder stopper.

Better sway bars, lower with Bilstein shocks, better tyres (and wheels).

That should keep you busy and poor!

not shure on how much i want 500-600+ maybe ;) right now there is not much money to spend :(

How much power do you want? How much money do you plan to spend?

1. Get a high flow filter for your airbox.

2. Get a 3in exhaust from the turbo back (up to 300kw) or bigger if you want more.

3. get a Nistune chip or aftermarket computer such as a Link and find a good tuner.

4. Bigger turbo, injectors, new fuel pump

5. Beefed up auto or change to manual with a good clutch

Better rotors, pads, Motul RBF600 brake fluid, braided lines, mastercylinder stopper.

Better sway bars, lower with Bilstein shocks, better tyres (and wheels).

That should keep you busy and poor!

not shure on how much i want 500-600+ maybe ;) right now there is not much money to spend :(

500-600hp ?!?. It's achievable, but will set you back a fair bit of coin. That's fully built rb25 with serious bolt-ons or rb30 territory, probably set you back a minimum of $15k.

To give you an idea I sunk about $6k-$7k worth of bolt-ons into my stagea and I'm only just at the 400hp mark. My engine is still unopened but id expect to pay the same amount again to get it built.

You should search for the stagea dyno thread or go over to the forced induction section and have a look through the RB25 dyno thread, should he able to get a fair idea of what mod combinations give what results.

thanks man I really appreciate the help :) I'll check this out and see what I can get for answer :)

500-600hp ?!?. It's achievable, but will set you back a fair bit of coin. That's fully built rb25 with serious bolt-ons or rb30 territory, probably set you back a minimum of $15k.

To give you an idea I sunk about $6k-$7k worth of bolt-ons into my stagea and I'm only just at the 400hp mark. My engine is still unopened but id expect to pay the same amount again to get it built.

You should search for the stagea dyno thread or go over to the forced induction section and have a look through the RB25 dyno thread, should he able to get a fair idea of what mod combinations give what results.

cmon, 500-600hp should not be hard to achieve, but only with money. on stock, you should be able to hit just above 300hp atw.

but at the 500-600hp you need to basically start from scratch. entire rebuild on your motor, balancing, reco your head etc.

i am also willing to get to those numbers but only in a couple of years. i will be changing to a rb25 twin turbo setup though. i will be trying to run twin rb25 turbos just to see what i can get.

first things firs, im getting my turbo cores replaced with new ones and alloy/steel wheels but staying at stock specs, no highflow. then a nice new headgasket setup.

i already have FMI, power fc and full exhaust and currently trying to mod rb26 manifolds to fit t3 turbos and rb25 head.

but there will be a heap of money spent through out the next couple of months/years

500hp fly is only about 250rwkw and you wont get 300kw with just those mods on a 25, but you will be in the 200's (still pretty darn quick)!

There is no way 500fwhp is only 250rwkw, that would mean that the drive line is sucking up 120kw. If you go off the stock setup 206fwkw, averages out to be about 150rwkw, that's only 56kw in driveline losses. So off a 500hp/370kw engine I'd expect to see just over 300rwkw as wolverine said.

It also comes down to the mods you pick, most people don't want to sacrifice response for more power, and you can only really have one or the other on a 2.5l engine. If your willing to sacrifice response and throw on a larger turbo there is no reason why you can't push through the 300rwkw mark with relatively minimal mods. Getting to the 400rwkw mark is a whole other story.

Edited by QWK32

500hp fly is only about 250rwkw and you wont get 300kw with just those mods on a 25, but you will be in the 200's (still pretty darn quick)!

Really?!

There is around 60kw drivetrain loss +/- a few (or about 80hp).

GT3076 is a 500hp turbo with supporting mods will make 300rwkw on 98ron.

500hp = 367kw

It seems to add up to me.

A quick scan of the RB25 dyno thread will show some actual results.

Sorry (well not really) but im calling BS, there is no way in the known universe that your driveline is ~ 85% efficient! Just not possible, and an AWD system is less efficient & auto less again, you can easily experience a 40% loss of transmitable power! Its not a liner scale either, much like the efficiency of a turbo isnt one of linearity, the driveline is no different only not so dramatic. Stock is not 150kw at the wheels either! Yeah 300kw is possible from an un opened rb25, but not with the limited mods you posed earlier, with all supporting mods yeah, but it would not be cheap & it would be a time bomb! 260rs does it much easier, but still not cheap! Im building a 700hp+ fly rb30 at the moment, power is expensive, especially if you want it to be consistant and actually last any great length of time! My s1 stagea (yep non-neo so down alittle bit, but) with a full 3" HKS Hi Power exhaust with 100cell metal cat, HKS split dump, custom low mount mani, HKS pod, Blitz LM FMIC, HKS EVC4, HKS AFR and a few other mods @ 9psi made 153awkw & 555nm on 98ron! Most people grossly over estimate the power they can achieve & equally underestimate the cost! Ive spent twice what i paid for my car, on my engine so far and its not even in the car yet!

There is no way 500fwhp is only 250rwkw, that would mean that the drive line is sucking up 120kw. If you go off the stock setup 206fwkw, averages out to be about 150rwkw, that's only 56kw in driveline losses. So off a 500hp/370kw engine I'd expect to see just over 300rwkw as wolverine said.

Mate, what I mean is, review your maths ^. 206kw at the crank is ~276hp, your stating 150awkw (or are you driving a rwd stagea?), which is ~201bhp, so theres a 75hp drop, stock (thats a >27% loss)! Now your nearly doubling the power to 500chp ~373kw. So lets just assume you have a magic gear box and its efficency is linear, the estimated power (using 27% loss) would be 272awkw or 365bhp; a 135hp/101kw loss! Thats still away off 300awkw & then account for additional losses; my estimate is looking pretty good!

:merli:

*edited for grammer & a rounding error! lol

Edited by Zorro

why would anyone upgrade/ downgrade to a rb26 from a neo motor? the neo motor is much more revised, plus shares heaps of parts with the rb26. besides the ecu being able to run twin airflows and o2 sensors. only thing you cant use from rb motors is the pistons which the r33 rb25 and the rb26 share. i still say the rb25 neo beats the rb26. also didnt the awd stageas get a rb26 equivalent block just not coded 05u since we have the awd pan and the neo block didnt fit the awd pan? so technically block, rods and cams are interchangeable/same. were just missing 100cc.

Sorry (well not really) but im calling BS, there is no way in the known universe that your driveline is ~ 85% efficient! Just not possible, and an AWD system is less efficient & auto less again, you can easily experience a 40% loss of transmitable power! Its not a liner scale either, much like the efficiency of a turbo isnt one of linearity, the driveline is no different only not so dramatic. Stock is not 150kw at the wheels either! Yeah 300kw is possible from an un opened rb25, but not with the limited mods you posed earlier, with all supporting mods yeah, but it would not be cheap & it would be a time bomb! 260rs does it much easier, but still not cheap! Im building a 700hp+ fly rb30 at the moment, power is expensive, especially if you want it to be consistant and actually last any great length of time! My s1 stagea (yep non-neo so down alittle bit, but) with a full 3" HKS Hi Power exhaust with 100cell metal cat, HKS split dump, custom low mount mani, HKS pod, Blitz LM FMIC, HKS EVC4, HKS AFR and a few other mods @ 9psi made 153awkw & 555nm on 98ron! Most people grossly over estimate the power they can achieve & equally underestimate the cost! Ive spent twice what i paid for my car, on my engine so far and its not even in the car yet!

OP says 500hp then a 500hp turbo will get him there. Do you agree with that?? (ignore the slippery slope that is drivetrain losses and has been argued to death in forced induction since 2003)

GT3076 with bigger fuel pump, bigger injectors FMIC, 3" exhaust, FMIC, engine management + tuning is limited? In what way? What else is needed?

Going over 500hp with a stock engine generally becomes far less reliable so the costs start stacking up over this level and you won't get an argument from me on that. Tuning needs to be fatter and less aggressive to keep well away from det.

I have owned an R33 since 2001 and the Stagea for quite a while too. I strongly doubt you have spent more on them than I have over that time.

To get your 700hp is an expensive road to go down there is no question that engine internals, balancing and presumably a good look at the head is needed to get a reliable result. Then you open the door to drivetrain issues and the spending mounts up quickly.

On drivetrain losses, I believe you are making a mistake if you trying to use % loss. This has been argued back and forth in forced induction. Consistently the S1 GTS-t's make around 125-130rwkw in stock form (ignoring some outlying dyno variation). It shows around 60kw loss. AWD Nissans generally show around 10kw additional loss in AWD vs 2WD but there isn't as much in it as people think. Auto losses are definitely higher. Most cars show largely fixed loss (and if you don't believe me dyno a car before and after NOS and see what happens) but it makes sense that the harder you push the car the more will be lost to friction etc. IMO there is a fixed loss with a slight increasing % change at higher power levels.

Getting back to the OP's goal 500hp fly is easily achievable. If using a slushbox that needs to be looked at.

Mate, what I mean is, review your maths ^. 206kw at the crank is ~276hp, your stating 150awkw (or are you driving a rwd stagea?), which is ~201bhp, so theres a 75hp drop, stock (thats a >27% loss)! Now your nearly doubling the power to 500chp ~373kw. So lets just assume you have a magic gear box and its efficency is linear, the estimated power (using 27% loss) would be 272awkw or 365bhp; a 135hp/101kw loss! Thats still away off 300awkw & then account for additional losses; my estimate is looking pretty good!

:merli:

*edited for grammer & a rounding error! lol

Drivetrain losses are fairly linear. And 25%-30% loss is about right (even though a percentage means it's not linear but I did say fairly). Modern cars are losing way less than that these days, even with autos behind them.

this is the equation for my 260rs

step 3 RB28 + full tomei head + garrett gtx4294r @ 18psi + BP98 = 600rwhp + ~$50000 later

i cant see getting to those power levels on a neo being much less expensive than that. but llike someone said earlier with outright power comes lag i mine doesnt hit full boost til 6k but its a handful of fun when it does :D

just my 2 cents and experience in chasing power in a stagea

Mate, what I mean is, review your maths ^. 206kw at the crank is ~276hp, your stating 150awkw (or are you driving a rwd stagea?), which is ~201bhp, so theres a 75hp drop, stock (thats a >27% loss)! Now your nearly doubling the power to 500chp ~373kw. So lets just assume you have a magic gear box and its efficency is linear, the estimated power (using 27% loss) would be 272awkw or 365bhp; a 135hp/101kw loss! Thats still away off 300awkw & then account for additional losses; my estimate is looking pretty good!

:merli:

*edited for grammer & a rounding error! lol

i don't believe that you can attach a % to drivetrain losses, i believe it does slightly increase as the power does but nowhere near the levels your saying, that is a lot of power being lost as heat. i've been involved in one of these drivetrain losses arguments on here before and after 10 pages of comments everyone was still in disagreement lol

150awkw is about the average for a stock S2 NEO stagea, yes some people do see less though.

i have been running my 400rwhp setup for 3 years now, daily driven car, and its still going strong. my mods are only very minimal with an exhaust, intercooler, boost controller, ecu, injectors and the one mods that really counts, a GT3582 pumping out 1.5bar. i have sacrificed a bit of response and have easily made a lot of power up top. i am starting to get concerned about the auto but its held up really well considering the only mod i've done to it is a valve body upgrade.

Edited by QWK32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...