Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

guys, hope someone can shed some light on my problem.

engine specs: RB26 (Stock)

GT40R BB Turbo

Power FC D-Jetro with ID 725cc injectors

problem is that, no matter the amt of inj duty% I input , the A/F ratio remains 12.2 - 12.3 from 7000 - 7600 rpm. low to med loads are ok.

car is running 15psi.

I am thinking maybe a vacum leak, but the car idles @ 850 rpm steady. On WOT, I am seeing a pim voltage of 3.5v.

what you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381656-fueling-problem/
Share on other sites

ID injectors, the best high imp injectors on the market. (IMO no flaming please)

How did you wire these babys up?

Just wondering.. but....

You just installed them in the stockers place right?

Do me a favour, measure the resistance across the stock GTR injector you took out and then those ID injectors you put in.

Can you see a problem there?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381656-fueling-problem/#findComment-6086634
Share on other sites

ID injectors, the best high imp injectors on the market. (IMO no flaming please)

How did you wire these babys up?

Just wondering.. but....

You just installed them in the stockers place right?

Do me a favour, measure the resistance across the stock GTR injector you took out and then those ID injectors you put in.

Can you see a problem there?

bypass the resistor box , since they are high impedence. the stock inj. are low impedence.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381656-fueling-problem/#findComment-6086660
Share on other sites

You've really given us f**k all to work with.

We need more information, like power, all mods, not just a half assed post leaving us guessing.

For all we know this engine could be fitted to a monster truck.

Car is being street tune. as for mods, read the thread again. if it really matters, car is making about 350 whp. ran it against a r33 with 400whp (dyno tune), and was right behind his bumper.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381656-fueling-problem/#findComment-6087857
Share on other sites

Have you measured the voltage at the pump?

Are the 725 ID's going to be big enough?

gonna get a fuel pressure gauge and check for pressure drop. did not really suspected this, since everything is new (nismo pump, nismo regulator, ID Inj., fuel rail, fuel filter, turbo etc.)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381656-fueling-problem/#findComment-6087946
Share on other sites

I just thought with a GT40 you would need a fair bit of flow, I have hit over 80% on the 1000's with a GTX3071 on eflex.

You may be reaching the limits of your pump, depending how you have it mounted and if the sock is close to the bottom of the tank? I found too with more torque, more fuel is required for similar power output.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381656-fueling-problem/#findComment-6088146
Share on other sites

So I was right all along.

I had this exact problem but you were slowly feeding us scraps with the mods, car type, etc then smartassed me about "reading your scaps" so I gave up helping.

Anyway, glad its solved. Next time you post a thread, post absolutely everything about the car.

Not - "fuel pump maxed out"

"can't be, it's a nismo"

Well, it was, and yes, it was maxed out. Due to low voltage.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381656-fueling-problem/#findComment-6098011
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...