Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is an excerpt from the Haltech website about fuel requirements and power levels.

If you can estimate the power output of a gasoline engine, you can make a reasonable guess at the fuel

flow requirement. A simple rule of thumb, thus, may be expressed in metric or imperial units.

Note: Every 100 hp needs around 50 lb/hr (8.0 US gal/hr) of fuel

(6.6 Imp gal/hr)

Every 100 kW needs around 670 cc/min (40 L/hr) of fuel

This assumes a brake specific fuel consumption of 0.50. The actual fuel flow necessary by injectors and

pump are likely to exceed a figure derived this way. This is due to the overheads in injector dead time and

pumping return fuel to maintain regulation.

I worked backwards with these figures and with my 910 cc injectors at 68 percent my power level came in at 554kw. This is at the flywheel I assume.

This seems a tad high. Who here can fill in some more information to get a more accurate power figure?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382090-power-level-for-rb25det/
Share on other sites

Rough rule of thumb is 1cc per hp

Thats when working out what size injectors you need.

Working out power by injector duty, is a very rough guestimate at best as just a couple of degrees of timing either way will affect it pretty badly, same with AFR's / VE etc

My suggestion is take it to the 'Plex and see what the trap speed it ;)

Yeah I knew there would be a lot in the afr and the timing. I guess I better get it down the strip hey. I think the clutch might let it down a bit but I should get through there pretty quick. Top of 4th is 125mph. That's what it would do I spose.

All depends on if you actually get to the top end of 4th, and what RPM is used.

You can actually hit the limiter and still see a MPH increase in some instances, just depends how hard it hits.

Doesn't take a genius to workout though that the car doesn't have 554kw @ the fly with a GT35 so the figures provided initially are wrong, or the calculations are.

But ye for a RB 1hp = 1cc using the stock reg (for most intents/purposes). E85 obviously confuses this as do pressure adjustments.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The incentives are mostly the same, yes. Ethanol is cheap compared to the cost of doing 98-100 RON with crude oil alone. 87 to 93-94 AKI all with E10. In 2020 Canada mandated E10 as a part of their "renewable fuel standard" and is supposedly going to go to E15 in 2030. In California where there are only 8 refineries with two threatening to shut down next year it's been over 20 years now of E10 and 91 AKI maximum because there's just not enough refinery capacity or crude oil supply relative to the demand for premium unleaded fuel. And CARB's low carbon fuel standard means functionally none of the diesel available at the pump is made from crude oil anymore. It's almost all entirely 20% biodiesel blended with 80% renewable diesel (hydrotreated vegetable oil) now. The number of gasoline vehicles that support E15 or higher ethanol concentrations is surprisingly low, I can't imagine it being wise to play tricks like this without flex fuel sensors in most of the fleet.
    • It's almost certainly the same as the one next to it. Have a fish around amongst these hits https://www.google.com/search?q=surface+mount+transistor+m33&sca_esv=9cb49794e0b2005d&source=hp&ei=2vJ5aNjTB7Kw0PEPldnS8QM&iflsig=AOw8s4IAAAAAaHoA6qkfmF6XcygtrZ4Vu9f92NXF_RFd&ved=0ahUKEwjYqIPP7MWOAxUyGDQIHZWsND4Q4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=surface+mount+transistor+m33&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IhxzdXJmYWNlIG1vdW50IHRyYW5zaXN0b3IgbTMzMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigAUjKCFAAWABwAHgAkAEAmAHfAaAB3wGqAQMyLTG4AQPIAQD4AQL4AQGYAgGgAuYBmAMAkgcDMi0xoAfMBLIHAzItMbgH5gHCBwMyLTHIBwU&sclient=gws-wiz
    • South Australia, which is hardly as far behind as the rest pf Oz makes out, and who is also not a paragon of progressiveness (read that as over-legislation) in the area of vehicle standards, has this to say on the subject: Adjustable coil-over suspension Aftermarket adjustable coil-over suspension components are suspension units that incorporate an external thread on the main body and corresponding threaded spring saddle that allows the vehicle's suspension height to be varied. If fitting aftermarket or coil-over suspension components you must submit an Application to modify a light motor vehicle form and a report from a light vehicle engineering signatory (LVES).
    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • Those above shitboxes, mediocre and above usually have a turbo strapped to them, hence the slightly higher octane is required.  
×
×
  • Create New...