Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

With the new F1 season fast approaching so too is the launch of the Sky Sports F1 HD dedicated F1 channel, which will take viewers to the next level.

From launch, Sky Sports F1 TM HD will give viewers:

EVERY RACE LIVE: From March to November, every moment of each race will be live in HD, without the interruption of adverts.

LIVE PRACTICE and QUALIFYING: Every practice and qualifying session for each Grand Prix will be shown live on one channel, Sky Sports F1 TM HD

THE FULL SEASON IN-DEPTH: Over nine full months, viewers will have a wealth of programmes with in-depth interviews, archive action and weekly magazine shows.

EXTRA LIVE CONTENT: Through Sky's interactive service, fans can follow the action through on-board cameras, go behind the scenes with the teams in the pits, and follow race data, to take them further inside the sport.

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/7526826/Sky-HD-Ultimate-F1-Experience

wow..........

Will also subscribe to foxtel solely for the above skysports coverage if it's offered.. The AFL made me think about signing up, but this will seal the deal.

Not having to listen to that elf eared muppet and his sidekicks would just be a bonus

No mention of The Iceman bris?

Disappointing.

Kimi will be Kimi if he wins a race or not he will be there...it will be more interesting to see how the new upstart goes :) I will be rooting for Grosjean to hand it to him. BIG ask, and I dont think it will happen but Grosjean is in a great position to show whether he is a good driver or a little bit special as he grows through the year.

And really want to know what One have planned for 2012...I rang Foxtel the other week and they didnt have a clue what was happening with F1 coverage in 2012 :(

Well plenty to watch and root for this year. Grosjen at Renault. Senna in Williams. Disco Dan at STR. Petrov at Caterham and of course Webz be VeTool. As long as Hackilton eats armco and carbon fibre as much as he gags on cock 2012 will be a great year :thumbsup:

Nailed it.

I put $5 on webber to win. Nothing big but makes it a bit more interesting.

Also saw on the carsales website that Mercedes has somthing in store for Schumi, but it doesnt really say what it is. Any idea? Any point on putting money on him to win?

http://www.carsales.com.au/news/2012/sports/mercedesbenz/motorsport-something-special-for-schumi-28866

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...