Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I live in hope that every day that passes with no Williams announcement means they may get a decent pilot for next year. Fine to keep Faildanado for the occassional race where he is quick but Senna needs to go and truly hope that they get a good pilot in there. Not much really available other than Jaimie or perhaps Di Resta...but think back to what a shame that Kimi went to Lotus and not Williams. Lotus are doing well but Kimi would have been more competitive in the Williams..just

i doubt it, lotus are more consistant in their finishings, williams are lucky they won that 1 race and apart from that, all their finishings are scattered all over the grid.

Kimi is bound to have a win or two before the seasons over, well at least i hope he does :P

hoping the new wing helps him this race.

with webber fastest. ;)

01 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:32.493 33 laps

02 Lewis Hamilton McLaren 1:32.707 0.214 31 laps

03 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:32.836 0.343 37 laps

04 Nico Hulkenberg Force India 1:32.987 0.494 29 laps

05 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:33.093 0.600 28 laps

06 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:33.107 0.614 35 laps

07 Jenson Button McLaren 1:33.349 0.856 21 laps

08 Bruno Senna Williams 1:33.499 1.006 34 laps

09 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:33.614 1.121 31 laps

10 Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1:33.750 1.257 13 laps

11 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:33.866 1.373 18 laps

12 Sergio Perez Sauber 1:33.903 1.410 35 laps

13 Kamui Kobayashi Sauber 1:33.983 1.490 32 laps

14 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:34.291 1.798 12 laps

15 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:34.300 1.807 32 laps

16 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:34.863 2.370 31 laps

17 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:35.080 2.587 33 laps

18 Heikki Kovalainen Caterham 1:35.711 3.218 40 laps

19 Vitaly Petrov Caterham 1:35.870 3.377 37 laps

20 Timo Glock Marussia 1:36.194 3.701 31 laps

21 Charles Pic Marussia 1:36.636 4.143 28 laps

22 Pedro de la Rosa HRT 1:37.342 4.849 30 laps

23 Narain Karthikeyan HRT 1:37.701 5.208 35 laps

Paul di Resta Force India 2 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8139665/Webber-Edges-Hamilton-In-Second-Prac

Lotus has ruled out using its double-DRS system during the remainder of the Japanese Grand Prix weekend after testing it in practice.

Raikkonen ran the double-DRS in opening practice at Suzuka, but the team has ruled out using it on Saturday or Sunday as it was unable to make it switch effectively.

"It worked a little bit but we are not going to run it," said Raikkonen.

"Plus we had some other issues during the running so it didn't help again to get the best idea. But it is not going to suddenly make us win if it worked 100 per cent."

Raikkonen admitted the device was also making the car harder to set up.

"It seems to be," he added. "I think you have to ask the team, but it started well the first time we tried it, and with all the things that were going on it hasn't been as easy as we had hoped, but we are learning with it."

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/103099

Times

1 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:32.136 17 laps

2 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:32.371 0.235 20 laps

3 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:32.824 0.688 13 laps

4 Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1:32.918 0.782 23 laps

5 Sergio Perez Sauber 1:32.920 0.784 18 laps

6 Kamui Kobayashi Sauber 1:32.924 0.788 15 laps

7 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:33.008 0.872 20 laps

8 Jenson Button McLaren 1:33.025 0.889 16 laps

9 Paul di Resta Force India 1:33.094 0.958 17 laps

10 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:33.160 1.024 16 laps

11 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:33.184 1.048 13 laps

12 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:33.224 1.088 14 laps

13 Lewis Hamilton McLaren 1:33.569 1.433 14 laps

14 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:33.722 1.586 18 laps

15 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:33.899 1.763 23 laps

16 Bruno Senna Williams 1:33.984 1.848 19 laps

17 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:34.023 1.887 19 laps

18 Nico Hulkenberg Force India 1:34.369 2.233 11 laps

19 Heikki Kovalainen Caterham 1:35.568 3.432 19 laps

20 Vitaly Petrov Caterham 1:36.355 4.219 18 laps

21 Timo Glock Marussia 1:36.389 4.253 11 laps

22 Charles Pic Marussia 1:36.517 4.381 17 laps

23 Narain Karthikeyan HRT 1:36.649 4.513 12 laps

24 Pedro de la Rosa HRT 1:36.875 4.739 16 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8142093/Vettel-Edges-Webber-In-Final-Practice

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...