Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

Well having dramas again with unsure weather its the AFM meter again or not? I had no pod on the AFM meter before and killed the AFM (totally my fault) an now I have a pod adapot and a pod filter on it, you go to plant your foot down and I hit around 5000rpm and it's like the brakes ate being slammed on, pulls right back at me? Any idea what this is caused by? I am goin to put the standard air box back on but my other recent turbo cars I have done this and never had any issue with it? Also I blocked the bov of to make it flutter also any problems with doing this or anything? Let me know guys?

Regards

Matthew :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/384374-stagea-5000rpm-problems/
Share on other sites

What model stagea? How much boost? Etc...

The first thing that comes to mind is airflow cut. If its a C34 S2 you could also be hitting the factory overboost protection.

Blocking the BOV will only cause stalling when backing off, it's a pain in the ass with an auto. If your not getting any stalling then don't worry about it. The only other things is you will get the occasional backfire.

Ive read somewhere on here that there's a glitch in the standard ecu map between 4500-5000rpm

yeah there is, not really a glitch but more like a big dip in the timing. if your hitting those cells it will feel like a flat spot in acceleration, and the more airflow or boost you run on the stock map the more you will feel it.

Also it's a standard boost m35 2003 model no mods done at all apart from pod and it doesn't like it lol

Hi Mathew,

factory airbox is way better than a pod, as I guess you've worked out, lol. You can get them to work, but why bother when the airbox & standard filter will flow more air (& colder) at negligible restriction than the engine will most likely ever need.

Cheers, Leon.

I've got a pod on mine. Required nothing to get it to work, just a filter adaptor for a 350Z.

Leon, when you say an airbox and standard filter will flow more air, have you tested it? On mine I had a significant increase in AFM voltage on the informeter when I put the pod on. Somewhere around 0.5V (which I thought was a lot when it only goes up to 5V, works out to 10%). Considering I had a Blitz panel filter and the powerduct cover removed I wouldn't have thought it would have given me that big an increase.

Temps seem ok too. Intake temp while moving is typically around 30 degrees. While stationary you do get some head soak depending on the ambient temp and how long you're sitting there, but when I complete the setup I'll put some head shielding up.

Mine has no issue, but the injectors were maxing out before the ECU rejiggered itself. I only had the pod, no suction pipe.

The only difference I can think of is the dump pipe and exhaust? I had all mine done by then.

What kind of pod are you using Matthew?

Yeh i do not want to use the standard air box becuase with the pod it spools up so much louder, seems alot less restricted and temps still seem very good. I think i may have worked out the problem, i made my own custom pod adaptor (boilmaker) and i used 75mm piping. but it was 80mm long, like went like 80mm inside in the pod, so i think it was restricting the air flow in, so by cutting it back to like 30mm it will allow the WHOLE to do it job, rather than just the top and sort of forcing the induction through the AFM??

Its a dual POD like the top and also the side, its a decent one...

Ok a couple of things, if I've understood you properly...

The Pod adaptor should be 80mm diameter, not 75mm.

Dual POD? Like an RB26? But you've only got one turbo...

Can you show us a pic?

Leon, when you say an airbox and standard filter will flow more air, have you tested it?

You may have misunderstood my post. It reads as one long sentence. To paraphrase, the standard airbox will flow more air than the engine will most likely ever need. But, to make it harder to read (lol), I also inserted that the air will most likely be colder & the extra restriction will be negligible (referring to std airbox).

I have no doubt a pod filter can flow more air (I admit that change on the informeter is surprisingly large Ryan), but at what cost? More flow generally equals less filtration (no such thing as a free lunch). It's a matter of weighing up risk v's reward I guess.

I've read lots of tests that show pod filters often provide no measurable gain, so I'd rather spend my $100 on something else. I wouldn't mind being proven wrong (before & after dyno tests anyone?) but I don't want to risk my engine ingesting dust & grit for the sake of a few kW (I live in the country remember). For an extra 10+rwkw maybe I would; but I'd be dreaming if I thought that was realistic.

Having voiced my opinion, I understand people spend more money on an exhaust because they like the sound, so if the extra induction/turbo noise puts a smile on your face, than that's cool :thumbsup: .

Hey guys

Well having dramas again with unsure weather its the AFM meter again or not? I had no pod on the AFM meter before and killed the AFM (totally my fault) an now I have a pod adapot and a pod filter on it, you go to plant your foot down and I hit around 5000rpm and it's like the brakes ate being slammed on, pulls right back at me? Any idea what this is caused by? I am goin to put the standard air box back on but my other recent turbo cars I have done this and never had any issue with it? Also I blocked the bov of to make it flutter also any problems with doing this or anything? Let me know guys?

Regards

Matthew :)

Sounds like you are hitting Boost Cut.. This is when the AFM has a voltage reading of 4.85v or over for any amount of time (on the stock ECU) , the ECU will cut boost and fuel to protect the motor.

It feels very much like the brakes have been applied very quickly.

You may have misunderstood my post. It reads as one long sentence. To paraphrase, the standard airbox will flow more air than the engine will most likely ever need. But, to make it harder to read (lol), I also inserted that the air will most likely be colder & the extra restriction will be negligible (referring to std airbox).

I have no doubt a pod filter can flow more air (I admit that change on the informeter is surprisingly large Ryan), but at what cost? More flow generally equals less filtration (no such thing as a free lunch). It's a matter of weighing up risk v's reward I guess.

I've read lots of tests that show pod filters often provide no measurable gain, so I'd rather spend my $100 on something else. I wouldn't mind being proven wrong (before & after dyno tests anyone?) but I don't want to risk my engine ingesting dust & grit for the sake of a few kW (I live in the country remember). For an extra 10+rwkw maybe I would; but I'd be dreaming if I thought that was realistic.

Having voiced my opinion, I understand people spend more money on an exhaust because they like the sound, so if the extra induction/turbo noise puts a smile on your face, than that's cool :thumbsup: .

Haha right that makes more sense Leon. I've read many a conflicting report on pod filters and their filtration, and haven't worked it out entirely myself. But I had the K&N pod kicking around, and thought I'd try it as an experiment. It's worked kind of well, except that with the ECU relearning its hammered by fuel economy. On the plus side it does give me room for a catch can and easy access to my HID ballasts :thumbsup:

That, and the Fcon should allow me to tune around any issues. If I've got the setup to make use of that extra airflow then I'm pretty keen to do so. Suction pipe will be next on the list!

Sounds like you are hitting Boost Cut.. This is when the AFM has a voltage reading of 4.85v or over for any amount of time (on the stock ECU) , the ECU will cut boost and fuel to protect the motor.

It feels very much like the brakes have been applied very quickly.

I think I was measuring 4.86V after I put mine on, so that would be about right I'm guessing.

Had pod setups on most of my cars to date.......great on the track and freeway......shit on a town car......just remember there is a temp sensor in the afm with our car so the more heat the crapper it will run.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...