Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

did you get in and qualify for the higher tariff rebates (solar) before Sept 30 Andrew?

I've got a 3.0 kw system coming early next year as my power bill is not far off yours.....problem with home office....I should go out on the road more often cause everything is on when I'm home

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Haha - you should try on my last power bill - $2,400 for the QUARTER. Yes, you read right. But you get that with a big house with a 12kw reverse cycle a/c running almost 24 hours a day, many plasma/tvs on all day, home office with at least 2 pcs running all day, outdoor electric spa ..... I should own my own power company.

suprised you didnt get pinged for a hydro lab investigation , using that much power. fark, you need some solar for sure a paddock full of panels haha

Nah haven't put the solar on yet Pete - and I could never produce more than I use, so the feed-in tariff is null and void. We had priced up and were just about to go with a $20k 5kw Conergy system when I got hit with a $21,500 run-off insurance bill from winding up my company and going on as staff with work, so that wiped out the spare $20k I had put aside .... but early next year we will put a 5kw system on to help with the bills.

And yes Troy, thankfully haven't had the cops sniffing around for a hydro setup .... with the amount of power we use I am surprised we haven't been flagged.

Nah haven't put the solar on yet Pete - and I could never produce more than I use, so the feed-in tariff is null and void. We had priced up and were just about to go with a $20k 5kw Conergy system when I got hit with a $21,500 run-off insurance bill from winding up my company and going on as staff with work, so that wiped out the spare $20k I had put aside .... but early next year we will put a 5kw system on to help with the bills.

And yes Troy, thankfully haven't had the cops sniffing around for a hydro setup .... with the amount of power we use I am surprised we haven't been flagged.

That really bites. The solar stuff was supposed to help not hinder. My dads got 5kva of panels. Takes note of what he goes/uses and all that. Hes a bit mad. But with a big house we end up using it all one way or another...

Solar would work better if the panels were cheaper - they will be in 5 yrs time when the new construction methods come into effect (and they'll have 2-3 times the energy generation per square inch too).

Sadly its not getting cheaper. ;(

-D

Yeah there was a story on the news a few months back about how they have cracked some new technology where they can get about 200W out of a panel that is the size of an A4 piece of paper, rather than the conventional size panels you see today. It will make roofs a LOT less ugly! But yeah the price is currently still pretty insane.

Just back to the topic of speeding for moment here.

My usual 40 odd km trip into work sees me driving past 3 fixed speed cameras. And once every week or 2, usuall on Monday, I'll pass a mobile camera too. So let's say, at worst, I drive through 1 camera every 10km.

Tonight, on top of the usual 3 fixed, I drove through an additional 4 mobiles. 1 camera every 5.7km...

How the f**k is that kind of camera density necessary? How is it anything other than blatant revenue raising?

How the f**k is that kind of camera density necessary? How is it anything other than blatant revenue raising?

Its not. Its stupidity mane. I drive 60kph on the needle the 15 minutes it takes me to travel from Hampstead Gdns to Mawson Lakes, get all sorts on mongos overtaking me at 70, driving 50kph in the right hand lane, people who stick to the absolute left hand side of the lane when there is a slip lane to go left, people who wanna turn right, but dont use the slip lane, try and use the racing line, fail miserably and end up holding up the entire outer lines worth of traffic.

Lets face it. Adelaide drivers are shit.

-D

We will eventually have everyone in Adelaide looking at their speedo all time while passing speed cameras and not paying attention to the road !

I know i do when going through an intersection ,

It makes me wonder if anyone has had an accident claim and blamed cameras

due to continuously checking their speedo coming to an intersection or looking back at a speed camera they just passed ?

I reckon that would be an uphill battle.

They'd just turn around and say something like any good driver should be able to maintain a set speed and attention to the road and their surroundings.

Then they'd laugh.

Nah haven't put the solar on yet Pete - and I could never produce more than I use, so the feed-in tariff is null and void. We had priced up and were just about to go with a $20k 5kw Conergy system when I got hit with a $21,500 run-off insurance bill from winding up my company and going on as staff with work, so that wiped out the spare $20k I had put aside .... but early next year we will put a 5kw system on to help with the bills.

And yes Troy, thankfully haven't had the cops sniffing around for a hydro setup .... with the amount of power we use I am surprised we haven't been flagged.

hey mate you didnt send me your bills so kylie can give you a better price for your power and gas.

did you get in and qualify for the higher tariff rebates (solar) before Sept 30 Andrew?

I've got a 3.0 kw system coming early next year as my power bill is not far off yours.....problem with home office....I should go out on the road more often cause everything is on when I'm home

While were on the subject of solar , I was installing and selling solar for a living most companies dont tell you certain things when you buy a system ,

heres a few interesting facts :

The maximum watts you will get out of a 5kw system is 4kws pretty much 80% is all you will get even in perfect conditions on a roof top .

How they get the 5kw figure is calculated from the panel numbers which are calculated in a laboratory in perfect conditions

in reality you deal with dust , clouds , atmosphere and heat losses from the panels heating up .

Therefore 1.5kw will max out at 1.1kw so on and so on for 3kw , this will extend the amount of time the system will pay itself off .

I have a 1.5 kw system which saves me $200 a year mainly in summer the rest of the year is a waste of time .

I have had several jobs where i have replaced 4 pinch.gif inverters on the one job because they have self destructed = chinese made rubbish , the other problem with this is most inverters have a 2 year warranty

and i garauntee you will have to buy 1or 2 more inverters in the life of the system @ 3k a piece

The most efficient panel available in the world at the moment is 17% not 95% which they tell you when buying a system , the inverter maybe 95% not the panels

The latest technology is Solar paint , even cars with the paint can create a voltage ?

Just back to the topic of speeding for moment here.

My usual 40 odd km trip into work sees me driving past 3 fixed speed cameras. And once every week or 2, usuall on Monday, I'll pass a mobile camera too. So let's say, at worst, I drive through 1 camera every 10km.

Tonight, on top of the usual 3 fixed, I drove through an additional 4 mobiles. 1 camera every 5.7km...

How the f**k is that kind of camera density necessary? How is it anything other than blatant revenue raising?

Speeding fines are blatant revenue raising mate. No matter how many camera's you put up, people who want to speed will end up speeding and risking others lives. Govt f**ked up their budget so they need money from somewhere, and they can't jack the taxes up by a lot. The Govt actually budgets on getting xx amount of dollars from speed fines etc.

Yesterday I followed the alcohol testing bus police vehicle to victor harbor, after a night on the jacks, i was sitting on just over 100 in the 100 zones and he lost me- he stuck to 100 in the 80 zones also--just goes to show how much the speed limits are there for safety when even the police ignore them. Clearly revenue raising- Have to pay gillards 90g pay increase somehow-

Ive been telling people about the min 30% water increase for over a year now, everyone thought eh whatever... well well well. Perks of working at the f**k up of a desalination plant.

Which for the record STILL isnt operational, all the bs on the news... DONT BELIEVE IT. I am yet to hear a single machine or generator start buzzing and pumping anything. The water outlet shaft (returns water back to sea) isnt even connected yet ffs. They did some water testing and what not, made a bunch of cartons of water to prove to people how theyve successfully desalinated water (which no one drinks at the desal, and I have a hard time believing that place made anything).

f**k i hate this state, and this government. Bunch of useless idiots who just want $$$.

Agree with you Marko, they make the public believe that something is happening or is being done when really nothing is getting done. Just feed the public BS to keep everything on the low down.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...