Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

i have just installed an safc 2 into my 96 s2 r33 gtst i have followed the instruction manual from the net. Once i finished wiring , soldering and doing the initial set up i started the car up and noticed that i have 100% throttle, i have continually reseted the safc 2 and also jiggled the wirings but the 100 percentage still did not move , i have been told it must be the settings on the safc 2 itself and not a throttle sensor problem ,

any suggestions ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385797-safc-2-problem/
Share on other sites

hey guys

i have just installed an safc 2 into my 96 s2 r33 gtst i have followed the instruction manual from the net. Once i finished wiring , soldering and doing the initial set up i started the car up and noticed that i have 100% throttle, i have continually reseted the safc 2 and also jiggled the wirings but the 100 percentage still did not move , i have been told it must be the settings on the safc 2 itself and not a throttle sensor problem ,

any suggestions ?

Have you done the proper sensor calibration?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385797-safc-2-problem/#findComment-6153814
Share on other sites

yeh just tried to turn it on but the safc doesnt even start , pulled the thing (safc) apart and found out one of the soleniods or the small circle thing is sorta snapped off inside so the safc is pretty much useless , and so is the thread lol , freakin pissed but

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385797-safc-2-problem/#findComment-6153885
Share on other sites

i dont know but i unplugged the safc 2 from the extended harness and drove down the road and went on limpo mode, found out the airflow wire was doing it so i connected the safc 2 again to avoid the car on limp mode but the safc itself isnt even turned on, the photo i attached shows the circle thing im holding has come off the circuit card , what should i do? i was thinking of getting another safc 2 or can an safc 1 with a harness clip fit to an safc 2 extended harness clip which is already wired in?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385797-safc-2-problem/#findComment-6155243
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Well i just got another safc 2 from a fellow sau member And hooked It up to my existing extended harness which was already connected to my ecu, its still reading 100% throttle and i tried to look through the safc manual on throttle self learn procedure but its very vage .

So can some one (please) give me a step by step on how to do the throttle self learn sequence ?

The settings are on;

Hotwire - 1 / 1 - 1 / 1

6 cyl - arrow up

Anything else i need to set up ? Eg hi-lo throttle settings?

Any help sau

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385797-safc-2-problem/#findComment-6277838
Share on other sites

Yeh i know but might aswell make this work till i get more funds for the next ecu , but i am positive about the wiring , all the wires are soldered in and i have been saving the settings but im pretty sure it might be that i havent done the self learning thing

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385797-safc-2-problem/#findComment-6279676
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...