Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks guys.. Its where the brides side steals the shoes and then at the end of the ceremony demands money from the groom. Its quite funny to watch and photograph at the same time.

I should do a series of all the different shots I have taken from just that scene.

Anyways..

IMG_4876_resize.jpg

IMG_5126_resize.jpg

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That Z shot could have been great, but you put the watermark right through the most critical part of the image: the subject.

I understand the whole issue with people stealing photos and posting them as their own works, but if you've gone to the trouble of making and applying a watermark, take the 10 extra seconds to make a second copy for places (like this forum) where your photo is less likely to be "stolen" by others. Use the version above for when you post to Facebook, etc.

If you've done an event gallery and you're watermark is smack bang in the middle like that people will still rip your image and use on their online galleries anyway. People just don't associate any value to event photography. sad by true. The only time someone really wants a shot is if they want the high res to print it off for a wall somewhere. People are happy with low res watermarked up shit for their fb/blog sites and computer archives.

Besides car owners at events who is really going to steal your image? It's not likely Top Gear are going to steal it for their next cover, and I doubt nissan would want it for a future brochure. I know no-one is likely to steal my amatuer shit, My watermark is more for traffic generation and crediting the shot to me rather than protecting my copyright and ruining my image.

p.s.

6759451055_0ce1c66c60_b.jpg

6758938177_afb917fd6e_b.jpg

6748248269_d0098b273a_b.jpg

Edited by MaTBoY

Not saying you shouldn't mark your work man. Just saying that for most of the time a watermark won't stop someone using it if they want to, and that most of us togs here font need to worry about people stealing our work.

As nick suggested, if you want show off some of your finer shots it might be worth using a less intrusive mark. Keep your super big mark for the event galleries if u think it helps reduce people stealing your shit/increase sales.

I personally dont think his watermark is that bad across the image. Does distract the image but its not that bad.

For anyone saving images on web make sure you save it at 72dpi.

Images get stolen all the time. A good friend of mine had his entire blog posts stolen and several galleries worth of images. He even went as far as taking the watermark out and putting his own on and even describing the wedding day on his own blog. Low life scum.

Check out my thread here on this:

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1141223

wow...ok sorry for posting a photo with a watermark on it.... fyi i have had photos stolen before for advertising purposes.

Scenario:- One of your remarkable photos (with distinct but covert watermark) is uploaded by a company without your permission > Used for their profit > Sue the pants off them

first time in a while ive been able to get outside while the sun sets

20120128-203244_P.JPG

took another a bit later, but missed a few spots. tried to fix it, but its a bit obvious, lol

20120128-203727_P.JPG

Edited by Jay019

Fongy - awesome pics mate. Love the processing as well.

Jay - that pano is just WOW!!! incredible. DUDE seriously print this please and hang it up!!

A random from Saturdays wedding. Haven't gone thru all the pics but posted this teaser one up for them Sunday morning before my early start to another full wedding day:

I did a few proper silhouettes for them, but I like this lighter version as it shows off the dress nicely.

IMG_9263_resize.jpg

Random from yesterdays wedding

Love Indian weddings.. Always filled with colour, lots of dancing, different rituals etc.

So many on lookers not knowing what the hell was going on lol.

IMG_9476_resize.jpg

I shot a friends wedding on Saturday, hired the Nikon 70-200mm F2.8 VRII. Wow, I really felt my left arm after 3 hours, after 7 hours it was oh so sore.

DSC_1703_coloursep.jpg

DSC_1737_coloursep.jpg

DSC_2365sep.jpg

DSC_2535sep.jpg

DSC_1823.jpg

Edited by barraspalding

Jay - that pano is just WOW!!! incredible. DUDE seriously print this please and hang it up!!

cheers man, i would love to have a wide format printer to print stuff like this at home. that would be sweet.

took this quick and dirty 6 shot auto exposure handheld pano today on the way to picking kids up from school.

20120202-142635_P.thumb.JPG

(click click)

If you've done an event gallery and you're watermark is smack bang in the middle like that people will still rip your image and use on their online galleries anyway.

p.s.

6759451055_0ce1c66c60_b.jpg

was just going to quote the post for truth but had to include the photo as well....so beautiful..left it a while before i checked into this thread and regretting it. Some truly awesome stuff in here and it makes me feel pretty silly kicking off a Feb thread with my amateur bumblings. :unsure:

as for the watermark issue, i dont know how to remove the things so if nothing else it stops punks like me uploading it to their facebook car albums..not that im pretending they are mine or anything. Just have a few thousand pics of gorgeous cars i like to share. The 350z could have been one of them...sigh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...