Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

While fitting an immobiliser and turbo timer to my R32 (which finally arrived about 6 weeks ago) I discovered that it has a Mines ECU. Does anyone know where I can get info on them in English or of any tuners in Vic with the means to tune it.

I think all a mines ecu is a standard ecu with a mines chip in it cant be tuned.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38825-mines-ecu/#findComment-786761
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. I'll get my mate to see if he can connect to it then and read it. I know the case is still the standard item and that l the Mines part is just a chip added to the main board but I thought maybe it required Mines software to be able to do any tuning. If we can find out more I will post it here.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38825-mines-ecu/#findComment-786844
Share on other sites

How did you know your car has a mines ecu? I just brought an R32 GTSt over two weeks ago, and discovered that the ecu has pink scribbled writing on it, and there is a mines sticker on the bonnet. Guessing that maybe it has a mines ecu. Do you guys know if these ecus run alright on ultimate or would it be tuned for japans 104 ron fuel?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38825-mines-ecu/#findComment-787032
Share on other sites

How did you know your car has a mines ecu? I just brought an R32 GTSt over two weeks ago, and discovered that the ecu has pink scribbled writing on it, and there is a mines sticker on the bonnet.  Guessing that maybe it has a mines ecu.  Do you guys know if these ecus run alright on ultimate or would it be tuned for japans 104 ron fuel?

Mines ECU's normaly have a mines badge on it. While we are on the subject of tuning has any one ever had a real time tune chip written for their factory ECU. If so how were the results.Cant decide if to get this or a power fc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38825-mines-ecu/#findComment-787157
Share on other sites

My GTR had a Mines computer in it when it arrived.

The ECU had a Mines badge on it and tamper proof stickers to show that it hadn't been opened since leaving the Mines' Workshop.

Anyway, I opened it up and there was a Mines' chip on the board, however it had a great big blob of expoxy resin over the chip preventing it being removed from the socket. In theory it would be possible to carefully solder on a socket from underneath the circuit board if you wanted to read maps, but personally I wouldn't bother.

Basically the differences were that there was no speed cut and the fuel maps were VERY rich. After lifting boost to 1 bar, the AFR came back down to a more realistic level of around 12.5:1, but still resulted in a puff of black smoke when boost came on and some flames from the zaust (no cat then) on rapid throttle off.

Steve from SST saw this actual ECU on his dyno in at least 2 other cars, and he may remember the settings better than me. I doubt that the ignition maps were altered, however, as we were able to advance the CAS 5 degrees to pick up some power without any detonation.

There is a good thread on chip replacment and chip programming - do a search. Personally, I would go the P&P route as ECU's such as Wolf (or used PFC) have never been cheaper and are typically less than the cost of a name brand exhaust. You can always recoup most of the money spent on the ECU by selling it separately when you sell the car, not so for a rechipped original ECU.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38825-mines-ecu/#findComment-787530
Share on other sites

Thanks RedLineGTR, I've been registered round here for a year or two but will be a more frequent user now I have my car here. I used the search function and found heaps about it. I agree with you and think the first step is the dyno which I have access to for nothing anyway, just haven't got round to it yet.

Most Mines ECU's I've seen (which isn't many) will have a big gold Mines Plaque. It should also have Mines seals on the sides. I've never thought much about aftermarket ECU's but now that I've found mine has the Mines chip I'm a lot more interested.

Sorry Flo but can't help you.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38825-mines-ecu/#findComment-787535
Share on other sites

Just bought a rb26 to go into my r32gtst and it came with a mines computer. Will this comp be ok for my car or will it s**t me with the lag associated with running less timing. Gav how did your car run and what power figures did you get out of if?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38825-mines-ecu/#findComment-787836
Share on other sites

Just bought a rb26 to go into my r32gtst and it came with a mines computer. Will this comp be ok for my car or will it s**t me with the lag associated with running less timing.  Gav how did your car run and what power figures did you get out of if?

my soarer had a mines computer in it when i bought it, and most importers have a million laying around removed from car yard cars or even removed from thier own cars. that said i recommend whoever has one get it run up on dyno, to check for any signs of det. these computers do run rich but that is their tune style (like most jap tuners) the timing is the killer, tuned usually to run on their premium fuels not our dodge 98ron the timing is fairly aggressive by our standards. i have seen many a colapsed ring land and associated damage cause by these and most other jap remaps.

if it were me and i had a r32gtst i would run pfc, too dear? then just sacrifice throttle resonse and use a p&p like mtech or wolf. i know of a few stock ecu'd r32's, james from d1garages stock ecu'd cefiro ran good reliable figures 240~ rwkw 12.6 1/4. these cars ran only HKS fcd and a martin donnon rev/speed limit increase and map clean up. the cefiro even had stock injectors and fuel reg (compressed a little of course).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38825-mines-ecu/#findComment-788259
Share on other sites

Just bought a rb26 to go into my r32gtst and it came with a mines computer. Will this comp be ok for my car or will it s**t me with the lag associated with running less timing.  Gav how did your car run and what power figures did you get out of if?

320 rwhp at 0.9 bar with pods and HKS front pipes/zaust (DynoDynamics, Shootout mode). Both Micko and GotBoost got something similar I recall with the same ECU (all of us use programable ECUs now, btw).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38825-mines-ecu/#findComment-788618
Share on other sites

For anyone interested (I will get more details later) it just came off the Dyno and recorded 300 kw at the rear wheels with the 4WD fuse pulled. If anything, despite what we thought, it's running a little lean rather than rich. :headspin:

I've had a fair share of experience with mine's ecu's and it seems they have 2 tuning techniques, very very rich, ass loads of timing, or very very lean, moderate amounts of timing. Personally i hate the things and would throw them as far as i could. In my old silvia i actually made more power going back to a standard ecu than with the mine's ecu.

I haven't come across anyone out here who can tune them because of the aforementioned gobs of epoxy covering the whole chip. I'd definately get any car with a mine's ecu onto a dyno to make sure it's safe, and promptly change to something that can be tuned out here.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38825-mines-ecu/#findComment-801469
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...