Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just got my car road tuned before the dyno with 740cc deatchwerks, in hind sight they might have been too big for my application (rb25 neo with 250kw highflow)

I went from a crappy magnaflow reg with 440cs to a stock rail, reg with the 740s and the car started stone cold first go, ironically it idled and low load was actually better with it untuned than it ever used to be, starts every time with no throttle.

Anyway got Pete at Nistune to do a road tune with them to make sure there weren't any major issues before the dyno, unfortunately due to their size we had to play with the k factor a fair bit to get enough resolution to get the AFRs above 10:1 in the top end, this in turn meant my idle and low load suffered a bit, though with lots of tweaking the latency and making sure the O2 was set up correctly got it as good as it was before, able to mantain stoich idle and get it up to 11.5:1 in the top end with enough resolution to still tweak it further.

The real test will be when we get it properly tuned on the dyno and see what sort of economy I get, it is fairly poor at the moment but the tune was just a "good enough" one before getting on the dyno.

Pete was very sceptical of them being able to work with the nistune and get the low load/idle/cold start working properly but when he saw how well they worked was quite surprised, even more so that they worked with no tweaking at all from my previous setup. Will report back when I get the full tune done and do some testing to see what fuel economy is like.

Edited by Rolls
  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Getting ~14-15L/100km city driving with a good enough tune, better than with GTR injectors as I was getting closer to 16 and the same driving style

gets properly tuned tonight, will see if it improves.

Edited by Rolls

I only have 555cc nismo injectors, but I get like 9L /100km according to my ecutalk consult display and nistuned z32 ecu.

I was always under the impression if you get a full tune (not just 4th gear power runs) then you should get reasonable economy regardless of injector size. Obviously the bigger the injector the harder it will be to have good economy on light loads though.

Have I been under the wrong impression?

Depends on the injectors minimum pulse width. My min pulse width is smaller with DW 600cc than the stock inj minimum, so it negates any idea that they won't cruise or idle on stoich. Don't know about the 1000/2000s.

Also, I don't know how your cars tuned Mitch, but I've found that the trip computer economy goes out the window if you change injectors because you also change the K constant. E.g, my car now thinks I can do 1000kms on a tank because My k constant almost halved within the factory ECU. Its obviously not going to do 1000km on a tank any time soon!

Depends on the injectors minimum pulse width. My min pulse width is smaller with DW 600cc than the stock inj minimum, so it negates any idea that they won't cruise or idle on stoich. Don't know about the 1000/2000s.

Also, I don't know how your cars tuned Mitch, but I've found that the trip computer economy goes out the window if you change injectors because you also change the K constant. E.g, my car now thinks I can do 1000kms on a tank because My k constant almost halved within the factory ECU. Its obviously not going to do 1000km on a tank any time soon!

I was just quoting what my ecu consult display says. I think it should be reasonably accurate though, because my nistuned z32 ecu still supports consult and the nistune daughterboard adjusts all the values to suit everything before being read at the consult port.

But it could be wrong as well. Pre tune on stock setup I was getting about 450km per tank running it down to just before the fuel light.

So far I have done 300km and still have a bit less than half a tank.

I was just quoting what my ecu consult display says. I think it should be reasonably accurate though, because my nistuned z32 ecu still supports consult and the nistune daughterboard adjusts all the values to suit everything before being read at the consult port.

But it could be wrong as well. Pre tune on stock setup I was getting about 450km per tank running it down to just before the fuel light.

So far I have done 300km and still have a bit less than half a tank.

Lol are you ever on boost?

I was just quoting what my ecu consult display says. I think it should be reasonably accurate though, because my nistuned z32 ecu still supports consult and the nistune daughterboard adjusts all the values to suit everything before being read at the consult port.

But it could be wrong as well. Pre tune on stock setup I was getting about 450km per tank running it down to just before the fuel light.

So far I have done 300km and still have a bit less than half a tank.

It doesn't adjust the fuel figures, ignore them and work it out properly, there is not way you get 9L/100km

do it the way everyone else does, run to empty, full tank, reset odo, run to empty, divide litres used / odo * 100

Edited by Rolls

Lol, you wish sunshine, unless youre on the highway the whole time or you don't boost, ever!

I'm not gonna argue with people about it, because it's so trivial. I'm open to the fact the ecutalk consult might not be right with econom calculations now, but I know how far I travel on each tank and how much fuel the car takes when I go to fill it up. Canberra doesn't have crazy traffic though, its pretty open, so that could be part of it.

Edited by Mitcho_7

You may get a reading of 9L per 100km at one particular point in time but that is not the same as an actual average consumption figure. Km per tank are not accurate you need to measure the fuel used for a given number of km and do the calculation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...