Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey i have done a search without alot of success.

I read in another thread sydneykid and Roy talking about installing standard RB26 cams into an RB20.

I just wanted to know more about it. who has done it. what changes to the head are necessary and what sort of gains seen from such a modification.

any info would be great.

Cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38857-rb26-camshafts-in-rb20/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 285
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1. who has done it

2. what changes to the head are necessary

3. what sort of gains seen from such a modification.

Hi Benny,

1. We have, 4 so far

2. None

3. Very much depends on what else you have done. But from what we have seen, you will get;

A. earlier boost build

B. faster throttle response

C. about 15 rwkw increase in the average power from 4,000 rpm to 7,000 rpm

D. about 10 rwkw increase in max power

If you are on a budget and can do it yourself it is very worthwhile. If you can't DIY then you may well be better off spending a few hundred extra on used aftermarket cams, as the fitting cost will be the same. As Autobarn suggested, there are a few HKS 264's around that are a step up from standard RB26 cams

Hope that helps

Thanks sydneykid.

hmmm well im always keen to try it myself. however i have never installed cams before. but it hasnt stoped me from doing everything else to my car :)

ill have to read up on it first. any advice?

is there a large price difference between step 1 HKS and GTR cams?

Thanks sydneykid.

hmmm well im always keen to try it myself. however i have never installed cams before. but it hasnt stoped me from doing everything else to my car :)

ill have to read up on it first. any advice?

is there a large price difference between step 1 HKS and GTR cams?

Hi Benny, since used pairs of standard GTR cams are pretty common, I wouldn't pay more than $300. Used HKS (or any other Japanese brand name) cams seem to go for around $800 for the pair.

I am also keen on doing this,

SK - have you noticed any differance between R32/33/34 GTR cams? each one seems to come out with differant torque from the factory, just wondering if this is cam related or something else?

Seems like a really good mod, I assume there are further gains to be had with adjsutable cam pulleys as well? Any setting you can recommend to try?

Chris

Hi Chris, I haven't seen any difference between R32 and R33 GTR cams. The R34 exhaust cam has slightly different lobe centres, but it is pretty minor, most likely for emmissions anyway. Adjustable camshaft pulleys are worthwhile, if they fit your budget. I usually start at 2 degrees advanced on the inlet and 4 degrees retarded on the exhaust.

Hope that helps

Cheers, now just need to find a set and I'll be right! I will get some cam gears as well to optimise the whole setup

Thanks for the info, those pulley settings seem to be what everyone ends up at with RB26's, would those settings still apply for RB20? I guess the best test will be to install them and have a play on the dyno to see whats best, but I guess they will be a good starting point

Chris

thanks for the info Sydney kid, i am just getting a pair of adjustable cam gears, but i think i will add a pair of GTR cams to the trolley and see what results i get.

for everyone interested i will post the results before and after so we can see the true difference.

Oh and any advice when installing them?

Anyone know what the difference in specs between the RB20 and the RB26 cams are. Im guessing the RB26 have a longer duration as the HKS would but maybe not as much???

Cam timing is pretty much the same (240) but the lift on the standard RB26 cams is much higher (8.6 mm vs 7.8 mm). So you don't loose a lot down low, but the extra lift is great all through the rpm range. Most brands of aftermarket 264's are around 9.2 mm lift and, depending on the condition of the hydraulic lifters, this can be a problem. Plus you loose a bit down low because of the longer duration.

The standard RB26 camshafts into RB20's is a real good, cheap upgrade.

Whats the go with hydraulic lifters if your current ones are a bit tired. I have been given a price to service a head, lifters and all, but what is involved?

Ive got the cams, valvesprings and cam gears to go in, but if you have a slightly noisy lifter on startup... im imagining its time to do something about the lifters at the same time as the GTR cams go in. ... What started out a s a cheap/budget upgrade to try and fill the lungs of the TD06 a little earlier is slowly turning into a pricey build.

hmmm thats what i was afraid of roy, something simple and cheap(ish) getting all nasty on me!

have you done the cam instalation yourself? how difficult is it. the only thing im worried about is setting everything in alignment - top dead centre or whatever. i dont want to make a mess of things when i get it all going.

To take the head off and instalibng the cams isnt a real drama, doing it with the head in place holds a few challenges which means i may not be able to do it myslef...

plus with my new accomodationin i no longer have a suitable place to work on my car. The compression test on my engine next week, and a few things falling into place the next 24hrs will play a big role in whether i bother with my current engine, or start with a blank canvas.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...