Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hmmmm. My mistake. I was going off NDSOC club criteria, which allows a few non-marque cars including GTR's, although GTSt's are all excluded......interesting that all 911's are included though.

Here is the MSCA current competition page for Vic.

http://www.cm510.com/msca/

NRB, while your putting new pads in, make sure you bleed the brake fluid, or even better, just replace it all with something like Motul DOT 5.1. Brake bleeding is not hard.

Hmmmm. My mistake. I was  going off NDSOC club criteria, which allows a few non-marque cars including GTR's, although GTSt's are all excluded......interesting that all 911's are included though.

I have seen that a couple of times Geoff, I think it must be the old "GTR's were sold here" rubbish. After all it was only R32 GTR's, but they seem to ignore that and accept R33 GTR's and R34 GTR's as well. Snobbery keeps the "poor man's" GTST out though. I just enter those sorts of events as;

Make = Nissan

Model = Skyline R32

Don't mention GTR or GTST, they just assume it's a GTR and you are in.

SydneyKid - Ben is now using Bridgestone RE55's and he swears by them. He claims they give him at least a second over anything else he's used before.

Is he still running those slick tyre spring rates, 700 lbs in the front and 500 lbs in the rear?

SydneyKid - Ben is now using Bridgestone RE55's and he swears by them. He claims they give him at least a second over anything else he's used before.

I definately agree with that....but on the down side they're dead in literally 20 laps. Velllllly soft tyres. We ran em at Dutton Rally last year, took a second off our dunlop formula r times but they were showing canvas after the 20 events

Yes, even the GTS was listed as a GTR on the timesheets. Made it hard to determine who was doing what lap time.

I was happy enough though to do faster times than one of the 968cs cars on semi comp rubber with Targa spec preparation. the owner was parke 2 bays away and was shocked at the acceleration I had on standard computer. Pity about the limiter though. PFC to the rescue in 2 pay days :D

Maserati club page for those interested http://www.maserati.org.au/Quick_access.htm

no times yet.

Is he still running those slick tyre spring rates, 700 lbs in the front and 500 lbs in the rear?

I honestly don't know sorry. But I'm guessing you also don't know about the new wing then either Sydneykid. He says this has made a big difference as well!

mas_04_04_104b.jpg

I guess in a 4WD you don't really need as much pitch.

Also if you are using the springs to increase the roll stiffness rather than sway bars you will end up with a very stiff setup. Just look at the GTP cars, I am not sure now but previously you weren't allowed to change the sway bars so they were all sprung to the shiznit

It's easy NRB, get the corner speed up and you won't need to use the brakes so much.  We use DBA slotted rotors with Hawke pads in the Blue compound, still able to lock the wheels at the end of a 12 lapper.  Tyres are the limit of our braking not the brakes themselves.

You gotta get out there and get the adrenalin happening, it's good for the soul.

The last track day I ran RB74 fronts and Comp2 rears. Unfortunately I also had crappy "compliance" fluid, DOT4 I think. Since then I've replaced my fluid with Motul DOT5.1 and I've got some Galfer front pads for track days. I found with the crud fluid I could only string together 2 lapsbefore fade set in. I wish R32 brakes were bigger (mine's non VSpec). I'm also running a lot more power since that day!

NRB, while your putting new pads in, make sure you bleed the brake fluid, or even better, just replace it all with something like Motul DOT 5.1. Brake bleeding is not hard.

Already done - see above. Thanks for advice though!

Sydney - the spring rates are in excess of 700lb fr / 500lb rear. How does this tie in with "the whiteline philosophy", ie dont use greater than 250lb rears even on a race car

Hi ben, as Gojira said, GTR's don't need to be as compliant in the rear as GTST's because of the 4wd. We have the same problem with production cars where we can't change the stabiliser bars or the anti dive or anti squat geometry, so we have to run mega spring rates. Plus we can't get enough positive caster under the regs and too much negative camber means it won't stop. For example we have an Integra with 1,700 lbs per inch rear springs. On the Improved Production Civic we run 700 lbs per inch rear springs, because we have changed the stabiliser bars and the suspension geometry plus it runs a lot of caster.

The mega spring rate philosophy is certainly not our preferred option. With similar tyres, the corner speed of the Improved Production car is much higher than the Production car but we have no choice under the regulations. Even the V8Dinosaur runs lower spring rates, despite weighing 30% more, than the Integra.

Hope that clarifies

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...